Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al
Filing
374
DECLARATION of Scott B. Wilkens in Support re: 367 Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion,,. Document filed by Country Music Television, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation, Viacom International, Inc., Black Entertainment Television, LLC, Comedy Partners. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14)(Kohlmann, Susan)
L. ~;,\,,· Registered OwnedIntellectual Property'
Registered Trademarks:
Mark
Atom Entertainment
Nos.
Serial #: 78/734,700
Territory
US
Reg. #: None
Addicting Games
Serial#: 78/744,912
Reg. #: None
US
Addicting Games
Serial#: 1085982 Reg. #: 1085982 Serial#: 1299466
Reg. #: 1299466
Australia
Addicting Games
Canada
Addicting Games
Addicting Games
Serial#: 004742607
Reg. #: None
Europe2
India
Serial#: 1400575
Reg. #: None
Addicting Games
Serial #: 738812
Reg. #: None
New Zealand
Addictinggames.com
Serial#: 78/744,903
Reg. #: None
US
Entertainment Snac~ng
Serizll#: 78/734,823
Reg. #: None
US
Addicting Clips
Serial#: 78/734,688
Reg. #: None
US
Addicting Clips
Serial#: 1085983
Reg. #: 1085983
Australia
RegisteredOwnedIntellectualProperty may be registeredunder previouscorporatenames, includingbut
not limited to AtornShockwave Corp., Shockwave.com, Inc., and Atom Corporation. Furthermore, registered domain names and copy~ights have on occasion been registered under a dba/product name,
including but not limited to Atom Films and Shockwave.com.
2 EuropeanCommunityTrademarkCountries:Austria,Benelux (Belgium,The Netherlands,and Luxembourg),Denmark,Finland, Prance, Germany,Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain, SCompanyden,
United Kingdom, Cyprus, The Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland,
Slovakia, and Slovenia.
U(HIBIT
NO. VIA 15483433
Highly
Confidentialk~RF~5o
contentdistributed AtomFilms on priorto appearing the homepage AddictingClips. on of Whilea TOSviolation reporttypically qualifies typeof violation(e.g.copyright, the
pornography, excessive violence, allclearances conducted relatively etc.), are in similar
manner, payingparticular attention potential to third-party intellectual property infringement. Usersare notifiedof suchviolations land,if deemedto be infringing
copyright against TOS, subsequent or our the removal theoffending of content), in and thecaseof suspected intellectual property infringement,provided Company' is with s
Counter Notice of Copyright Infringement.
Addicting Clips3'dPartyNotices:
5/23/06 Harassment complaint. Removal of offending accounts.
5/25/06 5/30/06
6/7/06
3'dpartyLinking complaint.No TOSviolation. Incomplete complaint/unverifiable follow-up - no complaint.
Improperlyrouted message. No TOS violation.
6/13/06
6/13/06
Vulgarity complaint.Ultimately to trademark lead infringement
discovery. Content removed.
Defamationof charactercomplaint. Removal of offending
accounts.
6/21/06 6/23/06
Language/context complaint the word"rape"in a cliptitle). (re:
No TdS violation.
Copyright violation complaint submitted a userwithmultiple by
TOS violations. Accused user responded denying any wrong-
doing;however failedto provideCompany he witha Counter
Notice of Infringement. Content removed.
6/27/06
Excessiveviolence complaint. Content removed.
7/10/06
Complaint regarding disparaging remarksconcerning thoseof a
specificnationalityand ethnic group. Complainantfailed to
provideanyspecificinformation site address, name,etc.) (i.e. clip
that would allow for follow-up. Request made for elaboration- no
response.
7/10/06
Pornographycomplaint. Contentremoved.
2.13(c)- Exceptas set forth in Section2.13(c)of the CompanyDisclosureSchedule, to the Company'sKnowledge, Person is engagingin any activitythat infringes, no
111
Highly Confidential
VIA 15483543
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?