Green v. Daniels et al

Filing 130

ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 113 Motion for Transcripts re ECF No. 110 Minutes of Proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III on 2/7/2024. (Attachments: # 1 ECF No. 110 Minute Order)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

Brandon Green,

2:21-cv-00681-RFB-MDC

4

Plaintiff(s),
5

vs.

Order

6

Charles Daniels, et al.,
7

Defendant(s).
8

The Court has considered plaintiff Brandon Green’s motion for transcripts. ECF No. 113. The
9

Court grants the motion in part. Plaintiff states that he needs the transcripts from the December 14, 2023,
10

motion to withdraw hearing because he needs copies of the remaining deadlines. Since the deadlines are
11

stated in the Court’s order (ECF No. 110), the Court finds that it is unnecessary to order that the entire
12

hearing be transcribed at this time.
13

For the foregoing reasons,
14

IT IS ORDERED that:
15

1.

Plaintiff’s motion for transcripts (ECF No. 113) is GRANTED IN PART.

2.

The Clerk of Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the Court’s minute order (ECF

16
17

No. 110) with the remaining deadlines.
18

NOTICE
19

Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and
20

recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk
21

of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal
22

may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified
23

time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections
24

within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the
25

1

right to appeal the District Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court.

2

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452,

3

454 (9th Cir. 1983).

4

Pursuant to LR IA 3-1, the plaintiff must immediately file written notification with the court of

5

any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party’s attorney,

6

or upon the opposing party if the party is unrepresented by counsel. Failure to comply with this rule may

7

result in dismissal of the action.

8

It is so ordered.

9

DATED this 7th day of February 2024.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

_________________________
Maximiliano D. Couvillier III
United States Magistrate Judge