Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 132

DECLARATION of Gustavo Bruckner, Esq. in Support re: #130 MOTION to Appoint The Knight Services Holdings Limited and the Americas/SwissCo. Trusts to serve as lead plaintiff(s). MOTION to Appoint Counsel MOTION OF THE KNIGHT SERVICES HOLDINGS LIMITED AND THE AMERICAS/SWISSCO. TRUSTS FOR APPOINTMENT AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS OVER THE FEDERAL SECURITIES CLAIMS AND CONCOMITANT SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL. MOTION to Appoint The Knight Services Holdings Limited and the Americas/SwissCo. Trusts to serve as lead plaintiff(s). MOTION to Appoint The Knight Services Holdings Limited and the Americas/SwissCo. Trusts to serve as lead plaintiff(s).. Document filed by The Knight Services Holdings Limited, Americas/SwissCo. Trusts. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Nespole, Gregory)

Download PDF
Exhibit 4 Firm Resume Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP Founded in 1888, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP is a full service law firm with practice groups in corporate/tax, pension/benefits, real estate, trusts and estates, healthcare, bankruptcy, limited partnerships, and civil and commercial litigation, with a particular specialty in complex class and shareholder litigation under both federal and state law. Wolf Haldenstein's total practice approach, supported by the Firm's mid range size, distinguishes the Firm from other firms. Our longstanding tradition of a close attorney/client relationship ensures that each one of our clients receives prompt, individual attention and does not become lost in an institutional bureaucracy. Our team approach is at the very heart of Wolf Haldensteins practice. All of our lawyers are readily available to all of our clients and to each other. The result of this approach is that we provide our clients with an efficient legal team having the broad perspective, expertise and experience required for any matter at hand. We are thus able to provide our clients with cost effective and thorough counsel focused on our clients overall goals. The Firm has its principal office with lawyers in the various practice areas, at 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016. The Firms general telephone number in New York is (212) 5454600. The fax number in New York is (212) 5454653. The Firm also has offices at Symphony Towers, 750 B Street, Suite 2770, San Diego, CA 92101, telephone: (619) 2394599, fax: (619) 2344599; 55 W. Monroe Street, Suite 1111, Chicago, IL 60603, telephone: (312) 9840000, fax: (312) 9840001; and 625 N. Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401. The Firms web site address is www.whafh.com. 2 W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP The Firm Wolf Haldensteins Class Action Litigation Group has been recognized by courts throughout the country as being highly experienced in complex litigation, particularly with respect to securities, consumer, ERISA, and antitrust class actions and shareholder rights litigation. The Class Action Litigation Group consists of 35 attorneys and 10 paraprofessional assistants. Brief resumes of these attorneys begin on page 13. Also included are the resumes of attorneys from other areas of the Firms practice who routinely lend their expertise to the Firm's class action litigators in the areas of tax, bankruptcy, corporate, trusts, labor, and ERISA law. The ability to call upon the internal expertise of practitioners in such varied areas of the law greatly enhances the strength and efficiency of the Firms representative litigation practice and, indeed, makes Wolf Haldenstein unique among national firms specializing in class action litigation. The nature of the Firms activities in representative litigation is extremely broad. In addition to a large case load of securities fraud and other investor class actions, Wolf Haldenstein has represented classes of corn farmers in connection with the devaluation of their crops; contact lens purchasers for contact lens manufacturers' violations of the antitrust laws; merchants compelled to accept certain types of debit cards; insurance policyholders for insurance companies' deceptive sales practices; victims of unlawful strip searches under the civil rights laws; and various cases involving violations of Internet users' online privacy rights. The Firms experience in class action securities litigation, in particular public shareholder rights under state law and securities fraud claims arising under the federal securities laws and regulations, including the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA"), is particularly extensive. The Firm was one of the lead or other primary counsel in securities class action cases that have recouped billions of dollars on behalf of investor classes, in stockholder rights class actions that have resulted in billions of dollars in increased merger consideration to shareholder classes, and in derivative litigation that has recovered billions of dollars for corporations. 3 W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP Among its colleagues in the plaintiffs' securities bar, as well as among its adversaries in the defense bar, Wolf Haldenstein is known for the high ability of its attorneys, the exceptionally high quality of its written and oral advocacy on behalf of class action clients, and its pioneering efforts in difficult or unusual areas of securities or investor protection laws, including: groundbreaking claims that have been successfully brought under the Investment Company Act of 1940 regarding fiduciary responsibilities of investment companies and their advisors toward their shareholders; claims under ERISA involving fiduciary duties of ERISA trustees who are also insiders in possession of adverse information regarding their funds primary stockholdings; the fiduciary duties of the directors of Delaware corporations in connection with change of control transactions; the early application of the fraudonthemarket theory to claims against public accounting firms in connection with their audits of publicly traded corporations; and the application of federal securities class certification standards to state law claims often thought to be beyond the reach of class action treatment. Wolf Haldenstein's performance in representative litigation has repeatedly received favorable judicial recognition. The following representative judicial comments over two decades indicate the high regard in which the Firm is held: Parker Friedland v. Iridium World Communications, Ltd., 991002 (D.D.C.) ­ where the Firm was colead counsel, Judge Laughrey said (on October 16, 2008), "[a] 11 of the attorneys in this case have done an outstanding job, and I really appreciate the quality of work that we had in our chambers as a result of this case." In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory Antitrust Litigation, MDL02 1486 (N.D. Cal.) where the Firm was colead counsel, Judge Hamilton said (on August 15, 2007), "I think I can conclude on the basis with my five years with you all, watching this litigation progress and seeing it wind to a conclusion, that the results are exceptional. The percentages, as you have outlined them, do put this [case] in one of the upper categories of results of this kind of [antitrust] class action. I am aware of the complexity . . . I thought that you all did an exceptionally good job of bringing to me only those matters that really required the Court's attention. You