Vargas et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al

Filing 20

RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Document filed by Pfizer Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Keller, Bruce)

Download PDF
Vargas et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al Doc. 20 Bruce P. Keller (BK 9300) James J. Pastore (JP 3176) Debevoise & Plimpton LLP 919 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 909-6000 Attorneys for Pfizer, Inc. FILED ELECTRONICALLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------- X RAPLH VARGAS, and : BLAND-RICKY ROBERTS : : CASE NO.: 04 CV 9772 (WHP) Plaintiffs, : : -against: : PFIZER INC., PUBLICIS, INC., FLUID MUSIC, : ECF CASE : EAST WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and : BRIAN TRANSEAU a/k/a "BT" : : Defendants. : : : -------------------------------------------------------------------- X DEFENDANT PFIZER'S STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV. P. 7.1(a) Pursuant to Rule 7.1(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and to enable judges and magistrate judges of the Court to evaluate possible disqualification or recusal, the undersigned counsel for defendant Pfizer Inc. hereby certify that defendant has no 21978794v1 Dockets.Justia.com corporate parent and that no publicly he ld corporation owns 10% or more of defendant's stock. Dated: New York, New York June 30, 2005 DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON, LLP. By: Bruce P. Keller, Esq. (BK 9300) James J. Pastore (JP 3176) 919 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 909-6000 Attorneys for Defendant Pfizer, Inc. /S/ 2 21978794v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?