Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 1451

JOINT PRELIMINARY TRIAL REPORT. Document filed by Harel Insurance Company, Ltd., Pacific West Health Medical Center, Inc. Employee's Retirement Trust, PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants Netherlands N.V., Pricewaterhousecoopers L.L.P., Securities & Investment Company Bahrain, St. Stephen's School. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Witness List, #2 Exhibit B - Defendant's Witness List, #3 Exhibit C - Deposition Designations)(Barrett, David)

Download PDF
Exhibit C     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANWAR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Master File No. 09-cv-118 (VM) FAIRFIELD GREENWICH LIMITED, et al., Defendants. This Document Relates To: All Actions DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS Deponent: NAJLA AL SHIRAWI Date of Deposition: September 21, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 17:11 59:21 69:03 113:13 122:24 126:10 128:12 131:18 155:21 233:25 235:18 237:16 240:03 242:14 243:23 244:19 245:17 253:05 256:05 End 18:05 60:20 69:19 115:14 124:22 127:09 128:19 133:03 157:15 234:15 236:13 239:22 241:23 243:08 244:02 245:07 246:06 253:18 257:02 Objection(s) Calls for speculation (602) Calls for speculation (602) Counter-designation Defendants’ Designations: Start 13:4 End 13:19 14:14 15:18 18:6 19:3 22:13 14:20 16:7 18:24 19:13 22:18 25:12 25:22 26:20 27:3 31:11 32:18 35:9 38:22 32:3 33:16 35:22 39:4 41:15 52:22 53:17 60:21 61:7 62:11 63:9 63:21 65:2 66:20 66:24 67:18 69:20 70:21 71:18 72:17 73:14 75:15 75:24 76:23 78:23 79:4 81:12 81:25 42:13 53:8 53:25 61:2 61:15 63:3 63:14 64:2 65:14 66:22 67:13 68:25 70:9 71:6 72:5 72:21 73:21 75:16 76:13 77:5 79:1 79:11 81:15 82:8 Objection(s) Relevance; 403; Incomplete – if objections overruled, add 13:20-14:12 Counter-designation Incomplete – add 19:14-20:4 Relevance; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 22:11-12 Foundation; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 25:9-11 Foundation; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 27:4-10 Incomplete Incomplete Incomplete 32:10-17 35:23-36:22 39:5-9, 39:14-24, 41:2-14 Relevance, 403 Incomplete 65:15-24 Incomplete 69:1-2 Foundation Foundation Best Evidence Incomplete Incomplete Incomplete Incomplete 75:17-23 76:14-22 77:6-21 79:2-3 Incomplete 81:16-24 2 84:10 93:3 93:17 115:23 122:7 124:23 127:16 84:13 93:7 94:5 116:11 122:23 125:8 128:5 133:4 134:19 138:3 141:17 142:20 159:4 159:8 193:17 236:14 239:23 241:24 243:9 244:12 245:8 246:7 246:18 247:25 133:6 135:5 138:14 141:22 142:24 159:6 160:8 194:6 236:19 240:2 242:9 243:22 244:18 245:16 246:11 247:20 250:25 252:19 254:2 257:11 259:23 253:4 256:4 259:10 260:12 Incomplete Incomplete 93:8-16 94:6-9 Duplicative Mischaracterizes prior testimony Best Evidence; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 128:6-11 Incomplete 138:15-139:20 (?) 141:23-24 Incomplete 160:9-12; 161:2-13 Incomplete 236:20-237:3 Relevance and 403 (re 2002 investment); Incomplete – if objections overruled, add 247:21-24 Incomplete 259:11-22 Deponent: MARTIN BACH Date of Deposition: June 29, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 6:07 13:14 17:04 113:06 End 6:09 13:17 19:10 114:15 Objection(s) Non-responsive 3 Counter-designation Defendants’ Designations: Start 20:24 23:05 23:19 27:25 31:12 35:04 36:13 36:22 37:13 37:23 38:02 39:20 83:20 83:24 85:25 86:05 86:13 87:02 End 21:16 23:06 24:13 28:09 31:24 35:09 36:15 36:25 37:17 37:25 38:04 39:22 