In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation

Filing 3957

DECLARATION of Kevin Wilson in Support re: (364 in 1:07-cv-10470-SAS, 34 in 1:14-cv-01014-SAS) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.. Document filed by Tauber Oil. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12)Filed In Associated Cases: 1:00-cv-01898-SAS-DCF, 1:07-cv-10470-SAS, 1:14-cv-01014-SAS(Walsh, Michael)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 12 Kevin Wilson Page 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE: METHYL TERTIARY BUTYL ETHER ("MTBE) LIABILITY LITIGATION PRODUCTS _________________________ COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL. PLAINTIFF, VS. SHELL OIL CO., ET AL., DEFENDANTS. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MASTER FILE NO. 1:00-1898 M21-88 MDL 1358(SAS) CASE NO. 07-CIV-10470 (SAS) DEPOSITION OF TAUBER OIL THROUGH KEVIN WILSON DECEMBER 16, 2013 VOLUME 1 Called as a witness by counsel for the Plaintiffs, taken before Dorothy A. Rull, CSR, CRR, a Certified Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on the 16th day of December, 2013, from 12:35 p.m. to 5:12 p.m., at the law offices of Strasburger & Price, LLP, 909 Fannin Street, Suite 2300, Houston, Texas 77010, pursuant to Notice and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Golkow Technologies, Inc. - 1.877.370.DEPS Kevin Wilson Page 91 Q. 1 2 This is a fax from Marilyn Dugan to Kevin Wilson dated October 25, 1995; correct? 3 A. Yes. 4 Q. And this is a fax regarding the 5 acceptance of vessel nomination for a product 6 identified as MTBE; correct? 7 A. Yes. 8 Q. 50,000 barrels, plus or minus 5 percent; 9 correct? 10 A. Yes. 11 Q. On the IVER SPLENDOR; correct? 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. With an estimated time of arrival in 14 Guayama of October 29; correct? 15 A. Yes. 16 Q. Moving down and to the left, there's 17 a -- heading, "documentation" is underlined? 18 A. Yes. 19 Q. Underneath that is the word "consignee." 20 A. Uh-huh. 21 Q. What do you understand consignee to mean 22 23 24 here? A. What I take from this is that Marilyn Dugan is asking Tauber to complete the documentation Golkow Technologies, Inc. - 1.877.370.DEPS Kevin Wilson Page 92 1 as they have directed here. So I would take that to 2 mean that Phillips Chemical sold this to Phillips 3 Puerto Rico Core because they've asked us to consign 4 the cargo to them. We, in turn, would have conveyed 5 6 this, the same information to -- under this 7 transaction -- to EcoFUELS. 8 9 10 Q. So could you walk me through the points of transfer of title from EcoFUELS transferring to Tauber -- 11 A. Uh-huh. 12 Q. -- all the way through Phillips Puerto 13 Rico Core, Inc., receiving title? 14 A. I can't really speak to that from what 15 we have here. 16 seeing, is that we received title from EcoFUELS at 17 point of loading in Venezuela. 18 to Phillips 66 in Bartlesville at Venezuela when the 19 vessel product loaded from the whatever delivering 20 facility was in Venezuela to the ship's rail is when 21 title passed. 22 Q. And on Tauber002144, the request -- 23 A. 2144, okay. 24 Q. -- the page that we were looking at. But I can say that, based on what I'm We passed that title Golkow Technologies, Inc. - 1.877.370.DEPS Kevin Wilson Page 93 1 A. Right. 2 Q. On this page, under "documentation" -- 3 A. Uh-huh. 4 Q. -- Tauber's role is providing documents 5 to Phillips Puerto Rico Core, Inc.? A. 6 It's -- it's providing documents to 7 Phillips Chemical Company. See, it's customary in 8 this business that whoever the ultimate consignee 9 is, so that documents don't have to be changed, 10 because -- under normal circumstances here, EcoFUELS 11 would consign the cargo to Tauber, Tauber could have 12 new bills of lading produced and consign the 13 product, consign it to Phillips 66 company, who we 14 contracted. 15 and have them consigned to Phillips Puerto Rico 16 Core, who is their customer. Phillips 66 could change the documents To eliminate these changes in bill 17 18 of lading documentation, it's customary for the end 19 user to provide those documentations records back up 20 the supply chain and it be done right the first 21 time. 22 Phillips. 23 proper documents -- 24 It's no bearing on our contract with Q. It's just a courtesy to provide them So -- Golkow Technologies, Inc. - 1.877.370.DEPS Kevin Wilson Page 94 A. 1 -- for the importation of a product into 2 Puerto Rico, which in this case is not -- which 3 is -- it's not clear here who was importing this. 4 Probably Phillips Puerto Rico Core, but that's a 5 guess. Q. 6 Do you have any independent facts to 7 indicate that this approximate volume of 50,000 8 barrels of MTBE was not delivered to Guayama, Puerto 9 Rico? MS. FARLEY: 10 11 A. Objection, form. No idea. (Exhibit No. 9 marked.) 12 13 BY MR. SHORT: 14 Q. 15 Okay. Exhibit No. 9. MR. SHORT: 16 17 The court reporter has handed you A copy for counsel. Another copy for counsel. 18 A. This is an old one. 19 BY MR. SHORT: 20 Q. And this document, for the record, is 21 Bates stamped Tauber001945, and is a sales 22 acknowledgement dated August 8th, 1985. 23 A. Okay. 24 Q. Were you working at Tauber in 1985? Golkow Technologies, Inc. - 1.877.370.DEPS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?