did an exceptionally good job at organizing and managing the case, W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 4 assisting me in management of the case. There was excellent coordination between all the various different plaintiffs' counsel with your group and the other groups that are part of this litigation. . . . So my conclusion is the case was well litigated by both sides, well managed as well by both sides." In re Comdisco Sec. Litig., No. 01 C 2110 (July 14, 2005) Judge Milton Shadur observed: "It has to be said . . . that the efforts that have been extended [by Wolf Haldenstein] on behalf of the plaintiff class in the face of these obstacles have been exemplary. And in my view [Wolf Haldenstein] reflected the kind of professionalism that the critics of class actions . . . are never willing to recognize. . . . I really cannot speak too highly of the services rendered by class counsel in an extraordinary difficult situation." In re MicroStrategy Securities Litigation, 150 F. Supp. 2d 896, 903 (E.D. Va. 2001) where the Firm was a colead counsel, Judge Ellis commented: "Clearly, the conduct of all counsel in this case and the result they have achieved for all of the parties confirms that they deserve the national recognition they enjoy." In Re Toys R Us Antitrust Litigation, 98 MDL 1211 (NG) 191 F.R.D. 347, 351, 356 (E.D.N.Y. 2000) where the Firm served as colead and liaison counsel, Judge Gershon wrote: "Class counsel are highly skilled and experienced and can fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class . . . . Counsel for both the class plaintiffs and the States have wellearned the compensation that they request." In Yud v. Saf T Lok, No. 988507CivHurley (S.D. Fla. Dec. 15, 1999) where the Firm was sole lead counsel, the court stated: "The attorneys have done an outstanding amount of work and fine legal work in a short period of time to bring this class action to resolution in a successful fashion." In Kurzweil v. Philip Morris Companies, 94 Civ. 2373, 94 Civ. 2546 (MBM) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 1998) where the Firm was sole lead counsel, then Chief Judge Mukasey, in approving a $116.5 million settlement stated: "In this case, this represents a lot of good, hard, serious work by a lot of talented lawyers and I appreciate it on both sides." W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 5 In Paramount Communications v. QVC Network Inc.; In re Paramount Communications Inc. Shareholders Litigation, 637 A.2d 34, 37 n.2 (Sup. Ct. Del. 1994) where the Firm was colead counsel for the Paramount shareholders, the Supreme Court of Delaware noted "its appreciation of . . . the professionalism of counsel in this matter in handling this expedited litigation with the expertise and skill which characterize Delaware proceedings of this nature." The Court further "commended the parties for their professionalism in conducting expedited discovery, assembling and organizing the record, and preparing and presenting very helpful briefs, a joint appendix, and oral argument." In re Laser Arms Corp. Securities Litigation, 794 F. Supp. 475, 496 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) where the Firm was lead counsel, the Court stated "plaintiffs counsel have demonstrated their experience in securities litigation and the Court is confident that counsel will proceed vigorously on behalf of all class and subclass members." In re Public Service Co. of Indiana Derivative Litigation, 125 F.R.D. 484, 486 (S.D. Ind. 1988) concerning the construction of the Marble Hill Nuclear Power Plant, where the Firm was lead counsel, the court said: "Throughout the life of this litigation, it has been both vigorously prosecuted and aggressively defended by thoroughly competent counsel on all sides." In re Public Service Co. of New Hampshire Derivative Litigation, 84220D (D.N.H. 1986) involving the construction of the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant, where the Firm was lead counsel, the court said of plaintiffs' counsel that "the skill required and employed was of the highest caliber." In re Warner Communications Securities Litigation, 618 F. Supp. 735, 749 (S.D.N.Y. 1985) where the Firm served as colead counsel, the court noted the defendants' concession that "'plaintiffs' counsel constitute the cream of the plaintiffs' bar.' The Court cannot find fault with that characterization." In Steiner v. Equimark Corp., No. 811988 (W.D. Pa. 1983) a case involving complex issues concerning banking practices in which the Firm was lead counsel, then District Judge Mannsman described, in part, the work the Firm performed: W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 6 We look at the complexity of the issue, the novelty of it, the quality of work that, as the trial judge, I am able to perceive, and then, finally, the amount of recovery obtained: I think I have certainly said a lot in that regard. I think its been an extraordinary case. I think it's an extraordinary settlement. Certainly defense counsel and plaintiffs' counsel as well are all experienced counsel with a tremendous amount of experience in these particular kinds of cases. And under those circumstances . . . I think it was, really, the strategy and ingenuity of counsel in dividing up the workload and strategizing the cases as to who was to do what and what ultimately should be done to bring about the settlement that was achieved. Current Cases Wolf Haldenstein is a leader in the class action litigation field and is currently the courtappointed lead counsel, colead counsel, or executive committee member in some of the largest and most significant class action lawsuits currently pending across the United States, including: In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 21 MC 92 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.). J.P. Morgan Chase Securities Litigation, (Blau v. Harrison), Civ. No. 04 C 6592 (N.D. Ill.). In re Collins & Aikman Corp. Sec. Litigation, 06cv13555AJTVMM (E.D. Mich.). Inland Western Securities Litigation, Case No. 07 C 6174 (N.D. Ill.) Lewis v. CNL Restaurant Properties, 6:07cv01245ORL28GJK (M.D. Fla.). In re Adelphia Communications Corp. Securities and Derivative Litigation ("Adelphia Business Actions"), 03ML 1529, 03 CV 5755 (LMM) (S.D.N.Y.). In re Bear Stearns Litigation, Index No. 000780/08 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.). W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 7 In re Loral Space & Communications Shareholders' Securities Litigation, 03 Civ. 8262 (JES) (S.D.N.Y). In re Triad Hospitals, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, Case No. 2960043507 (Tex. 296th Dist. Ct.). In re TXU Shareholder Litigation, Consolidated Case No. 0701707 (Tex. 44th Dist. Ct.). In re EGL, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, Cause No. 200700139 (Tex. 125th Dist. Ct.). Clear Channel Shareholder Litigation, Cause No. 2006CI17492 (Tex. 408th Dist. Ct.) In re American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, Consolidated C.A. No. 1823N (Del. Ch. Ct.). In re Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 07815 (D.N.M.). In re Lehman Brothers ERISA Litigation, 08CV5598 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y.). In re ScheringPlough Corporation ENHANCE ERISA Litigation, No. 08 Civ. 1432 (D.N.J.). In re UBS AG ERISA Litigation, 1:08cv6696 (S.D.N.Y.). In re Morgan Stanley ERISA Litigation, 07 Civ. 11285 (S.D.N.Y.). NYMEX Shareholder Litigation, C.A. No. 3621VCN (Del. Ch. Ct.). MBNA