83:22 85:04 86:03 86:05 86:16 87:03 87:06 88:09 87:07 88:11 88:13 88:17 89:02 89:03 89:05 89:19 90:20 90:22 91:02 91:12 115:20 124:06 124:09 162:23 116:03 124:07 124:11 165:06 166:03 166:13 172:04 166:08 166:14 172:10 Objection(s) Counter-designation Incomplete Relevance (23:22-24:13) Incomplete 23:7-13 Incomplete Incomplete Form; Foundation; Vague/Ambiguous Incomplete 28:10-12 35:23-36:12 36:16-21 37:12; 37:18-22 Form; Leading Form; Leading Form; Foundation; Assumes facts not in evidence Form; Foundation; Assumes facts not in evidence Form; Foundation; Assumes facts not in evidence; Hearsay; Incomplete – if objections overruled, add 88:22-25, 90:14-19 Form; Foundation; Assumes facts not in evidence Form; Foundation; Assumes facts not in evidence; Hearsay Form; Foundation; Assumes facts not in evidence Form; Foundation; Assumes facts not in evidence; Hearsay Hearsay (163:18, 25; 164:7-8, 17, 2225); Incomplete Non-responsive – move to strike 4 165:7-9 179:17 180:18 185:21 191:07 191:17 194:09 194:24 195:02 196:05 196:18 196:21 197:04 199:17 179:24 180:24 186:04 191:10 191:25 194:10 194:25 195:04 196:14 196:19 196:23 197:18 199:25 Incomplete Non-responsive – move to strike Non-responsive – move to strike Incomplete Non-responsive – move to strike Relevance Hearsay; Relevance; 403; Foundation Form; Leading; Foundation Form; Leading; Foundation Hearsay; Relevance; 403; Foundation Incomplete 180:6-16 194:12 200:2-10 Deponent: MARTIN BACH Date of Deposition: June 30, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 382:04 384:23 406:11 420:07 478:10 480:23 486:13 490:12 494:03 500:05 End 382:24 385:13 407:16 422:25 480:16 486:11 490:06 493:16 498:25 502:20 Objection(s) Counter-designation Calls for expert testimony (701-703) Calls for expert testimony (701-703) Calls for expert testimony (701-703) Defendants’ Designations: Start 293:16 End 294:10 304:21 304:24 305:03 305:03 Objection(s) Relevance; 403 (293:16-17: “I think you might have been a little confused”); Foundation; Hearsay; Incomplete – if objections overruled, add 294:11-21 Form; Duplicative; Leading; Incomplete – if objections overruled, add 304:12-19 Form; Duplicative; Leading; Incomplete – if objections overruled, add 304:12-19 5 Counter-designation 369:08 370:07 370:11 383:16 370:04 370:09 370:11 384:03 384:05 384:15 386:09 387:05 386:15 387:06 387:08 387:09 393:20 394:17 397:10 397:14 397:16 397:13 397:14 397:18 397:20 398:19 402:24 403:18 406:03 425:25 426:06 427:06 427:18 428:15 433:11 433:24 444:11 445:04 445:18 445:25 446:06 447:02 447:07 447:14 452:23 453:09 455:14 455:17 455:25 456:05 456:12 403:16 403:18 403:10 426:03 426:23 427:15 428:11 428:20 433:16 434:07 444:23 445:6 445:23 445:25 446:18 447:04 447:07 447:16 453:07 453:22 455:14 455:21 456:02 456:10 456:17 Form; Duplicative; Leading Form; Duplicative; Leading Form; Duplicative; Leading Form; Foundation; Assumes facts not in evidence Form; Foundation; Assumes facts not in evidence Form; Compound Form; Foundation; Assumes facts not in evidence Form; Foundation; Assumes facts not in evidence Foundation; Assumes facts not in evidence Form; Foundation Form; Foundation Form; Foundation; Assumes facts not in evidence; Hearsay Form; Foundation; Assumes facts not in evidence; Hearsay Form; Leading; Duplicative Form; Leading; Duplicative Best Evidence Incomplete 434:8-15 Best Evidence Best Evidence Incomplete 6 456:18-457:10 457:12 466:17 466:21 468:24 469:04 469:06 469:09 470:08 470:20 471:12 471:17 471:19 472:02 476:08 476:12 476:14 476:18 476:20 476:24 