Centeno v. Lombardo et al

Filing 17

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for clarification, Docket No. 16 , is GRANTED, as explained in this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than July 5, 2024, Plaintiff must either pay the full $405 filing fee or file a completed Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis for Inmate, which is pages 13 of the Courts approved form, that is properly signed twice on page 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff fails to timely comply with t his order, this action will be subject to dismissal without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is INSTRUCTED to send Plaintiff Gerold Esparza Centeno the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis for an inmate and instructions for the same. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/4/2024. (For Distribution by law library.) (Attachments: # 1 IFP Form with Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - GA)

Download PDF
1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA GEROLD ESPARZA CENTENO, Case No.: 2:23-cv-01938-JAD-NJK Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOE LOMBARDO, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting clarification of the Court’s May 13, 2024, Order. Docket No. 16. The Court’s Order explained that, although Plaintiff filed a financial certificate and a trust fund account statement, Plaintiff’s request for in forma pauperis status was deficient because he “has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis.” Docket No. 15 at 1. As the Order further explained, for an inmate like Plaintiff to apply for in forma pauperis status, he must submit three documents to the Court, including “a completed Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis for Inmate, which is pages 1–3 of the Court’s approved form that is properly signed by the inmate twice on page 3.” The Court now clarifies that Plaintiff’s request for in forma pauperis status is deficient because he has not yet filed an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis for Inmate, including the acknowledgement on page 3. In light of Plaintiff’s pro se status, the Court grants Plaintiff one final extension until July 5, 2024, to complete and file this document. Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for clarification, Docket No. 16, is GRANTED, as explained in this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than July 5, 2024, Plaintiff must either pay the full $405 filing fee or file a completed Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis for Inmate, which is pages 1–3 of the Court’s approved form, that is properly signed twice on page 3. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff fails to timely comply with this order, this 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 action will be subject to dismissal without prejudice. A dismissal without prejudice allows Plaintiff to refile the case with the Court, under a new case number, when Plaintiff can file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the required filing fee. The Clerk of Court is INSTRUCTED to send Plaintiff Gerold Esparza Centeno the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis for an inmate and instructions for the same. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 4, 2024. NANCY J. KOPPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?