Mikhlyn et al v. Bove et al

Filing 113

ORDER of REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Plaintiff's anticipated motion pursuant to Rule 37 is respectfully referred to Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. to issue a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 6/4/2010) C/mailed by Chambers. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Mikhlyn et al v. Bove et al

Doc. 113 Att. 3

LAW OFFICES OF
FREDERICK K. BREWINGTON
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW

50 CLINTON STREET, SUITE 501 HEMPSTEAD, N. Y. 11550 ___
TELEPHONE: [phone] FACSIMILE: [phone]
FREDERICK K. BREWINGTON -------IRA FOGELGAREN -------GREGORY CALLISTE, JR VALERIE M. CARTRIGHT

October 26, 2007

BY ECF Honorable Arthur D. Spatt United States District Court Judge United States District Court Eastern District of New York 100 Federal Plaza Central Islip, NY 11722 Re: Tardd, et al. v. Brookhaven National Laboratory, et al. Docket No: CV 04-3262 Dear Judge Spatt: Enclosed, please find: [1] Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss "Certain New Claims in Plaintiffs' Fourth Amended Complaint" Dated October 5, 2007; [2] The Declaration of Gregory Calliste In Support of Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss "Certain New Claims in Plaintiffs' Fourth Amended Complaint" Dated October 5, 2007 - with Exhibit A. The above documents were electronically filed with the Court today. Though Defendants' Motion was filed on October 5, 2007, the Parties stipulated to allow Plaintiffs' to submit a response to Defendants' motion, today, on October 26, 2007. Of course, Plaintiffs do not oppose any additional time the Defendants may request to respond to the enclosed. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Respectfully submitted, /S/ GREGORY CALLISTE, JR.
Encl: cc: Gc/ybw Christopher Parlo, Esq.(by ECF)

Dockets.Justia.com