Basis International Ltd. v. Research in Motion Ltd. et al
Filing
1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Basis International Ltd.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Muehlenweg, Robert)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
BASIS INTERNATIONAL LTD.,
Plaintiff,
v.
RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, and
RESEARCH IN MOTION
CORPORATION,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. _____________
Jury Trial Demanded
Defendants.
COMPLAINT
COME NOW the Plaintiff, BASIS International Ltd. (herein "BASIS" or “Plaintiff”), and
for its Complaint against the Defendants, Research In Motion Limited ("RIM Canada") and
Research In Motion Corporation ("RIM USA"), states and alleges as follows:
THE PARTIES
1.
Plaintiff BASIS is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of New Mexico with its principal place of business at 5901 Jefferson Street NE,
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109-3432. BASIS has been in business over 25 years and is
recognized as a global software company that produces an innovative programming language,
database products, development tools, and an application framework for the software
development community to build upon.
2.
Upon information and belief, Defendant RIM Canada is a Canadian company
with headquarters at 295 Phillip Street, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3W8. RIM Canada designs,
manufactures and markets wireless solutions for the worldwide mobile communications market.
RIM is best known as the developer of the BlackBerry smartphone, PlayBook tablet computer,
software for businesses, and accessories.
3.
Upon information and belief, Defendant RIM USA is a Delaware corporation
with its principal place of business at 122 W. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 430, Irving, Texas
75039. Upon information and belief, RIM USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of RIM Canada
and serves as a representative of RIM Canada for purposes of conducting business in the United
States. (When not identified separately, RIM Canada and RIM USA are collectively referred to
herein as "RIM".)
VENUE AND JURISDICTION
4.
This is a civil action for trademark infringement arising under the trademark laws
of the United States, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1127; for false designation of origin and unfair
competition in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); and for trademark infringement and unfair
competition under the common law of the State of New Mexico. The Court has subject matter
jurisdiction of the federal trademark infringement and unfair competition claims pursuant to 15
U.S.C. § 1121(a) and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). The Court has subject matter jurisdiction
over the related common law claims pursuant to the Court's ancillary and supplemental
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1333(b) and 1367. The Court has jurisdiction over the
declaratory judgment count pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-02.
The Court also has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, as the amount in
controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interests and costs, and is between citizens of
different states and countries.
5.
Upon information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over the
Defendants because Defendant RIM Canada does business directly and indirectly through its
2
wholly owned subsidiary RIM USA within the state of New Mexico. RIM USA is registered to
do business in New Mexico and the acts complained of herein have taken place and will take
place within this judicial district. Further, upon information and belief, the effects of Defendants'
infringing activities and tortious conduct have been felt in the state of New Mexico and this
district such that it would be reasonable for this Court to exercise personal jurisdiction over the
Defendants.
6.
Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
7.
For almost three decades, BASIS has provided software application developers
with the platform (e.g. programming language, development toolkit, interpreter, database, and
application framework) to create new software applications. A key feature of BASIS’ software
development products is the ability to actively write software that is not tied to a particular
operating system, but can run on one’s operating system of choice. For example, a software
developer using BASIS’ products could write code for an application to be run on Apple's iOS
mobile devices such as the iPhone and iPad as well as numerous Google Android powered
smartphones and tablet computing devices, and BlackBerry's smartphones and tablet computing
devices. This platform independence feature of software written using BASIS’ development
tools is an important product differentiator for BASIS and provides the company with a
competitive advantage in the marketplace.
8.
Since at least as early as 1985, BASIS has continuously and exclusively used the
designation BBX as a source identifier for its software development products.
9.
BASIS owns U.S. Trademark Registrations 1,894,851 and 3,111,681 for the
marks BBX (Stylized) and BBX, respectively, for computer programs that provide tools and
3
programming languages to enable software developers to create and prepare business, internet,
and applications software. The trademark registrations have achieved incontestable status on the
Principal Register maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office and are in full
force and effect. BASIS also owns trademark registrations for its BBX mark in various foreign
countries.
10.
RIM is a designer, manufacturer and marketer of wireless devices and solutions
for the worldwide mobile communications market. RIM is best known as the developer of the
BlackBerry smart phone, PlayBook tablet computer, software for businesses, and accessories.
11.
RIM technology also enables third party developers to enhance their products and
services with wireless connectivity to data. RIM provides such third party developers with
application development tools to create applications that run on the Blackberry platform.
12.
On October 18, 2011, RIM announced BBX as the next generation of its
operating system for Blackberry devices. The announcement was made during the General
Session Keynote at the Blackberry Development Conference in San Francisco, California. Third
party software developers will be able to use RIM’s software development kit to create programs
that run on RIM’s BBX operating system.
13.
The parties’ respective BBX products are clearly related. By way of example
only, a software application created with BASIS' BBX to run on the Android or iOS mobile
devices will also run on RIM’s BBX for BlackBerry products.
14.
