STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation
Filing
159
MOTION STC.UNMS MOTION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE TRANSFERRING STEPS IN CLAIM 6 by STC. UNM. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Excerpts from B. Smith Testimony)(Pedersen, Steven)
Exhibit A
[Excerpts from] Bruce Smith Deposition Testimony
BRUCE SMITH - SEPTEMBER 14, 2011
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
3
---oOo---
4
5
6
7
8
STC.UNM,
)
Plaintiff,
)
) Case No.: 10-CV-01077-RV-DWS.
vs.
)
Volume 1
)
Pages 1 to 211
INTEL CORPORATION,
)
Defendant.
)
________________________)
9
10
11
12
13
DEPOSITION OF BRUCE SMITH
14
Wednesday, September 14, 2011
15
16
17
Reported by:
18
HEIDI BELTON, CSR, RPR, CRR, CCRR
19
Certified Shorthand Reporter No. 12885
20
_________________________________________________________
21
JAN BROWN & ASSOCIATES
22
WORLDWIDE DEPOSITION & VIDEOGRAPHY SERVICES
23
701 Battery Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111
24
(415) 981-3498 or (800) 522-7096
25
1
JAN BROWN & ASSOCIATES
(415) 981-3498
or
(800) 522-7096
BRUCE SMITH - SEPTEMBER 14, 2011
16:47:58
1
16:48:00
2
the impact of doing a damascene process with photoresist
16:48:08
3
still on the wafer.
16:48:14
4
like.
16:48:14
5
BY MR. STADHEIM:
16:48:14
6
16:48:17
7
16:48:19
8
16:48:22
9
16:48:25
10
Q.
Yeah.
16:48:25
11
A.
Again photoresist --
16:48:26
12
16:48:27
13
16:48:29
14
THE WITNESS:
16:48:30
15
MR. HUR:
16:48:32
16
THE WITNESS:
16:48:33
17
certainly be a part, but the polishing process wouldn't
16:48:38
18
have the photoresist in place.
16:48:39
19
BY MR. STADHEIM:
16:48:40
20
Q.
I'm sorry.
16:48:42
21
A.
The polishing process would --
16:48:44
22
Q.
No.
16:48:46
23
A.
A damascene process, part of that processing
16:48:49
24
sequence would include photoresist.
16:48:53
25
damascene process photoresist would be in place, but to
THE WITNESS:
Q.
I'm afraid I haven't looked into
We can step through that if you
What do you need to do; just think about it?
Or what do you need to do?
A.
Your question was could you perform a
damascene process with photoresist still on the wafer.
MR. HUR:
scope.
Object to the form.
Outside the
Incomplete hypothetical.
Photoresist --
Go ahead.
Sorry.
Photoresist on the wafer would
Would you repeat that?
I mean the whole thing, what you said.
So part of the
206
JAN BROWN & ASSOCIATES
(415) 981-3498
or
(800) 522-7096
BRUCE SMITH - SEPTEMBER 14, 2011
16:48:57
1
complete that damascene process you wouldn't do the
16:48:59
2
polishing with the photoresist in place.
16:49:03
3
16:49:18
4
precise.
16:50:01
5
I'm referring to lines 42 to 44.
16:50:08
6
"Transferring said first pattern and second pattern into
16:50:14
7
said substrate using a combined mask including parts of
16:50:19
8
said first mask layer and said second photoresist."
16:50:24
9
16:50:30
10
damascene process, could you do it while there was still
16:50:36
11
photoresist on the wafer?
16:50:39
12
16:50:41
13
16:50:59
14
16:51:05
15
etching.
16:51:09
16
process -- let me say it that way.
16:51:12
17
the damascene process could certainly be carried out
16:51:15
18
using the transfer step that you just read, which would
16:51:19
19
have the photoresist in place.
16:51:24
20
BY MR. STADHEIM:
16:51:24
21
16:51:28
22
16:51:32
23
MR. HUR:
16:51:36
24
Outside the scope.
16:51:39
25
Q.
So you couldn't complete the -- let me be more
Look at claim 6 of the patent, please.
And
And I'll read it.
If you were to do that procedure using a
MR. HUR:
Object to the form.
Incomplete hypothetical.
THE WITNESS:
Q.
Vague.
Outside the scope.
This damascene process involves
If the etching step of the damascene
The etching step of
Could you electroplate copper with resist
still on the wafer?
Objection; incomplete hypothetical.
Object to the form.
THE WITNESS:
There are certain parts of the
207
JAN BROWN & ASSOCIATES
(415) 981-3498
or
(800) 522-7096
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?