Corp. ERISA Litigation, C.A. No. 05429 GMN (D. Del.). In re Aon ERISA Litigation, No. 04 C 6875 (N.D. Ill.). In re Harley Davidson, Inc. ERISA Litigation, Case No. 05C00547CNC (E.D. Wisc). In re Guidant Corp. ERISA Litigation, 1:05cv1009LJMTAB (S.D. Ind.) Harris v. Amgen, Inc., et al., Case No. CV 075442 PSG (C.D. Cal.) (ERISA Action). W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 8 Comcast Corp. ERISA Litigation, C.A. No. 08773 (E.D. Pa.). Schoenbaum v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, et al., Case No. 4:05cv01108 ERW (E.D. Mo.) (consolidated antitrust cases concerning genetically modified corn and soybean seeds). In re Genetically Modified Rice Litigation, MDL 1811 (E.D. Mo.). In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust Litigation, Master File No. 03 C 4576 (N.D. Ill.). In re McDonough, et al. v. Toys "R" Us, Inc., et al., No 2:06 CV 00242 AB (E.D. Pa.). In re Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Corp. (ENH) Antitrust Litigation, No. 074446JHL (N.D. Ill.). Polk v. ScheringPlough Corp. et al., 2:08cv285 (D.N.J.) (Deceptive trade practices. In re Jamstar Marketing Litigation, MDL No. 1751 (S.D. Cal.). In re Apple & AT&TM Antitrust Litigation, Master File No. C075152 (N.D. Cal.). Beginning on page 27 is a representative listing of cases in which the Firm has been lead or one of the plaintiffs' primary counsel and the results achieved in those cases. In addition, a representative list of published decisions in cases in which Wolf Haldenstein has played a lead or other significant role begins on page 30. Derivative Cases Wolf Haldenstein is a leader in the derivative litigation field and is currently leading counsel in some of the most significant derivative actions pending in the United States, including: In re Mutual Fund Investment Litigation, MDL No. 1586 (D. Md.). AIG, Inc. Consolidated Derivative Litigation, C.A. No. 769-N (Del. Chanc.). In re Citigroup, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, C.A. No. 3338-cc (Del. Ch. Ct.). W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 9 General Motors Derivative Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1749 (E.D. Mich.). In re Ambac Financial Group, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, C.A. No. 3521-VCL (Del. Ch. Ct.). In re Medtronic, Inc. Derivative Action, No. 08-cv-00092 (D. Minn.). In re Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. Derivative Litigation, No. 60604310JF (N.D. Cal.). In re MBIA Derivative Action, 08 Civ 1515 (KTK) (S.D.N.Y.). In re R&G Financial Corp. Derivative Litigation, 1:05-CV-5547 (S.D.N.Y.). In re Atmel Corp. Derivative Litigation, Master File No. 06-4592 JF (HRL) (N.D. Cal.). In re Novellus Systems, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Master File No. C 0603514 RMW (N.D. Cal.). In re Verisign, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Master File No. C-06-4165-PJH (N.D. Cal.). Teitelbaum v. Cohen, No. 2833-VCS (Del. Ch.) (L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. Derivative action). OVERTIME AND COMPENSATION CLASS ACTIONS Wolf Haldenstein is a leader in the field of class action litigation on behalf of employees who have not been paid overtime or other compensation they are entitled to receive, or have had improper deductions taken from their compensation. These claims for violations of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and state labor laws, allege improper failure to pay overtime and other wages, and improper deductions from compensation for various company expenses. Wolf Haldenstein is currently lead or colead counsel, or other similar lead role, in some of the most significant overtime class actions pending in the United States, including those listed below: 10 Lavoice v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 06-0756 (S.D.N.Y.) Basile v. A.G. Edwards, Inc., o6-cv-0833 (N.D.N.Y) Rosenthal v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., 06-3995 (D.N.J.) Palumbo v. Merrill Lynch, 06-2104 (E.D.N.Y.) W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP Garrison v. Merrill Lynch, 06-3553 (D.N.J.) Roles v. Morgan Stanley, 05-7889 (E.D.N.Y.) Lenihan v. Morgan Stanley, 06-00794 (D. Conn.) Klein v. Ryan Beck, 06-03460 (S.D.N.Y.) Badain v. Wachovia, 06-06321 (W.D.N.Y.) Garcia v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc., Case No. GIC 841120 (S.D. Supr.) Weinstein v. MetLife, Inc., 06-cv-04444-SI (N.D. Cal.) BIOTECHNOLOGY AND AGRICULTURAL LITIGATION Wolf Haldenstein is a leader in biotechnology and agricultural litigation. The firm has represented U.S. row crop farmers and others harmed by crop supply contamination, price fixing of geneticallymodified crop seeds, and false claims and representations relating to purportedly "organic" products. The firm has prosecuted actions in these fields against domestic and international biotechnology and crop science companies under the federal and state antitrust laws, consumer protection and deceptive trade practice statues, and the common law. As a leader in this field, Wolf Haldenstein pioneered approaches now commonly used in these types of cases, including the use of futuresbased efficient market analyses to fashion damages models relating to the underlying commodity crops. The firm has served or is currently serving as lead or colead counsel in some of the most significant biotechnology and agricultural class actions pending in the United States, including: In re StarLink Corn Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1403 (N.D. Illinois) ­ class action that recovered $110 million for U.S. corn farmers who sustained market losses arising from defendants' contamination of the U.S. food corn supply with an improperly bioengineered corn seed product. Schoenbaum v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, et al., Case No. 4:05cv01108 ERW (E.D. Mo.) ­ Consolidated antitrust cases concerning genetically modified corn and soybean seeds. 11 W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP In Re Genetically Modified Rice Litigation, MDL 1811 (E.D. Mo.) ­ Consolidated class actions representing the interests of United States longgrain rice producers seeking to recover damages they sustained resulting from the contamination of the U.S. rice supply with unapproved, geneticallymodified rice seed traits developed and tested by Bayer CropScience LP and related entities. The website the firm maintains on the case is www.bayerricelitigation.com. For more information about our efforts in these fields, please contact Wolf Haldenstein partner Adam Levitt at (312) 9840000. PRIVATE ACTIONS FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS In addition to its vast class action practice, the Firm also regularly represents institutional clients such as public funds, investment funds, limited partnerships, and qualified institutional buyers. The Firm has represented institutional clients in nonclass federal and state actions concerning a variety of matters, including private placements, disputes with investment advisors, and disputes with corporate management. Examples of such cases include: Steed Finance LDC v. Laser Advisers, Inc., 99 Civ. 4222 (PKC)(S.D.N.Y.), a fraud, negligence, breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty action brought by a hub fund, a related feeder fund and individual investors in the feeder fund against the funds' former investment advisors for mispricing certain securities and derivative instruments in the funds' fixedincome securities portfolio. Diversified