IN RE: PET FOOD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Filing 370

MANDATE of USCA as to #302 Notice of Appeal (USCA) filed by Donald R. Earl. (Attachments: #1 Letter to D.C. Clerk, #2 Opinion)(ca3dm, )

Download PDF
IN RE: PET FOOD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Doc. 370 Att. 1 OFFICE OF THE CLERK MARCIA M. WALDRON UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 21400 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 601 MARKET STREET PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-1790 TELEPHONE CLERK 215-597-2995 Website: www.ca3.uscourts.gov October 27, 2009 William T Walsh United States District Court for the District of New Jersey Mitchell H. Cohen Courthouse Room 1050 4th & Cooper Streets One John F. Gerry Plaza Camden, NJ 08101-0000 RE: Pet Owner Class Plaintiffs v. Menu Foods Case Number: 09-1580 District Case Number: 07-cv-02867 Dear District Court Clerk, Enclosed herewith is the certified judgment together with copy of the opinion or certified copy of the order in the above-captioned case(s). The certified judgment or order is issued in lieu of a formal mandate and is to be treated in all respects as a mandate. Kindly acknowledge receipt for same on the enclosed copy of this letter. Counsel are advised of the issuance of the mandate by copy of this letter. The certified judgment or order is also enclosed showing costs taxed, if any. Very truly yours, Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk By: Dana Moore, Legal Assistant 267-299-4927 Dockets.Justia.com cc: Mr. Donald R. Earl James D. Arden, Esq. Thomas P. Bracaglia, Esq. Anthony G. Brazil, Esq. Gary A. Bryant, Esq. Mary E. Gately, Esq. Mark C. Goodman, Esq. Francis M. Hadden, Esq. D. Jeffrey Ireland, Esq. Gary L. Justice, Esq. Steven A. Karg IEsq. Gail E. Lees, Esq. Evan S. Nadel, Esq. Lindsay R. Pennington, Esq. Cristen S. Rose, Esq. Mark J. Tamblyn, Esq. William E. Wegner, Esq. Jeffrey L. Weinstein, Esq. Kenneth A. Wexler, Esq. Mark Whitburn, Esq. Brian D. Wright, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?