Spicer et al v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK Line) et al
Filing
9
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1) by The United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, MDL No. 2471. (Attachments: #(1) Record Request Letter) (tnS) (Filed on 10/31/2013)
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: VEHICLE CARRIER SERVICES
ANTITRUST LITIGA.TION
MDL No. 2471
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -1)
On October 18, 2013, the Panel transferred 4 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for
the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2013). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been
transferred to the District ofNew Jersey. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been
assigned to the Honorable Esther Salas.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned to Judge
Salas.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multi district
Litifjation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the
District ofNew Jersey for the reasons stated in the order of October 18, 2013, and, with the consent
of that court, assigned to the Honorable Esther Salas.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the District of New Jersey. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be
stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7'-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
, ,..} ~'
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?