Ogsbury v. OneBeacon Insurance Group

Filing 6

ORDER, that the 5 Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece filed June 25, 2009 is ACCEPTED in its entirety. That the above entitled action is DISMISSED due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's Order and pay the filing fee in full. Signed by Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 8/7/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Judge Treece's Report-Recommendation) (jel, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------TIMOTHY J. OGSBURY, Plaintiff, -v.Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-35 (Lead) 1:09-cv-36 (Member) (GLS/RFT) ONEBEACON INS. GROUP Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPEARANCES: FOR THE PLAINTIFF: TIMOTHY J. OGSBURY Plaintiff, Pro Se 70 Esopus Drive Clifton Park, New York 12065 GARY L. SHARPE, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE OF COUNSEL: ORDER The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation by Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece, duly filed June 25, 2009. Following ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece filed June 25, 2009 is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons state therein, and it is further ORDERED, that the above entitled actions are DISMISSED due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's Order and pay the filing fees in full, and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court is directed to close these cases, and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the court serve a copy of this order upon the parties in accordance with this court's local rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 7, 2009 Albany, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?