Asset Securitization Holdings I, L.P. v. Enterprise Mortgage Acceptance Co, LLC, et al., 02 Civ. 10228 (SWK) (S.D.N.Y.), a federal and state securities fraud action brought by limited partnerships that pooled the investments of various insurance companies against the issuer and management and controlling shareholder of the issuer, concerning misrepresentations made in connection with a private placement of certificates representing interests in a securitized pool of loans made to franchise operations of car care businesses, gas stations, convenience stores and quick service restaurants. Gramercy Park Investments v. Airfund International, No. 9722734B (Mass.Super. Ct.); Gramercy Park Investments v. The Krupp Realty Fund, No. 971612 (Mass.Super.Ct.); Geodyne Resources v. Gramercy Park W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 12 Investments, No. CJ9605548 (Dist.Ct.Okla.); Gramercy Park Investments v. Wells Real Estate Fund, No. 97A02413 (Ga.Super.Ct.); Gramercy Park Investments v. Swift Energy, No. 9661729 (Dist.Ct.Tex.); and Lexington Family Investments v. Dean Witter, No. 1521796 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.); actions brought on behalf of institutional investors in state courts throughout the nation demanding inspection of investor lists and other corporate and partnership information. Madison Partnership Liquidity Investors v. American Cable TV Investors, 97 Civ. 4950 (JSM) (S.D.N.Y.); and Madison Partnership Liquidity Investors v. PLM Equipment Growth Fund, 98 Civ. 4057 (JSM)(S.D.N.Y.); actions brought on behalf of institutional investors against fund management for improper defensive actions taken in response to investors acquisitions of large positions in funds. The Firm has also acted as special counsel to investors' committees in efforts to assert the investors interests without resort to litigation. For example, the Firm served as Counsel to the Courtyard by Marriott Limited Partners Committee for several years in its dealings with Host Marriott Corporation, and as Special Counsel to the Windsor Park Properties 7 and 8 limited partners to insure the fairness of their liquidation transactions. THE CLASS ACTION LITIGATION GROUP The qualifications of the attorneys in the Wolf Haldenstein Litigation Group are set forth below and are followed by descriptions of some of the Firms attorneys who normally practice outside the Litigation Group who contribute significantly to the class action practice from time to time. PARTNERS DANIEL W. KRASNER: admitted: New York; Supreme Court of the United States; U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth and Eleventh Circuits; U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, Central District of Illinois, and Northern District of Michigan. Education: Yeshiva College (B.A. 1962); Yale Law School (LL.B., 1965). Lecturer: Practicing Law Institute; Rutgers Graduate School of Business. Member: the Association of the Bar of the City of New York; Rockland County, New York State and American Bar Associations; Federal Bar Council. Mr. Krasner has lectured frequently before bar groups and has educated groups on securities laws and investors rights. His 13 W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP qualifications have received favorable judicial recognition on many occasions. See, e.g., Shapiro v. Consolidated Edison Co., [1978 Transfer Binder] Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) & 96,364 at 93,252 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) ("in the Court's opinion the reputation, skill and expertise of . . . [Mr.] Krasner, considerably enhanced the probability of obtaining as large a cash settlement as was obtained"); Steiner v. BOC Financial Corp., [1980 Transfer Binder] Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) & 97,656, at 98,491.4, (S.D.N.Y. 1980) ("This Court has previously recognized the high quality of work of plaintiffs' lead counsel, Mr. Krasner"). The New York Law Journal, August 1, 1983, at p. 5 (referring to Mr. Krasner as one of the "top rank plaintiffs' counsel" in the securities and class action fields.). FRED TAYLOR ISQUITH: admitted: New York; District of Columbia; Supreme Court of the United States; U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Second, Third, Fourth and Eighth Circuits; U.S. District Courts for the Southern, Eastern and Northern Districts of New York, District of Arizona, District of Colorado, Central District of Illinois, Western District of Michigan and District of Nebraska. Education: Brooklyn College of the City University of New York (B.A., 1968); Columbia University (J.D., 1971). Author, "Post Arbitration Remedies," for an Introduction to Securities Arbitration (NYSBA, 1994); "A Plaintiff's Lawyer Examines Limited Partnership Rollups for Real Estate Exit Strategies" (American Conference Institute, 1994); Federal Civil Practice Supplement, "Representative Actions," (NYSBA, 2000). "A Scalpel in Your Hand: Litigation as a Tool" (2002, SRI); "Anatomy of a Deposition . . . Complex Financial Case" (2002, NYC Bar); "The Seven Year Itch" (2003); "Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Tort Reform" (2004, SRI); "Ethics Going Astray By Small Steps" (2004); "A Flexible Approach to Loss Causation" (2005); "An SEC Monopoly Will Not Work" (Institutional Investors Services, 2007); Columnist for weekly column "From the Courts, for The Class Act, National Association of Securities and Class Action Attorneys. Lecturer, Panelist with the Antitrust Committee of the New York City Bar Association Regarding Private Equity Transactions and the Implications of the Supreme Court's Recent Decisions (2008); Developments in Class Actions; (NYSBA, 2007); IPO Tie In/Claims Seminar, Professional Liability Underwriter Society; Securities Arbitration New York State Bar Association; Real Estate Exit Strategies, American Conference Institute; Fundamental Strategies in Securities Litigation (NYSBA, CLE Program). He is an arbitrator with the American Arbitration Association and with the Civil Court of the City of New York and a mediator for the ADR Program of the Supreme Court, County of New York; W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 14 Complex Litigation Panel. Member: The Association of the Bar of the City of New York (Committee on Federal Courts; Committee on Antitrust); New York County Lawyers' Association (Former Chair: Business Tort/Consumer FraudTort Law Section); Brooklyn (Member: Committee on Civil Practice Law and Rules, 1983; Committees on Legislation and Federal Courts, 1984), New York State (Member: Committee on Legislation, Trial Lawyers Section, 1981 ); Committee on Securities, Commercial and Federal Litigation Section, 1989 ); Committee on Evidence (2007 ); and American (Member: Sections on: Litigation; International Law; Individual Rights and Responsibilities); Bar Associations; the District of Columbia Bar; and Legislation and Civil Practice Law and Rules Committee of the Brooklyn Bar Association; Vice President if the Institute for Law and Economic Policy. Mr. Isquith has been Chairman of the Business Tort/Consumer Fraud Committee of the Tort Law Section of the New York State Bar Association and is a member of that Association's Committees on Securities Law and Legislation. He also serves as a judge for the Moot Court Competition of Columbia University Law School and has served on Fordham University's National Competition. Mr. Isquith served as President of the National Association of Securities and Commercial Law