Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al

Filing 374

DECLARATION of Scott B. Wilkens in Support re: 367 Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion,,. Document filed by Country Music Television, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation, Viacom International, Inc., Black Entertainment Television, LLC, Comedy Partners. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14)(Kohlmann, Susan)

Download PDF
L. ~;,\,,· Registered OwnedIntellectual Property' Registered Trademarks: Mark Atom Entertainment Nos. Serial #: 78/734,700 Territory US Reg. #: None Addicting Games Serial#: 78/744,912 Reg. #: None US Addicting Games Serial#: 1085982 Reg. #: 1085982 Serial#: 1299466 Reg. #: 1299466 Australia Addicting Games Canada Addicting Games Addicting Games Serial#: 004742607 Reg. #: None Europe2 India Serial#: 1400575 Reg. #: None Addicting Games Serial #: 738812 Reg. #: None New Zealand Addictinggames.com Serial#: 78/744,903 Reg. #: None US Entertainment Snac~ng Serizll#: 78/734,823 Reg. #: None US Addicting Clips Serial#: 78/734,688 Reg. #: None US Addicting Clips Serial#: 1085983 Reg. #: 1085983 Australia RegisteredOwnedIntellectualProperty may be registeredunder previouscorporatenames, includingbut not limited to AtornShockwave Corp., Shockwave.com, Inc., and Atom Corporation. Furthermore, registered domain names and copy~ights have on occasion been registered under a dba/product name, including but not limited to Atom Films and Shockwave.com. 2 EuropeanCommunityTrademarkCountries:Austria,Benelux (Belgium,The Netherlands,and Luxembourg),Denmark,Finland, Prance, Germany,Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain, SCompanyden, United Kingdom, Cyprus, The Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia. U(HIBIT NO. VIA 15483433 Highly Confidentialk~RF~5o contentdistributed AtomFilms on priorto appearing the homepage AddictingClips. on of Whilea TOSviolation reporttypically qualifies typeof violation(e.g.copyright, the pornography, excessive violence, allclearances conducted relatively etc.), are in similar manner, payingparticular attention potential to third-party intellectual property infringement. Usersare notifiedof suchviolations land,if deemedto be infringing copyright against TOS, subsequent or our the removal theoffending of content), in and thecaseof suspected intellectual property infringement,provided Company' is with s Counter Notice of Copyright Infringement. Addicting Clips3'dPartyNotices: 5/23/06 Harassment complaint. Removal of offending accounts. 5/25/06 5/30/06 6/7/06 3'dpartyLinking complaint.No TOSviolation. Incomplete complaint/unverifiable follow-up - no complaint. Improperlyrouted message. No TOS violation. 6/13/06 6/13/06 Vulgarity complaint.Ultimately to trademark lead infringement discovery. Content removed. Defamationof charactercomplaint. Removal of offending accounts. 6/21/06 6/23/06 Language/context complaint the word"rape"in a cliptitle). (re: No TdS violation. Copyright violation complaint submitted a userwithmultiple by TOS violations. Accused user responded denying any wrong- doing;however failedto provideCompany he witha Counter Notice of Infringement. Content removed. 6/27/06 Excessiveviolence complaint. Content removed. 7/10/06 Complaint regarding disparaging remarksconcerning thoseof a specificnationalityand ethnic group. Complainantfailed to provideanyspecificinformation site address, name,etc.) (i.e. clip that would allow for follow-up. Request made for elaboration- no response. 7/10/06 Pornographycomplaint. Contentremoved. 2.13(c)- Exceptas set forth in Section2.13(c)of the CompanyDisclosureSchedule, to the Company'sKnowledge, Person is engagingin any activitythat infringes, no 111 Highly Confidential VIA 15483543

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?