CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST v. THE COCA-COLA COMPANY et al

Filing 12

DECLARATION of Warren W. Faulk re 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Admissions of Carmine R. Zarlenga and Oral D. Pottinger by NESTLE USA, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Carmine R. Zarlenga in support of motion pro hac vice# 2 Declaration Oral D. Pottinger in support of motion for pro hac vice# 3 Text of Proposed Order)(FAULK, WARREN)

Download PDF
CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST v. THE COCA-COLA COMPANY et al Doc. 12 Att. 3 BROWN & CONNERY, LLP By: Warren W. Faulk, Esq. (0305) 360 Haddon Avenue P.O. Box 539 Westmont, New Jersey 08108 (856) 854-8900 Attorneys for Defendant Nestlé USA, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, Plaintiff, v. THE COCA-COLA CO., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 1:07-cv-00539-RMB-JS ORDER ADMITTING CARMINE R. ZARLENGA AND ORAL D. POTTINGER PRO HAC VICE THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court by Brown & Connery, LLP, attorneys for Defendant Nestlé USA, Inc., for an Order admitting Carmine R. Zarlenga and Oral D. Pottinger of the law firm Howrey LLP pro hac vice, and the Court having considered all the papers, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED on this ____ day of ___________, 2007, that Carmine R. Zarlenga and Oral D. Pottinger be, and hereby are, admitted to the Bar of this Court pro hac vice as co-counsel for Defendant Nestlé USA, Inc. in this matter, and Dockets.Justia.com IT IS FURTHER ORDRED that Carmine R. Zarlenga and Oral D. Pottinger each shall make payment to the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection as provided by New Jersey Court Rule 1:28-2(a) for any year in which they continue to represent a client in this matter before this Court, and shall make payment to the Clerk of this Court of the fee of $150.00 as required by Local Civil Rule 101.1(c)(3). BY: Hon. Joel Schneider, Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?