After RIM’s public announcement of its BBX operating system, BASIS began
receiving inquiries from confused customers. In addition to the inevitable confusion created by
RIM’s use of the mark BBX for related goods, customers and prospective customers are also
likely to wrongly believe that software applications created using BASIS’ development tools are
4
only compatible with RIM’s BBX operating system, thus impairing and destroying BASIS’
reputation for providing software development tools for cross-platform development.
15.
Indeed, the risk of confusion is not limited to the software development
community, but extends to end users who will become confused or mistaken that BASIS BBX
software and the RIM BBX platform originate from the same source or that there is some
affiliation, connection, or association between the respective companies.
16.
The lifeblood of BASIS’ business is its goodwill, relationships and reputation
with and among the software development community located inside and outside the U.S. and
end users of the BBX-developed software applications located around the world.
17.
Anything that negatively affects these relationships has the potential to irreparably
harm BASIS’ business.
18.
On October 19, 2011, the day following RIM’s public announcement of its BBX
platform, BASIS (through counsel) wrote to RIM, demanding that RIM cease all use of the BBX
mark. A copy of the letter is attached as Exhibit A. As of yet RIM has not responded and
through public discourse appears intent upon continuing its unauthorized and infringing use of
the BBX mark.
COUNT I
Trademark Infringement
(Registration No. 1,894,851 for BBX (Stylized))
20.
BASIS incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 – 18 above as
though fully set forth herein.
21.
Plaintiff BASIS is the owner of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 1,894,851 for
the mark BBX (Stylized) in connection with “computer software (written in a dialect of BASIC
programming language), and instruction manuals provided therewith, for use in the creation and
5
execution of business and financial application software” in International Class 9. This mark
was registered on May 23, 1995. A copy of this registration is attached as Exhibit B. This
registration is in full force and effect and has achieved incontestable status.
22.
Plaintiff sells its goods under the BBX mark throughout the United States, and by
virtue of its extensive sales, the BBX mark has become distinctive, and widely recognized by
members of the public who, upon seeing the name, identify the name with the Plaintiff.
23.
On information and belief, Defendants have launched a new software
platform/operating system using the mark BBX. Exemplars of Defendants’ advertising and
promotional materials are attached as Exhibit C.
24.
Defendants' conduct in launching a software platform/operating system bearing
the mark BBX with constructive and/or actual notice of Plaintiff's mark and registration
constitutes willful and intentional trademark infringement of Plaintiff's federally registered BBX
mark in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1114. Said use by Defendants, which is without permission of
Plaintiff, has caused confusion and is likely to continue to cause confusion, to cause mistake, or
to deceive as to the source, sponsorship, or approval of Defendants' goods in that consumers of
Plaintiff's goods are likely to believe (i) that Defendants' goods are either those offered by
Plaintiff or are in some way legitimately connected with Plaintiff, or (ii) that Plaintiff's goods are
either those offered by Defendants or are in some way legitimately connected with Defendants.
25.
Defendants' conduct complained of herein has caused substantial and irreparable
damage to Plaintiff and will continue to cause further irreparable damage to Plaintiff if
Defendants are not preliminarily and permanently enjoined by this Court from further violation
of Plaintiff's rights and Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.
6
COUNT II
Trademark Infringement
(Registration No. 3,111,681 for BBX)
26.
BASIS incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 – 24 above as
though fully set forth herein.
27.
Plaintiff BASIS is the owner of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,111,681 for
the mark BBX in connection with “computer programs and associated documentation providing
tools and programming language to enable software developers to create and prepare business,
internet and applications software” in International Class 9. This mark was registered on May
27, 2005. A copy of this registration is attached as Exhibit D. This registration is in full force
and effect and has achieved incontestable status.
28.
Plaintiff sells its goods under the BBX mark throughout the United States, and by
virtue of its extensive sales, the BBX mark has become distinctive, and widely recognized by
members of the public who, upon seeing the name, identify the name with the Plaintiff.
29.
On information and belief, Defendants have launched a new software
platform/operating system using the mark BBX. See Exhibit C.
30.
Defendants' conduct in launching a software platform/operating system bearing
the mark BBX constitutes willful and intentional trademark infringement of Plaintiff's federally
registered BBX mark in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1114. Said use by Defendants, which is without
permission of Plaintiff, has caused confusion and is likely to continue to cause confusion, to
cause mistake, or to deceive as to the source, sponsorship, or approval of Defendants' goods in
that consumers of Plaintiff's good are likely to believe (i) that Defendants' goods are either those
offered by Plaintiff or are in some way legitimately connected with Plaintiff, or (ii) that
7
Plaintiff's goods are either those offered by Defendants or are in some way legitimately
connected with Defendants.
31.
Defendants' conduct complained of herein has caused substantial and irreparable
damage to Plaintiff and will continue to cause further irreparable damage to Plaintiff if
Defendants are not preliminarily and permanently enjoined by this Court from further violation
of Plaintiff's rights and Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.
COUNT III
Federal Unfair Competition and False Designation Under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)
32.
BASIS incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 – 30 above as
though fully set forth herein.
33.
