Greene v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al

Filing 2

Supplemental COMPLAINT , filed by Andrew Greene. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Goldsmith, Aaron)

JS

44

CIVL COVER SHEET

(Rev. 1/2013)

Siripi,ii"i'-jtiiting

ci"it aoctet sheet.'

tt'e

(EXC E P7' I N

fttm

Rtromeys

PAGE oF rHlS FqRM.)

PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Ct AI

ANDREW GREENE

County of Residence of First Listed

(c)

msrnucrrcws ctu Ntxr

DEFENDANTS

l. (a) PLAINTIFFS

(b)

13bt

Name.

U.

County of Residence of First Listed Defendant DELAWARE
ON U.S. PI"4IN|IFII CASES ONI,Y)
NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE T}IE LOCATION OF
THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.

Plaintiff SUtrgkeSgnly-$L-

S. P I-4INTIFI,' CAS ES)

Attomeys (IfKnown)

Ad,ltcss antl I elephone Nunber)

AARON M. GOLDSMITH, ESQ.
225Broadway, Suite 715
[phone]
NewYork, NY 10007

lI.

BASIS OF JURISDICTION

O1

3

[1

U.S. Govermrflt

For Ditersity Caies OnlY)

Fedral Questron

CitizenofThisstate

(LI.S. Government Not a PartY)

Plahtiff

A2

III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES

1rto,, o, "x" inone Roxontv)

4

ts

U.S. Govemment

Citizen or Subject

IV. NATURE OF SUIT
D

il
n
D

140

t]

I

il
D

I

D

32fi Assult. Libel

D

330

fedral

O

50 RecoYery of Ovsrparmetrt
& Enforcffimt of Jtdgmest

Medicne Act

340
345

Muile

3

15

Airylue

Product

O

D

of Vetem's Benofits
160 Stockholders' Suits
190 Other Contract
D 195 Contract Product Liability

11 350

il

Mrine

D

625 Dmg Related Seirue
ofProperty 21 USC 881
690 Othu

0

362 Personal Injury -

n

D

il

l"l

Act

220 Foreclosue
230 Rent Lease & Ejechnent
240 Torts to Led
245 Tort Product Liability
290 All O*rer Real Property

0

Dmagc
O 385 Property Dmage
Product Liability

720 Labor,Muagemmt
Relations
740 Railway Latror Act

D

371 Truth in Lending
380 Other Persoml
PrQper1y

l"j"ty

[1 440
O 441
0 442
O 443

il

5

A

n6

6

422 Appeal 28 USC 158
423 Withdrawal
28 USC 157

D

510 N{otioos to

tr

Accomodations

u,Digtilities

445 Ama.

I

446 Amu. w,Disbilities -

D

448 Education

O

C)ther

D€po.tation

R€apportiomqt

Antitrust
Banks

ad Bankhg

Colmelae

470 Racketer Influenced md

O

il

865 RsI (aos(g))

890
891
893
895

D SflSSIDTideX\1

Sffiif}- Act

0

O

0
il

870
871

Vaste

Exchage

D
Taa
or

IRS-Third

Parb,
26 USC 7609

Agdcultwal Acts
Enviromental Matttrs
Freedom oflnformation
Act
896 Arlitratiou
899 Administratrve Procedu'e

A*&eview or Appeal
Agency Decision

(U.S. Plaintiff

Deffldet)

Other Statutory Actions

D

950 Constitutionality
State Statutes

of

530 General
535 DeathPenalry
,15?

il 540 Mmdmus & Otha
il 550 Civil Rights
I I 155 PtlsonLonomon
O

,160

State

862 Black Lug {923)
863 DIWC,DIWW (a0s@))

791 Eflployee R€tiremffil
Itrcom€

0ther:

Employnent

0
[
0
B

False Clairu Act

n

t Fmily ad Medioal
Leave Act
790 Othfl Labor LLflgatlon

Setrtence

D

O

375
400
410
430
450

0 ,+S0 Cable./Sat TV
D 850 Swrities/Comrodities/

463 Alim Dstaine

D

Emplolment
Housing/

3

86i HtA ( 1395f)

75

Habeas Carpus:

Other Civil tughts
Yoting

D

480 Consmer Credit

710 Fair Labo, Stmdilds

il

360 Other Pqsonal

O

D

Place O 5 X
State

Compt Orgmizations

D 370otherFrard

Mots Vehicle

355 Motor Vehicle

hoduct Liability

2l0LmdCondsmation

4

D

PERSONAL PROPERTY

D

B

Liebility

Product

D

D [96 Frmchise

il
3

A

Nation

Personal Injury
Product Liability
368 Asbestos Personal
Iqjuy Product

Employers'

