In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation
Filing
3809
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' Claim for Primary Restoration at the Ridgewood Trial Site. Document filed by Equilon Enterprises LLC, Motiva Enterprises, LLC, Shell Oil Company, Shell Oil Products Company LLC. Responses due by 11/1/2013 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Julian Davies, LSRP, #2 Exhibit Exhibits in Support of Declaration of Julian Davies, LSRP - Part 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibits in Support of Declaration of Julian Davies, LSRP - Part 2, #4 Affidavit Declaration of Richard E. Wallace, #5 Exhibit Exhibits in Support of Declaration of Richard E. Wallace - Part 1, #6 Exhibit Exhibits in Support of Declaration of Richard E. Wallace - Part 2, #7 Exhibit Exhibits in Support of Declaration of Richard E. Wallace - Part 3)Filed In Associated Cases: 1:00-cv-01898-SAS-DCF, 1:08-cv-00312-SAS(Wallace, Richard) Modified on 10/3/2013 (db).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
IN RE METHYL TERTIARY BUTYL ETHER
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
This document pertains to:
New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection, et al. v. Atlantic Richfield Co., et al.
No. 08 Civ. 312
Master File No. 1:00 – 1898
MDL 1358 (SAS)
M21-88
DECLARATION OF RICHARD E.
WALLACE, JR. IN SUPPORT OF
SHELL’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND
MOTION FOR PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RICHARD E. WALLACE, JR., under penalty of perjury, declares as follows:
I am an attorney with Sedgwick LLP, counsel for Defendants Shell Oil Company, Shell
Oil Products Company LLC, Shell Trading (US) Company, Equilon Enterprises LLC, and
Motiva Enterprises LLC (collectively “Shell”). I am admitted to practice in the State of
Maryland and the District of Columbia, and I have been admitted to practice pro hac vice in
this Court in this case. I make this declaration in support of Shell’s Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Claims for Primary Restoration at the Ridgewood Trial Site.
1.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 are true and accurate copies of excerpts of the
following documents that were produced in this case, relating to the history of contamination at
the Ridgewood Trial Site:
a. Walthery and Twinney Well Sampling Results, NJDEP-SITE220-026052 to
026053; NJDEP-SITE220-026055; and NJDEP-SITE220-026057;
b. Letter from William Mowell, Village of Ridgewood to John Horan, Esq., SHNJ-WG012572 to SH-NJ-WG012577 (June 23, 1992) (discussing 1987 MTBE
detections in the Village of Ridgewood’s Walthery and Twinney drinking water
wells); and
c. Village of Ridgewood Municipal Well Sampling Results, SH-WKRIDGEWOOD, 009195-009198.
2.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and accurate copy of excerpts of the 1994
Settlement Agreement, SH-NJ-XX-081405 to SH-NJ-XX-081417, produced in this case
relating to the history of prior litigation concerning the Ridgewood Trial Site.
3.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and accurate copy of excerpts of the 1999
Settlement Order, SH-NJ-XX-048711 to SH-NJ-XX-048717, produced in this case relating to
the history of prior litigation concerning the Ridgewood Trial Site.
4.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and accurate copy of excerpts of
Plaintiff’s Amended Responses to Defendants’ Requests for Admission Related to the Shell
Ridgewood Trial Site, served in this case on April 9, 2013.
5.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and accurate copy of the January 9, 2007
Administrative Consent Order in the Matter of the Shell Service Station, Ridgewood and Shell
Oil Company and Motiva Enterprises, LLC, SH-NJ-BB000058 to SH-NJ-BB000072.
6.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 are true and accurate copies of excerpts of portions
of the testimony from depositions taken in this case of the following witnesses:
a. Donna Plummer, taken on March 13 and 14, 2012; and
b. Irene Kropp, taken on June 6, 2013.
7.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 are true and accurate copies of excerpts of the
Revised Expert Report of Anthony Brown, Jan. 2013.
8.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 are true and accurate copies of excerpts of the
following reports served by Plaintiffs’ expert Anthony Brown in this case:
a. Revised Cost Summary, ID # 11346 Shell Service Station #138490, Jan. 2013;
and
b. Revised Site Summary, ID # 11346 Shell Service Station #138490, Jan. 2013;
9.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a true and accurate copy of excerpts of the
Revised Feasibility Study served by Plaintiffs’ expert Anthony Brown in this case, Jan. 2013.
2
DECLARATION OF RICHARD E WALLACE, JR. IN SUPPORT OF
SHELL’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
10.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 10 is a true and accurate copy of excerpts of the
Rebuttal Report of Anthony Brown, Attachments A and D, Mar. 2013.
11.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 11 are true and accurate copies of excerpts of the
deposition of Plaintiff’s expert Anthony Brown, taken in this case on May 28 and June 3, 2013.
12.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 12 is a true and accurate copy of an opinion in
NJDEP v. Union Carbide Corp., Docket No. MID-L-5632-07 (N.J. Super. Ct. Mar. 29, 2011).
13.
A complete copy of any of these items will be provided upon request.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
October 1, 2013.
/s/ Richard E. Wallace, Jr._____________
Richard E. Wallace, Jr. (admitted pro hac vice)
SEDGWICK LLP
2900 K Street, NW
Harbourside, Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20007
Tel: (202) 204-1000
Fax: (202) 204-1001
Rick.Wallace@Sedgwicklaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants
Shell Oil Company, Shell Oil Products Company LLC,
Shell Trading (US) Company, Equilon Enterprises LLC,
and Motiva Enterprises LLC
3
DECLARATION OF RICHARD E WALLACE, JR. IN SUPPORT OF
SHELL’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PROOF OF SERVICE VIA LEXIS/NEXIS FILE & SERVE AND E-MAIL
I, Kristin McCormick, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
United States of America that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing was served via
Lexis/Nexis File & Serve and ECF on all parties on this 1st day of October, 2013.
s/ Kristin McCormick
Kristin McCormick
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?