Attorneys in 2003 and 2004. He is frequently quoted in the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, and other national publications. The April 1987 issue of Venture magazine listed Mr. Isquith as among the nation's top securities class action attorneys. In 2006, 2007 and 2008, Mr. Isquith was selected as among the top 5% of attorneys in the New York City metropolitan area chosen to be included in the Super Lawyers Magazine. He was also selected by Lawdragon in its list of attorneys. JEFFREY G. SMITH: admitted: New York; California; Supreme Court of the United States; U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and Ninth Circuits; U.S. Tax Court; U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, Southern and Central Districts of California and the Districts of Colorado and Nebraska. Education: Vassar College (A.B., cum laude generali, 1974); Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University (M.P.A., 1977); Yale Law School (J.D., 1978). At Yale Law School, Mr. Smith was a teaching assistant for the Trial Practice course and a student supervisor in the Legal Services Organization, a clinical program. Member: The Association of the Bar of the City of New York; New York State and American (Section on Litigation) Bar Associations; State Bar of California (Member: Litigation W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 15 Section). Mr. Smith has frequently lectured on corporate governance issues to professional groups of Fund trustees and investment advisors as well as to graduate and undergraduate business student groups, and regularly serves as a moot court judge for the A.B.A. and at New York University Law School. Mr. Smith has substantial experience in complex civil litigation, including class and derivative actions, tender offer, merger, and takeover litigation. Mr. Smith was recently named a New York Super Lawyer. FRANCIS M. GREGOREK: admitted: New York; California; U.S. Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia and Ninth Circuit; U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York, and Central, Southern and Northern Districts of California; Education: University of Virginia (B.A., with high distinction, 1975); New York University (J.D., 1978); Durham University, Durham, England. Phi Beta Kappa; Phi Alpha Theta. Member: State Bar of California; American Bar Association. MARY JANE FAIT: admitted: New York; Illinois; U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, and Northern District of Illinois; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Education: St. Johns College and University of Illinois (B.A., Economics, 1976); Cornell Law School (J.D., 1979). Member: Chicago Bar Association; Illinois Bar Association; Antitrust Division of the American Bar Association. PETER C. HARRAR: admitted: New York; U.S. District Courts for the Southern, Eastern and Northern Districts of New York. Education: Princeton University (A.B., with high honors, 1980); Columbia University (J.D., 1984). Phi Beta Kappa. Mr. Harrar has extensive experience in complex securities and commercial litigation on behalf of individual and institutional clients. LAWRENCE P. KOLKER: admitted: New York; U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second and Eleventh Circuits; U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, Western District of Michigan and the District of Colorado. Education: State University of New York at Binghamton (B.A., 1978); Brooklyn Law School (J.D., 1983). Editor, Brooklyn Law Review, 19821983. Panelist, Early Neutral Evaluator for the Eastern District of New York, 19921997. Lecturer, Brooklyn Law School, 1989. Assistant Corporation Counsel, City of New York, 19831987. Member: The Association of the Bar of the City of New York; New York State Bar 16 W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP Association. Mr. Kolker has spoken at numerous conferences of the Investment Program Association and the Strategic Research Institute concerning limited partnership tender offers and litigation strategies, and has published articles entitled "Litigation Strategies for Limited Partnership Tender Offers (February 1996) and Limited Partnership Five Percent Tender Offers" (October 1997) in Standard & Poor's Review of Securities and Commodities Regulation. Mr. Kolker has acted as lead counsel in numerous class and derivative actions asserting the rights of investors since joining Wolf Haldenstein in 1989. Mr. Kolker also counsels investment management firms in transactional and securities matters and represents them in corporate and business litigation. MARK C. RIFKIN: admitted: New York; Pennsylvania; New Jersey; U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, Fifth, and D.C. Circuits; U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, the Eastern and Western Districts of Pennsylvania, the District of New Jersey, the Eastern District of Wisconsin and the Western District of Michigan. Education: Princeton University (A.B., 1982); Villanova University School of Law (J.D. 1985). Contributor, PACKEL & POULIN, Pennsylvania Evidence (1987). Mr. Rifkin has extensive experience in complex class and derivative actions in securities, ERISA, antitrust, intellectual property, and consumer protection litigation. Mr. Rifkin has extensive trial experience in class and derivative actions, including In re National Media Corp. Derivative Litig., C.A. 907574 (E.D.Pa.), Upp v. Mellon Bank, N.A., C.A. No. 915229 (E.D.Pa.), where the verdict awarded more than $60 million in damages to the Class (later reversed on appeal, 997 F.2d 1039 (3d Cir. 1993)), and In re AST Research Securities Litigation, No. 941370 SVW (C.D. Cal.), as well as a number of commercial matters for individual clients. Mr. Rifkin has lectured before diverse business and professional organizations in the areas of securities and complex litigation and corporate governance, serves as a moot court judge for the A.B.A. and at New York University Law School, and is a frequent guest lecturer to graduate and undergraduate economics and finance students on corporate governance topics. MICHAEL JAFFE: admitted: California; New York; U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. Education: University of California at Berkeley (B.S., with highest distinction, 1982); Hastings College of the Law, University of California (J.D., 1987). Judicial Extern to the Honorable Thelton E. Henderson, Northern District of California, 17 W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 19861987. Member: The Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Languages: French. BETSY C. MANIFOLD: admitted: Wisconsin; New York; California; U.S. District Courts for the Western District of Wisconsin, Eastern and Southern Districts of New York, and Northern, Central and Southern Districts of California. Education: Elmira College; Middlebury College (B.A., cum laude, 1980); Marquette University (J.D., 1986); New York University. Thomas More Scholar. Recipient, American Jurisprudence Award in Agency. Member: The Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Languages: French. ALEXANDER H. SCHMIDT: admitted: New York; New Jersey; United States Supreme Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and the United States Court of Federal Claims. Education: State University of New York, Stony Brook (B.A., 1981); Brooklyn Law School (J.D., 1985). Mr. Schmidt concentrates on sophisticated commercial litigation, including matters involving antitrust, class actions, banking, commercial