WILSON v. MENU FOODS INCOME FUND et al

Filing 8

Attachment 1
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice MARK J. TAMBLYN and STUART C. TALLEY by LARRY WILSON. (Attachments: # 1 Statement As to Why No Brief is Necessary# 2 Certification of Joseph J. DePalma in Support of Motion# 3 Certification of Mark J. Tamblyn in Support of Motion# 4 Certification of Stuart C. Talley# 5 Text of Proposed Order # 6 Certificate of Service)(DEPALMA, JOSEPH)

Download PDF
WILSON v. MENU FOODS INCOME FUND et al Doc. 8 Att. 1 Case 1:07-cv-01456-NLH-AMD Document 8-2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 2 LITE DEPALMA GREENBERG & RIVAS, LLC Joseph J. DePalma Two Gateway Center, 12th Floor Newark, NJ 07102-5003 Telephone: 973-623-3000 Facsimile: 973-968-3845 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED LARRY WILSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. MENU FOODS INCOME FUND, MENU FOODS, INC., a New Jersey corporation, MENU FOODS HOLDINGS, INC., and MENU FOODS MIDWEST CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 07-1456(NLH) STATEMENT AS TO WHY NO BRIEF IS NECESSARY The undersigned, liaison counsel for plaintiff, respectfully submits pursuant to L. Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1) that no brief is necessary in connection with the motion for an order permitting Mark J. Tamblyn and Stuart C. Talley to appear pro hac vice in this matter, because such motion is addressed to the discretion of the district judge and does not raise an issue of law. 143677 v1 -1Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:07-cv-01456-NLH-AMD Document 8-2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 2 of 2 DATED: May 21, 2007 LITE DEPALMA GREENBERG & RIVAS, LLC By: /s/ Joseph J. DePalma Two Gateway Center, 12th Floor Newark, NJ 07102-5003 Telephone: 973-623-3000 Facsimile: 973-968-3845 Attorneys for Plaintiff 143677 v1 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?