Associated Press v. United States Department of Defense

Filing 23

REPLY AFFIDAVIT of Sarah Normand in Support re: 12 FIRST MOTION for Summary Judgment.. Document filed by United States Department of Defense. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit exhibit a# 2 Exhibit exhibit b# 3 Exhibit exhibit c)(Normand, Sarah)

Download PDF
Associated Press v. United States Department of Defense Doc. 23 Case 1:05-cv-05468-JSR Document 23 Filed 03/13/2006 Page 1 of 2 MICHAEL J. GARCIA United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York By: SARAH S. NORMAND (SN-2834) Assistant United States Attorney 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 Telephone: (212) 637-2709 Facsimile: (212) 637-2702 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x ASSOCIATED PRESS, : : Plaintiff, : : - v.: : : UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT : OF DEFENSE, : : Defendant. : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x ECF CASE 05 Civ. 5468 (JSR) SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF SARAH S. NORMAND SARAH S. NORMAND, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, declares as follows: 1. I am an Assistant United States Attorney in the office of Michael J. Garcia, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, attorney for defendant the United States Department of Defense ("DOD"). I have been assigned to defend this matter, and am fully familiar with the facts pertaining to it. 2. I submit this declaration in further support of DOD's motion for summary judgment in this matter, and in opposition to plaintiff the Associated Press's ("AP's") crossmotion for summary judgment. 3. On July 7 and 8, 2005, DOD produced to AP the documents at issue in Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-05468-JSR Document 23 Filed 03/13/2006 Page 2 of 2 AP's January 18, 2005 request pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"). See Exhs. A-B. AP's counsel did not advise DOD at any time after the production that its January 18, 2005 request for "details and explanations of the decisions made to release or transfer detainees" sought documents beyond those generated in connection with the Administrative Review Board ("ARB") proceedings. AP sought clarification of other aspects of DOD's production, see Exh. C, but at no time sought clarification or additional production regarding that request. 4. In a telephone conversation on March 13, 2006, AP's counsel, David A. Schulz, Esq., confirmed that, other than detainee identifying information, AP does not contest DOD's withholding of information from the documents at issue in this case pursuant to FOIA Exemption 5, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5). 5. A true and correct copy of the July 7, 2005 letter from Assistant U.S. Attorney Elizabeth Wolstein to David A. Schulz, Esq., is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 6. A true and correct copy of the July 8, 2005 letter from Assistant U.S. Attorney Elizabeth Wolstein to David A. Schulz, Esq., is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 7. A true and correct copy of the September 16, 2005 letter from David A. Schulz, Esq., to Assistant U.S. Attorney Elizabeth Wolstein is attached hereto as Exhibit C. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: New York, New York March 13, 2006 s/ Sarah S. Normand SARAH S. NORMAND Assistant United States Attorney 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?