factoring, securities fraud, civil RICO, real estate, intracorporate and partnership disputes, and legal and accounting malpractice. His noteworthy, groundbreaking successes include Dresses For Less, Inc. v. CIT Group/Commercial Services, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18338; 20022 Trade Cas. (CCH) P73,828 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2002) (sustaining Sherman Act claims against commercial factoring industry); Atkins & OBrien L.L.P. v. ISS Intl Serv. Sys., 252 A.D.2d 446; 678 N.Y.S.2d 596 (1st Dep't 1998) (lawyers could recover future fees under estoppel exception to general rule that client can terminate relationship at any time as lawyers founded law firm and expended startup costs based on clients promises of future fees); Bank Brussels Lambert v. Credit Lyonnais (Suisse) S.A., 160 F.R.D. 437 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) (attorney client privilege held waived as to inadvertently disclosed documents not protected by "common interest" doctrine). Mr. Schmidt was an Assistant Adjunct Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School in 1998 and 1999, where he cotaught a seminar on Federal Discovery Practice. GREGORY M. NESPOLE: admitted: New York; U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. Education: Bates College (B.A., 1989); Brooklyn Law School (J.D., 1993). Member: The Association of the Bar of the City of New York; New York State Bar Association. Mr. Nespole's experience includes complex civil and criminal litigation. 18 W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP DAVID L. WALES: admitted: New York; District of Columbia; United States Court of Appeals for the Second and Fourth Circuits, the United States District Courts for the Southern, Eastern and Western Districts of New York, and the District of Columbia. Education: State University of New York, Albany (B.A., magna cum laude, 1984); Georgetown University Law Center, (J.D., cum laude, 1987); Notes and Comments Editor, Georgetown Journal of Law and Technology. Mr. Wales is a member of the Federal Bar Council and the Federal Courts Committee of the New York County Lawyers Association, and is AV rated by Martindale Hubbell and was recently named a New York Super Lawyer. Mr. Wales is an experienced trial and appellate attorney who specializes in handling complex securities and class action litigation. Mr. Wales was an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (19921998), where he specialized in investigating and prosecuting fraud and white collar criminal cases. Mr. Wales has personally tried more than 15 federal jury trials, and his recent trials include: (i) a jury verdict for more than $11 million, including $1 million in punitive damages, in a derivative action against the general partner of a hedge fund; and (ii) a multimillion dollar settlement with an accounting firm reached during trial of a class action. Mr. Wales has been lead or colead counsel in numerous securities class actions and derivative actions, including; In re General Motors Corp. Derivative Action, MDL No. 1749 (E.D. Mich. 2006) (pending derivative action); In re Sepracor Corp. Securities Litigation, C.A. No. 0212338 (D. Mass.) ($52,500,000 recovery in securities fraud class action); In Re Cablevision Systems Corp. Shareholder Derivative Action, 06cvDGTAKT (E.D.N.Y.) ($34.4 million settlement in a backdated stock option action); In re Luxottica Group S.p.A. Securities Litigation, CV013285 (E.D.N.Y.) ($18,250,000 recovery in a Williams Act case); In re Marque Partners L.P. Derivative Action, No. 01604724 (Sup. Ct., N.Y. Co.) ($11,000,000 jury verdict in a derivative action); In re Jennifer Convertibles Securities Litigation, CV945570 (E.D.N.Y.) ($9,550,000 recovery, part of the recovery obtained in the middle of trial); and In re Curative Health Services Securities Litigation, CV992074 (E.D.N.Y.) ($10,500,000 recovery in a securities fraud action). DEMET BASAR: admitted: New York; New Jersey; U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, Southern District of New York, and Eastern District of Wisconsin. Education: Fairleigh Dickinson University (B.A., summa cum laude, 1984), Phi Omega Epsilon; Rutgers University School of Law (J.D., 1990). Recipient, Wests Scholarship Award, Senior Notes and W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 19 Comments Editor, Rutgers Law Review. Member: The Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Languages: Turkish. ADAM J. LEVITT: admitted: Illinois; Supreme Court of the United States; U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First and Seventh Circuits; U.S. District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of Illinois, Northern District of Indiana, District of Nebraska, District of Colorado, and the Northern and Eastern Districts of Texas. Education: Columbia College, Columbia University (A.B., magna cum laude, 1990); Northwestern University School of Law (J.D., 1993). Member: American Law Institute (Members Consultative Groups: Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation, the Restatement of the Law (Third) Restitution and Unjust Enrichment, and the Restatement of the Law (Third) Torts: Liability for Economic Loss); Seventh Circuit Contributing Editor, Class Actions & Derivative Suits (ABA); Consulting Participant: "Calculation of Securities Litigation Damages" (National Association of Public Pension Attorneys, Securities Litigation Damages Calculation Taskforce). Publications: Foreign Investors Serving as Lead Plaintiffs in U.S.Based Securities Cases, International Practice Section Newsletter (Association of Trial Lawyers of America, Washington, D.C.), Winter 2004 and Spring 2005.; Proposed Rule 225: A Death Warrant for Class Actions in Illinois, 93 Illinois Bar Journal 202 (2005); The Big Business Wish List: Proposed Illinois Supreme Court Rule 225 and the Demolition of Consumer Rights, The Class Act (The Newsletter of the National Association of Securities and Consumer Law Attorneys), February 25, 2005; and An Illinois Lawyer's Guide to Service of Process in Mexico, 82 Illinois Bar Journal 434 (1994). Mr. Levitt has also testified before the Illinois Supreme Court Rules Committee on class action practice and related issues. Mr. Levitt regularly serves as a moot court judge in the Julius H. Miner Moot Court Competition, Northwestern University School of Law. In recognition of his achievements to date, Mr. Levitt was named one of the "40 Illinois Attorneys Under 40 Years Old to Watch" by the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin and the Chicago Lawyer. He is rated "AV" by Martindale Hubbell. Substantially all of Mr. Levitts practice is focused on complex commercial litigation and class action practice on both the trial and appellate court levels, in federal and state courts nationwide, in the areas of securities, consumer protection, technology, and agricultural law. Since 1993, Mr. Levitt has served as lead counsel, colead counsel, or in other leadership positions in numerous class and other complex litigations throughout the 20 W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP United States, including In re StarLink Corn Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1403 (N.D. Illinois) (recovered $110 million for U.S. corn farmers who sustained market losses arising from defendants' contamination of the U.S. food corn supply with an improperly bioengineered corn seed product); Court Reporting Services, et al. v. Compaq Computer Corporation, C.A. No. 02 CV 