Liability

a
o

Foreign

3

Phmczutical

Slmdsr

of Or'flpalmsrt

D

365 Pusonal lnjury Product Liability
367 Health Cae/

&

Liability

52 Recovery ofDefadted
Student Loms
(Excludes Veterms)

153 Recovery

X

0

310 Airplane

Liability

Negotiable Instruoat

151

PERSONAL INJURY

PERSNAL INJTIRY

D
D

Meine
t30 Miller Act

120

Incorpolated ar./ Principal

2

n

DEF

ofBusiness ln This State

ofBuiross In Arodrer

D3

ofa

PTF
A 4

Place

Incorporated o/ Principal

an "X" in One Box

l0 lnsurac€

I

J

CitizmofAnotherstate A2

Diversity
(lndicale Citizehship ofPdfiies in llem III)

De{ondmi

PTF DEF
I I O i

"x" inone tsoxJdr l'taintrJf
and One Boxfor Defendant)

(Ptace an

Natuahzaton

465 Othtr lmrugrahon

Actioro

560 Civil Detainee -

Conditions of

Colfnment

v. ORIGIN
E1

Original
Proceeding

p'i,."

", "X" in One Box Only)
fI 2 Removed from
rt"

VI.
VII.

3 3

State Court

CAUSE OF ACTION
REQUESTED IN

tt* tls{*it

D

5 Transferred from

Reopened

il 6

Another District

Multrdlstflct
Litigation

St"tute under which you are filing (Da not eiteiwirdittimal sratut5 unless dive6it!)

Brief descriotion of cause:

Unlawful Use of Persona / Slander
cue,cr m rHIS Is A cLASs ACTIoN

D

COMPLAINT:
vrrr. RELATED CASE(S)
IB ANY

LTNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P.

AMOI]NT

DEMAND$
25,000,000.00

lsee tnstruclpru):

CHECK \aES only if demanded in complaint
.IT]RY

DEMAND: X YCS

DOCKETNUMBER

.TTIDGE
F,

RECEIPT #

n 4 Reinstatedor

Retnanded from
Appellate Court

OF ATTORNEY OF

APPLYING IFP

MAG, ruDGE

D

NO

of

CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY

Local Arbitration Rule g3.10

seeking money damages only in an amount not in excess of Sl50'000'
Theamountofdamagesispresumedtobebelowthethresholdamountunlessa

p.oria., rhur-ith ceftain .r..ptlo*. u"tions

exclusiveofinter.estandcosts,areeligiblefbrcompulsoryarbitration.
certification to the contrary is fi1ed.

I, AII9I IJ9LD:I4T

, counsel for

do hereby certif,/ that the above captioned

PLAINTIFF

civii action

is

ineligible for compulsory arbitration for the following reason(s):

tr

monetary damages sought are in excess of

tr
tr

of

the complaint seeks injunctive relief,
the matter is otherwise ineligible for the following reason

$I

50,000, exclusive

interest and costs,

Identity any parent corporation and any pubticly held corporation that owns

vlACoM, lNe ., 2711 Centerville

R-d.,

107o

or more or its stocks:

suite 400, wilmington, DE 19808

Rule 50 3 ' I (a)
please .list all cases that are arguably related pursuant to Division of Business Rule 50.3. I in section VIII on the front of this form '
irelated,, to another civil case for purposes ofthis guideline when, because ofthe similarity off'acts and iegal issues or
civil case is
provides that,A
saving ofjudicial resources is likely to result from assigning both cases to the
because the cases arise liom the same transactions ol. "r.r.tr, a substantial
* A civil case shall not be deerned '?elated" to another civil case merely because the civil
same judge and magistrate judge.,, Rule 50.3.1 (b) provides that
power
Rule 50.3.1 (c) further provides that "Presumptively. and subject to the
case: (A) involves identical legal issues, or (B) invorves the same parties."
both cases are still pending before the
otherwise pursuant to paragraph (d), civil cases shall not be deemed to be "related" unless

ofajudge to determine
coutI."

NY-E DIVISION OF BUSINESS RULE 50.1(d'I(2)
t.)

located in Nassau or Suffolk
Is the civil action being filed in the Easter-n District removed from a New York State Court
NO
County:

2.)

If you answered "no" above:

part thereof, occur in Nassau or Suffolk
a) Did the events or omissions giving rise to the claim or claims, or a substantial

gorrlrT

YES

part thereol-" occur in the Eastern
b) Did the events of omissions giving rise to the claim or claims. or a substantial
District?
more than one) reside in Nassau or

does the defendant (or a majoritv of the defendants, if there is
If your answer to question 2 (b) is
if there is more than one) reside in Nassau
Suffolk county, or, in an interpleader action, does the claimant (or a majority of the claimants,
or Suffolk County?
contacts).
(Note: A cotporation shall be considered a resident of the County in which it has the most signilicant

..No,',

BARADMISSION
good standing of the bar of this coutt
I am currentlv admitted in the Eastem District of New York and currently a member in

EYeslNo
federal court?
Are you curently the subject ofany disciplinary action (s) in this or any other state or
'
No
n Yes (If Yei, Please exPlain) []

I certifli the accuracy of all information
Signature: