Benitez v. City of Reno et al

Filing 11

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Benitez will PROCEED on his Fourth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendant Reno Police Department Officer Frady #14626. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ISSUE a summons for the above-named defe ndant and deliver the same to the U.S. Marshal together with a copy of the complaint, (ECF No. 10 ), the screening orders, (ECF Nos. 8 , 9 ), and this order for service on Defendant. The Clerk shall SEND to Benitez a USM-285 form. Benitez is reminded that under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), service must be completed within 90 days of the date of this Order. Proof of service due by 8/8/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 5/10/2024. (For Distribution by law library.) (Attachments: # 1 USM 285)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 JAVIER BENITEZ, 5 6 7 Case No. 3:24-CV-00088-MMD-CLB Plaintiff, ORDER v. CITY OF RENO, et. al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 On February 22, 2024, Plaintiff Javier Benitez (“Benitez”) initiated this action by 11 filing an application to proceed in forma pauperis along with a pro se civil rights complaint, 12 (ECF Nos. 3, 3-1). On March 5, 2024, this Court screened the complaint pursuant to 28 13 U.S.C. § 1915A, recommending: (1) the excessive force during arrest claim proceed 14 against Defendant Frady; (2) the municipality liability claim against Defendants City of 15 Reno and Reno Police Department be dismissed with leave to amend; and (3) the false 16 imprisonment claim be dismissed without prejudice and without leave to amend. (ECF 17 No. 8.) On April 2, 2024, the District Court adopted the report and recommendation, 18 ordering that if Benitez failed to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the action 19 would proceed on the excessive force claim against Frady, and the claims against the 20 City of Reno and the Reno Police Department and the false imprisonment claim would be 21 dismissed with prejudice. (ECF No. 9.) Benitez did not file an amended complaint or 22 request an extension of time to do so. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Benitez will PROCEED on his Fourth 24 Amendment excessive force claim against Defendant Reno Police Department Officer 25 Frady #14626. 26 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ISSUE a summons for the above- 27 named defendant and deliver the same to the U.S. Marshal together with a copy of the 28 complaint, (ECF No. 10), the screening orders, (ECF Nos. 8, 9), and this order for service 1 on Defendant. The Clerk shall SEND to Benitez a USM-285 form. Benitez shall have until 2 June 10, 2024, to complete the USM-285 service form and return to the U.S. Marshal, 3 400 S. Virginia Street, 2nd Floor, Reno, Nevada 89501. Within 20 days after receiving 4 from the U.S. Marshal a copy of the USM-285 form showing whether service has been 5 accomplished, Benitez must file a notice with the Court identifying whether the defendant 6 was served or not. If Benitez wishes to have service again attempted on an unserved 7 defendant, then a motion must be filed with the Court identifying the unserved defendant 8 and specifying a more detailed name and/or address for said defendant, or whether some 9 other manner of service should be attempted. 10 Benitez is reminded that under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), service must be completed 11 within 90 days of the date of this Order. If Benitez requires additional time to meet any of 12 the deadlines set by the Court, he must file a motion for extension of time under Local 13 Rule 1A 6-1 and Local Rule 26-3 that is supported by a showing of good cause. A motion 14 filed after a deadline set by the Court or applicable rules will be denied absent a showing 15 of excusable neglect. If Benitez fails to follow this order, the above-named defendant will 16 be dismissed for failure to complete service of process pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that henceforth, Benitez shall serve upon Defendants 18 or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon the attorney(s) a copy of every 19 pleading, motion, or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. Benitez 20 shall include with the original paper to be filed with the Clerk of the Court a certificate 21 stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document was mailed to the 22 Defendants or counsel for defendants. The Court may disregard any paper received by 23 a District Judge or a Magistrate Judge which has not been filed with the Clerk of the 24 Court, and any paper received by a District Judge, Magistrate Judge, or Clerk of the 25 Court which does not include a certificate of service. 26 DATED: _________________ May 10, 2024 27 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?