044 (E.D. Texas) (obtained full recovery, valued at not less than $35 million, on behalf of Compaq Presario purchasers with improperly partitioned hard disk drives); and various Internet privacy cases, including Supnick v. Amazon.com, Inc. (W.D. Wash.) and In re DoubleClick, Inc. Privacy Litigation (S.D.N.Y.). Mr. Levitt is currently colead counsel in a series of thirteen class action lawsuits against the Monsanto Company, Pioneer HiBred International, and E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, predicated upon those companies' alleged improper conduct arising from their sale of genetically engineered soybean and corn seeds or traits; is Class Counsel in In re Aon ERISA Litigation (ERISA class action lawsuit on behalf of all participants and beneficiaries of Aon's 401(k) savings plan against Aon and certain of its officers and directors, alleging that during the class period, defendants, as fiduciaries of the Plan, each violated ERISA by breaching their duties owed to plaintiffs and the other participants and beneficiaries of the Plan in connection with the Plan's holding of Aon stock); and was recently appointed Designated CoLead and CoInterim Class Counsel in In Re Genetically Modified Rice Litigation, MDL 1811 (E.D. Mo.), in which he is representing the interests of United States longgrain rice producers seeking to recover damages they sustained resulting from the contamination of the U.S. rice supply with unapproved, geneticallymodified rice seed traits developed and tested by Bayer CropScience LP and related entities. Mr. Levitt is also actively involved in the In re Initial Public Offering Sec. Litig., Master File No. 21 MC 92 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.) (consolidated action against 309 issuers and 55 underwriters alleging manipulation, misrepresentations, and omissions relating to the market for various hightech initial public offerings), and also recently served as lead counsel in In re Comdisco Securities Litigation (securities class action lawsuit against former Comdisco executives relating to Comdisco's misrepresentations and omissions with respect to its Prism division). Mr. Levitt also provides, or has provided legal services to various private companies involving complex litigation and general corporate matters. W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 21 THOMAS H. BURT: admitted: New York; U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. Education: American University (B.A., 1993); New York University (J.D., 1997). Articles Editor with New York University Review of Law and Social Change. RACHELE R. RICKERT: admitted: California; U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. Education: Point Loma Nazarene College (B.A., 1994); University of California, Hastings College of the Law (J.D., 1997). Member: State Bar of California. Former Deputy Alternate Public Defender for the County of San Diego. OF COUNSEL ROBERT ABRAMS: admitted: New York; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, Eastern District of Missouri, District of Maryland, and District of Delaware. Education: Haverford College (B.A., 1961); Columbia University (Ph.D., 1966), Brooklyn Law School (J.D., 1992). Woodrow Wilson Fellow; International Business Law Fellow. Adjunct Professor, Mediation Clinic, Brooklyn Law School, 19831984. Mr. Abrams was formerly a Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. Member: New York State Bar Association. Mr. Abrams is the author of books on the theory of collective choice (Columbia University Press) and voting theory (Sage), as well as articles on Soviet politics, game theory and bargaining and negotiations. He has focused his practice on complex securities, ERISA, and consumer actions. ROBERT B. WEINTRAUB: admitted: New York; Supreme Court of the United States; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal and Second Circuits; District of Columbia; U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. Education: Syracuse University (B.A., cum laude, 1972); Georgetown University Law Center (J.D., 1977). Member: 19751977, Articles Editor and Member: Executive Board, 19761977, Law and Policy in International Business, Georgetown International Law Journal. Assistant Editor, Competition Working Group, "The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: A Business Appraisal," 1977. Author, "Law Backs Women Warriors," National Law Journal, June 7, 1993. Cocontributor: Chapter 7, "The CellerKefauver Act of 1950," 4 Legislative History of the Federal Antitrust Laws and Related Statutes, edited by E. Kintner, Chelsea House Publishers, 1980. Mediator, U.S. District Court, Southern District of W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 22 New York. Member: The Association of the Bar of the City of New York (Member: Committee on Securities Regulation; Council on International Affairs; Chair, 19911994 and Member: 19871990, Committee on Military Affairs and Justice; International Arms Control and Security Affairs, 19901991); and American Bar Association. He has counseled corporations on contract negotiation and antitrust matters, and provided antitrust advice on mergers to the arbitrage department of a major brokerage house. He has served as an arbitrator for the NYSE, the NASD and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and as a mediator for the federal District Court in New York. Mr. Weintraub also previously served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of a brokerdealer investment bank which is a member of the NYSE, the NASD and other principal exchanges. Mr. Weintraub has particular experience in litigation involving investment firms and brokerdealers. GUSTAVO BRUCKNER: admitted: New York; New Jersey; United States District Courts for the Districts of New Jersey, Eastern District of New York, and the Southern District of New York; the United States Court of Appeals for Second Circuit and the Supreme Court of the United States. Education: New York University (B.S., 1988); New York University (M.B.A. 1989); Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University (J.D., 1992). A SSOCIATES THEODORE B. BELL: admitted: Michigan; Illinois; 7th Circuit Court of Appeals; United States District Courts for the Northern, Central and Southern Districts of Illinois. Education: University of Michigan (B.A., 1988); University of Detroit Mercy School of Law (J.D., 1992). MALCOLM T. BROWN: admitted: New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, District of New Jersey and Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Education: University of Pennsylvania (B.A., Political Science 1988) and Rutgers University School of Law (J.D. 1994). SCOTT J. FARRELL: admitted: New York; New Jersey; U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, the District of New Jersey, and the District of Colorado. Education: Yeshiva University (B.A., magna cum laude, 1996), where he was a Max Stern Scholar and Gruss 23 W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP Scholar; New York University School of Law (J.D., 1999), where he was an Article and Note Editor of the Journal of Legislation and Public Policy. He is the coauthor of "In re Gary Glass and Zoltan Guttman," CFTC Docket No. 934, Futures & Derivatives Law Report, July/August, 1998. KATE MCGUIRE: admitted: New York; U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. Education: University of California at Santa Cruz (B.A. 1995), Georgetown University Law Center (J.D., 1998); Member: Georgetown Immigration Law