Defendants' use of BBX constitutes use in commerce of a device, or false
designation of origin, or a false or misleading description or representation with respect to
Defendants' goods, which is likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the
affiliation, connection, or association of Defendants with Plaintiff, and/or as to the origin,
sponsorship, or approval of Defendants' goods, and Plaintiff has been and is likely to be damaged
by Defendants' use of such symbols or device, or false designation or origin, or false or
misleading description or representation, all in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
34.
Defendants' conduct complained of herein has caused substantial and irreparable
damage to Plaintiff and will continue to cause further irreparable damage to Plaintiff if
Defendants are not preliminarily and permanently enjoined by this Court from further violations
of Plaintiff's rights and Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.
8
COUNT IV
Common Law Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition
35.
BASIS incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 – 33 above as
though fully set forth herein.
36.
Plaintiff has priority of use of the BBX mark for software-related products.
37.
Plaintiff and Defendants and their channel partners compete for and have many of
the same customers in the same channels of trade and compete for the same customer dollars
both in this District and elsewhere throughout the United States.
38.
Defendants' use of BBX constitutes use in commerce of a symbol or device or a
false designation of origin, or a false or misleading description or representation with respect to
Defendants' goods, which is likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the
affiliation, connection, or association of Defendants with Plaintiff, or as to the origin,
sponsorship, or approval of Defendants' goods and services, and Plaintiff has been and is likely
to be damaged by Defendants' use of such symbols or device, or false designation of origin, or
false or misleading description or representation all in violation of the common law of the state
of New Mexico.
39.
Defendants' conduct complained of herein has caused substantial and irreparable
damage to Plaintiff and will continue to cause further irreparable damage to Plaintiff if
Defendants are not preliminarily and permanently enjoined by this Court from further violation
of Plaintiff's rights and Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.
COUNT V
Declaratory Judgment
40.
BASIS incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 – 38 above as
though fully set forth herein.
9
41.
There is a justiciable case or controversy between the parties as to the threat of
trademark infringement and unfair competition as alleged above.
42.
As between the parties, Plaintiff has superior trademark rights in the name BBX
in connection with software-related products.
43.
Defendants' threatened acts, if not enjoined by the Court, would constitute
trademark infringement and unfair competition.
44.
This case is appropriate for a declaratory judgment under the Declaratory
Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-02.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff BASIS demands judgment in its favor and against Defendants
RIM Canada and RIM USA, jointly and severally, as follows:
A.
A judgment that finds Defendants have infringed Plaintiff's federally-registered
BBX mark and common law trademark rights;
B.
A declaration that as between Plaintiff and Defendants, Plaintiff has superior
trademark rights in the name BBX in the United States for use in connection with softwarerelated goods;
C.
A preliminary and permanent injunction that enjoins Defendants, their officers,
directors, agents, attorneys, servants, employees, successors, and assigns, and all other persons in
active concert or participation with them, and all those acting under the authority or in privity
with Defendants from erecting or maintaining or using in any other manner whatsoever the
designation BBX alone or in combination with other words and/or symbols as a trademark to
advertise, promote, or identify the source of their goods;
10
D.
A preliminary and permanent injunction ordering that Defendants remove all
advertisements, promotions, displays, packaging, price lists, catalogs, publications, and articles,
or any other materials in its possession or in control of any of its agents, which bear or represent
in any way a simulation, colorable imitation, reproduction, photograph, copy, or similar device
that is confusingly similar to Plaintiff's trademark and rights alleged above;
E.
that Defendants be ordered to account for and pay over to Plaintiff all earnings,
profits, receipts and advantages derived by Defendants through the marketing of goods in
association with the unlawful acts alleged herein;
F.
that Defendants be ordered to compensate Plaintiff for the advertising or other
expense necessary to dispel, cure, or counteract any public confusion caused by Defendants'
unlawful acts;
G.
that Defendants be ordered to pay Plaintiff compensatory damages in a sum equal
to three (3) times the amount of Plaintiff's actual damages pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117;
H.
that Plaintiff be awarded its costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees for bringing and
prosecuting this action; and
I.
that Plaintiff be awarded such other and further relief as this Court may deem just
and proper.
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff BASIS demands a jury trial on all issues triable by jury.
11
Respectfully submitted,
RAMMELKAMP, MUEHLENWEG & CORDOVA, PA
By: /s/ Robert J. Muehlenweg
Robert J. Muehlenweg
Elizabeth A. Heaphy
Sun Valley Commercial Center
316 Osuna Rd. NE, Unit 201
Albuquerque, NM 87107
(505) 247-8860
rjm@rmclawyers.com
eah@rmclawyers.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MCKEE, VOORHEES & SEASE
Jeffrey D. Harty
Christine Lebrón-Dykeman
801 Grand Avenue, Suite 3200
Des Moines, IA 50309
(515) 288-3667
jeff.harty@ipmvs.com
christine.lebron-dykeman@ipmvs.com
Appearance on Behalf of Plaintiff Pending
12
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?