The Football Association Premier League Limited et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al

Filing 260

DECLARATION of Andrew H. Schapiro, Group 3, Exhibit 25 - 38 in Opposition re: 158 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment dismissing with prejudice Defendants' First Defense asserted in Defendants' Answer to the Second Amended Class Action Complaint... Document filed by Google, Inc., Youtube, Inc., Youtube, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 39 - 45, # 2 Exhibit 46 - 59, # 3 Exhibit 60 - 63, # 4 Exhibit 64, Part 1, # 5 Exhibit 64, Part 2, # 6 Exhibit 65 - 68, # 7 Exhibit 69 - 77)(Schapiro, Andrew)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC., ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. YOUTUBE, INC., ET AL., Defendants. THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION PREMIER LEAGUE LIMITED, ET AL., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. YOUTUBE, INC., ET AL., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ECF Case Civil No. 07-CV-2103 (LLS) ECF Case Civil No. 07-CV-3582 (LLS) SUPPLEMENT TO THE DECLARATION OF ANDREW H. SCHAPIRO IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE AND MOTION TO STRIKE MATERIAL FROM VIACOM'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUBMISSIONS AND PUTATIVE CLASS PLAINTIFFS' RULE 56.1 STATEMENT Schapiro Exhibit 26 Schapiro Exhibit 29 Schapiro Exhibit 30 Schapiro Exhibit 31 Schapiro Exhibit 32 Schapiro Exhibit 33 Schapiro Exhibit 35 Schapiro Exhibit 36 Schapiro Exhibit 37 Schapiro Exhibit 38

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?