Mikhlyn et al v. Bove et al

Filing 118

Letter dated 6/15/10 from Anna Bove and Polina Dolginov to Hon. Ramon E. Reyes, re: plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions and a Default Judgment, and requesting the Court's assistance regarding this matter. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Download PDF
Mikhlyn et al v. Bove et al Doc. 118 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------X Barbara Katz, Plaintiff, -againstMacy's East , LLC Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------X LINDSAY, Magistrate Judge: An initial conference will be held in this case on February 27, 2008 at 2;00 PM before the undersigned in Courtroom 810, United States Federal Courthouse, Central Islip, New York. All counsel must be present at the date and time indicated above except as provided below. Attached is a proposed pretrial scheduling order prepared by the court. The parties shall meet and confer regarding the proposed order. If the dates in the proposed order are acceptable and there are no other issues that the parties would like to address with the court, the parties may electronically file a letter application at least forty-eight hours prior to the date of the scheduled conference stating their agreement with the proposed order and requesting that the initial conference be canceled. Upon receipt the letter application, the initial conference will be canceled and the proposed scheduling order will be entered. The parties may also request by letter application that the case be referred to mediation. The parties are reminded of the obligation to provide automatic disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) unless this proceeding is exempted from such disclosure pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(E). INITIAL CONFERENCE ORDER CV 07-4282 (JFB) (ARL) Dated: Central Islip, New York January 7, 2008 SO ORDERED: ______________/s/_______________ ARLENE ROSARIO LINDSAY United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?