The Football Association Premier League Limited et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al
Filing
260
DECLARATION of Andrew H. Schapiro, Group 3, Exhibit 25 - 38 in Opposition re: 158 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment dismissing with prejudice Defendants' First Defense asserted in Defendants' Answer to the Second Amended Class Action Complaint... Document filed by Google, Inc., Youtube, Inc., Youtube, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 39 - 45, # 2 Exhibit 46 - 59, # 3 Exhibit 60 - 63, # 4 Exhibit 64, Part 1, # 5 Exhibit 64, Part 2, # 6 Exhibit 65 - 68, # 7 Exhibit 69 - 77)(Schapiro, Andrew)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC., ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. YOUTUBE, INC., ET AL., Defendants. THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION PREMIER LEAGUE LIMITED, ET AL., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. YOUTUBE, INC., ET AL., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ECF Case Civil No. 07-CV-2103 (LLS)
ECF Case Civil No. 07-CV-3582 (LLS)
SUPPLEMENT TO THE DECLARATION OF ANDREW H. SCHAPIRO IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE AND MOTION TO STRIKE MATERIAL FROM VIACOM'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUBMISSIONS AND PUTATIVE CLASS PLAINTIFFS' RULE 56.1 STATEMENT
Schapiro Exhibit 26
Schapiro Exhibit 29
Schapiro Exhibit 30
Schapiro Exhibit 31
Schapiro Exhibit 32
Schapiro Exhibit 33
Schapiro Exhibit 35
Schapiro Exhibit 36
Schapiro Exhibit 37
Schapiro Exhibit 38
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?