Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 1048

DECLARATION of Professor Jonathan Harris in Support re: #775 FIRST MOTION to Certify Class.. Document filed by AXA Private Management, Harel Insurance Company Ltd., Harel Insurance Company, Ltd., Pacific West Health Medical Center Inc. Employees Retirement Trust(On behalf of Itself), Pacific West Health Medical Center Inc. Employees Retirement Trust(on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated), Pacific West Health Medical Center, Inc. Employee's Retirement Trust, Securities & Investment Company Bahrain, St. Stephen's School. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 through 3, #2 Exhibit 4 Part 1, #3 Exhibit 4 Part 2, #4 Exhibit 5, #5 Exhibit 6, #6 Exhibit 7 and 8, #7 Exhibit 9 through 11, #8 Exhibit 12 through 14, #9 Exhibit 15 through 21, #10 Exhibit 22 and 23, #11 Exhibit 24, #12 Exhibit 25 through 27, #13 Exhibit 28 through 32, #14 Exhibit 33, #15 Exhibit 34, #16 Exhibit 35, #17 Exhibit 36, #18 Exhibit 37 through 39, #19 Exhibit 40, #20 Exhibit 41 Part 1, #21 Exhibit 41 Part 2, #22 Exhibit 42 through 51, #23 Exhibit 52 through 65, #24 Exhibit 66 through 70, #25 Exhibit 71 through 74, #26 Exhibit 75 through 77, #27 Exhibit 78 through 81, #28 Exhibit 82, #29 Exhibit 83 Part 1, #30 Exhibit 83 Part 2, #31 Exhibit 84 and 85, #32 Exhibit 86 Part 1, #33 Exhibit 86 Part 2, #34 Exhibit 87 through 90, #35 Exhibit 91 Part 1, #36 Exhibit 91 Part 2, #37 Exhibit 92 through 103, #38 Exhibit 104 through 106, #39 Exhibit 107 and 108, #40 Exhibit 109 through 113)(Barrett, David)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 82 THE IRISH REPDRTS. :>ATRICK ,RUSSELL RAINFORD, GEORGE HERBERT BOSTON, AND WILLIAM EWING GRAHAM, PLAINTIFF,s,v. lrREDERIGK NORMAN NEWELL-ROBERTS, Dl!IFE1\TJ)Amr..July'3l.~£." Davit.tP;;, l~,..---.....,.. _~~ " ' ~r;~f)..J;/8: )1'ivateInternational La11r---Forei{piju;dgmen~Action in personam in England -Defendant a Eritish subject,--PrOceedirpgsirervedout$idethe jurisdiction oj theE,nglish ,Oo'!£rt-Judgmentente'r-eain .de.lq,.ult?f. appearanceAction brou,ght in. Irish jurisdict~on'iJn jogt oJ the English joogmerJ,t'-'Fact that ..defendant was a British subject did not amount to Submil$siOn to jurisdiption ,oj EngZish -Court.' ' .. ...' " . , THE IRISH REPORTS. 96 Davitt P. 1961. 97 THE IRISH REPORTS. Davitt P. 1961. RAi:liFC)Rri ANnO±IfERs 'Ii, •.. NEWELL" RO'BERirsi; 98 TB:E IRISH REPORTS. THETRISH, l.tE'I?OR'rS. '··9.9 THE IRISH REPORTS. nationality as a ground of jurisdiction could be just· " a subject is bound to obey the eomm .--------,~---,-- onthegroundthat of his sovereign, andtherefore the judgments of his sQvere courts;" and adds, " but this has been criticised as sma , t'.; of unreality in modern times," giving; as references, -It; NEWEL!,~()~'EIt.TS. Recogriitionan;dEnforcement of Foreign . Judgment the Comnf6nJ;JawCourts of the British . Commonwe atp. 155,aftd Chesnire,Prjvate International Law, atp\ Martin Wollff (Private International Law, Oxford UriiV' Press, 1945)" atp,. '262,saysthattheproposi~ion is. to-doubt., Cheshire, Private Interna,ti6nal Law (Hi'. 1947), is not ... ontentwith c merely expressing "doubt .page: 779 he'·sa;y~:--+-"'Sinceaforeign Judgment is:act'i,q only because .itimposesanol1ligationupon thedef (' 1 'it' f9110ws ··that<any .fact.w;hiclinegat,ives the existe that obligation is'abarto:-t;heacfrion. One of the me -:acts· must ',necessarily.bethat'.tHedefendantowe,s·· •. f to obey tfh.e,co,mmandof the tribunal whichhas-p; to create·theQbligation. 'I'heremustbe a correlatipnb \t~e .1egal'obiigationofthe defendant and the righ:t.< t:rihllnaJ:to~~~ue,/'its comman<iL Now, our law:Eha~ ,~;n0w·n.ltna~~t~ii);t;Y:;a,s the circumstances in wh. to >'. '. /~!giish,'@ontit'?1hfliYcaSSlln1e power to-decide a ....• » ipjerr,so'&(//m,.a;nd.1:t,:;is'· ., 'legitimatetoiirfer' •. ,·that the"c' . .h¥,which the,corilpetenc,e of, a:riEUglish COUl!~ ..is' ...... , must also he adopted whenthe'inquiry relates "t:o.t .. :.;'2:. \. petenc~of ·11:f'oreign0011rt.Persomiiljurisdiction .. .:-.~>.:(\.:.~,~> '. t d" ", th . ':Lt f C t t' <"'i.'" '.> , CQUny '. ~pelT.S'tl;P9n,e rlgn911 r 'd' .•... .0 our \{;;':3\;.,:··:· ,·.·t'Pe\defe~dant;' "";Apart::from:'speciak,powerscpJ,1fe !3t~tuteit is obvio~sthat,since<:the<tight!to' SllIl1piOrt <l~PQn>'.the. KptJWer ... t()··. llmmon;-,:jurisdic.tion'.is "i11 s ~~,~rcisable:only.·,·agains~ .. 'those,·llersons..•. ~hoar¢,rr>r '~ngland.·. ,TIthe, ··defendaitt;is,·a;hsent··, froIn/a .C@'llll, lt~~':~s c ... ; ....• t , • :{?~)~P!~~;o£:~~?there,:t~es,)~~e~ev THE IRiSH REPORTS. :B.EPO:R':l'S •. THE mISH: RFIPORTS. THE. IRISII . REPORTS. }:! , .. !,. "~ • ~- entitled

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?