Journal. STACEY T. KELLY: admitted: New York; New Jersey; U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. Education: New York University (B.A., 1997); Rutgers School of Law Newark (J.D., 2000). Member: New York State Bar Association; New York County Lawyers Association PAULETTE S. FOX: admitted: New York; New Jersey U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. Education: Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law (J.D. 2001); Syracuse University (B.A. in Public Policy, summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, 1998). MATTHEW GUINEY: admitted: New York. Education: The College of William & Mary (B.A. in Government and Economics 1998); Georgetown University Law Center (J.D. 2002). MARTIN RESTITUYO: admitted: New York. Education: Queens College (B.A., 1998); Hofstra University School of Law (J.D. 2002); Hofstra University, Frank G. Zarb School of Business (M.B.A., Finance, 2005). Mr. Restituyo did postgraduate work at the Universidad Autonoma de Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo, in the Dominican Republic, and studied at Faculte de Droit de l'Universite de Nice, in Nice, France. Mr. Restituyo was the Assistant Town Attorney for North Hempstead, New York (20042006), an Adjunct Professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice (2005), and was in the Nassau County Department of Economic Development (20022004). In 2003, he was awarded the "Distinguished Alumni Award" from Hofstra University's Clinical Program. He is a member of the Nassau County Bar Association, the Women's Bar Association, the Hispanic Bar Association, the Dominican Bar Association and Hofstra University School of Law, Alumni Board. 24 W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP GEORGE T. PETERS: admitted: New York, U. S. District Courts for the Southern & Eastern Districts of New York. Education: Eastern Illinois University, B.A. 1991; attended Howard University School of Law and fulfilled remaining law studies at Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman and Herz LLP. Member of the New York State Bar Association. JOHN TANGREN: admitted: Illinois, the Northern District of Illinois and the District of Colorado. Education: The University of Chicago (A.B., Philosophy and Music, 2000) and the University of Chicago Law School with honors (J.D. 2003) where he was Executive Editor of the University of Chicago Legal Forum. Before joining Wolf Haldenstein, Mr. Tangren practiced complex commercial litigation as an associate in the Chicago office of a large global firm. His primary area of practice is class action litigation. PATRICK H. MORAN: admitted: Wisconsin, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Education: University of Iowa (B.A. Economics, 1999); Marquette University Graduate School of Business Administration (M.B.A., Accounting, 2004); Marquette University Law School (J.D. 2003), where he was a member of the Marquette University Law Review and published The Federal and Ninth Circuits Square Off: Refusals to Deal and the Precarious Intersection between Antitrust and Patent Law, 87 MARQ. L. REV. 387 (2003). Before joining Wolf Haldenstein, Mr. Moran served as a law clerk to the Hon. John L. Coffey of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. In addition, Mr. Moran has held positions with a big four accounting firm as an international tax consultant and as an associate for a large securities class action law firm, specializing in litigation concerning mergers and acquisition. RACHEL S. POPLOCK: admitted: New York, U.S. District Courts for the Southern & Eastern Districts of New York. Education: Cornell University (B.S. Human Development, 2002), Fordham Law School (J.D. 2005) where she was a member of the Fordham Urban Law Journal and received the Archibald R. Murray Public Service Award for her participation in the Family Advocacy Clinic. RUSSELL S. MINESS: admitted: New York, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Education: Cornell University (B.S., Industrial and Labor Relations, 2002); University of Pennsylvania Law 25 W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP School (J.D., 2005), where he was a Senior Editor of the Journal of International Economic Law. Before joining Wolf Haldenstein, Mr. Miness was an associate in the New York office of a large international law firm. Wolf Haldenstein partners who regularly provide their non-litigation expertise to class action litigation matters CHARLES H. BALLER: admitted: New York. Education: New York University (B.S., magna cum laude, 1954); Columbia University (LL.B., 1957); New York University (L.L.M., Taxation, 1962). Beta Gamma Sigma; Beta Alpha Psi. Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar. CoEditor and Contributing Author, April, 1981, with 1986 Supplement, Business Acquisitions, Practicing Law Institute. Member: The Association of the Bar of the City of New York; New York State and American Bar Associations. Mr. Baller has worked in the office of Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service (Interpretative Division). A lecturer and author for the Practicing Law Institute (coeditor of the reference work Business Acquisitions: Planning and Practice), Mr. Baller is a corporate and tax attorney with extensive expertise in mergers and acquisitions, complex estate planning (particularly relating to corporate and business holdings), and employee benefits and compensation, including ERISA. ERIC B. LEVINE: admitted: New York; U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second and Eleventh Circuits; U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, and Eastern District of Michigan; U.S. Tax Court. Education: State University of New York at Buffalo (B.A., summa cum laude, 1974); University of Pennsylvania (J.D., cum laude, 1977). Order of the Coif, Phi Beta Kappa. Associate Editor, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 19761977. Member: The Association of the Bar of the City of New York; New York State Bar Association. Mr. Levine's practice focuses on complex commercial and civil litigation, including in the area of bankruptcy and receivership litigation, creditors rights, and lender liability. MARK C. SILVERSTEIN: admitted: New York. Education: State University of New York at Binghamton (B.S., summa cum laude, 1980); New York University (J.D., cum laude, 1983). Order of the Coif. Editor, Journal of International Law and Politics, 19821983. Member: the Association of the Bar of the City of New York; New York State; American Bar Associations. Mr. Silverstein serves as general counsel to corporations and handles 26 W o lf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP matters involving tax planning and mergers and acquisitions. He also provides counseling in the structure of complex settlements and the administration of complex claims administrations. ELI D. GREENBERG: admitted: New York. Education: New York University (B.S., magna cum laude, 1981. New York University (J.D., 1984). Beta Gamma Sigma. Lecturer, New York University. Member: American Health Lawyers Association. Mr. Greenberg has extensive experience in pension, tax, benefits, and ERISA. SUBSTANTIAL RECOVERIES OBTAINED IN REPRESENTATIVE PAST CLASS ACTION CASES IN WHICH WOLF HALDENSTEIN WAS LEAD COUNSEL OR HAD ANOTHER SIGNIFICANT ROLE In re BankAmerica Corp. Securities Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1264 (JFN) (E.D. Mo.) (class recovered $490 million). In re Dynamic

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?