477:02 516:25 457:22 466:19 466:21 469:02 469:04 469:07 470:05 470:08 471:03 471:14 471:17 471:23 472:14 476:10 476:12 476:16 476:18 476:22 476:24 477:17 517:07 Incomplete Incomplete 470:10-12 471:4-10 Relevance, 403; Incomplete – if objections overruled, add 517:8-10 Deponent: LIS BERGERON Date of Deposition: August 7, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 47:06 89:16 119:03 131:22 164:25 168:22 172:04 178:01 182:02 198:10 212:07 218:05 220:02 221:23 End 47:24 90:11 119:08 132:02 167:05 169:02 172:20 179:18 182:10 199:02 212:20 219:15 220:07 223:22 Objection(s) Foundation; Prejudicial 7 Counter-designation 225:04 228:03 229:23 232:01 237:10 239:15 245:24 247:18 249:17 254:01 256:01 257:18 261:10 263:18 276:02 285:13 285:25 286:22 287:17 292:02 293:20 294:25 298:06 300:09 301:16 303:06 303:24 225:24 228:11 230:19 235:01 237:21 239:21 247:07 249:06 251:10 254:06 256:20 258:08 261:24 264:14 278:19 285:16 286:12 287:09 290:19 292:10 293:24 295:17 299:03 300:14 302:21 303:20 304:11 Defendants’ Designations: Start 47:25 87:07 90:21 91:22 117:24 130:01 End 49:09 87:13 91:13 92:05 119:01 131:21 132:03 168:06 175:07 177:20 219:16 225:25 247:16 Objection(s) Counter-designation Incomplete Form; Speculation Speculation Speculation Non-responsive (move to strike 130:2023) 87:14-22 133:09 168:21 175:10 177:25 220:01 225:25 247:17 8 256:21 257:17 260:08 284:18 260:21 285:12 285:17 286:13 292:25 296:16 301:06 Non-responsive (move to strike 256:24257:1, 257:10-17) 285:24 286:19 293:06 296:20 301:11 Non-responsive (move to strike 285:11 beginning with “There were no …” through 285:12) Deponent: GIL BERMAN Date of Deposition: June 20, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 18:05 28:18 33:19 33:24 36:08 38:18 40:23 46:19 57:04 58:16 64:22 66:05 69:02 74:03 75:16 76:25 83:10 92:07 97:14 100:15 109:22 111:14 113:02 113:19 119:07 End 18:23 31:03 33:23 35:05 36:21 39:07 41:04 47:10 58:05 58:21 65:03 67:07 73:13 74:07 76:02 79:02 84:15 92:24 99:12 101:25 110:06 112:25 113:04 117:25 119:14 Objection(s) Lack of foundation 9 Counter-designation 120:23 122:05 141:08 147:24 150:10 152:11 161:11 170:05 176:17 177:21 188:10 190:11 190:20 191:02 198:16 200:19 201:24 213:13 215:13 219:06 220:02 234:13 240:22 244:13 245:09 259:13 260:23 274:17 276:10 121:05 132:13 145:13 149:05 150:15 153:17 163:08 170:25 176:25 181:18 189:05 190:19 190:25 197:07 200:12 201:23 213:05 214:04 217:14 219:25 220:06 235:18 241:10 244:23 245:17 260:17 261:15 275:23 276:18 276:20 276:23 276:25 279:07 279:02 284:11 284:21 287:13 290:02 294:13 296:15 298:04 298:13 301:11 304:06 307:13 294:07 295:14 298:02 298:11 301:05 303:25 307:02 309:25 Relevance (402, 403) Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation, calls for speculation (602) Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation, calls for speculation (602) Misleading (403) Lack of foundation (602); calls for expert testimony (701-703) Lack of foundation (602); Calls for speculation (602) Relevance (402, 403) Relevance (402, 403) Relevance (402, 403) Calls for speculation (602) Leading (611) Leading (611) Leading (611) 10 310:10 312:12 317:08 320:10 326:17 311:24 313:17 320:08 324:08 326:19 331:22 349:03 370:05 332:06 350:03 371:06 Leading (611) Leading (611); Relevance (402, 403) Leading (611) Relevance (402); Leading (611) Lack of foundation (602); Relevance (402) ; Compound Compound Argumentative (402, 403) Defendants’ Designations: Start 17:16 34:16 39:08 48:08 67:15 68:15 74:08 74:16 79:03 79:13 80:16 End 17:19 35:05 39:18 48:13 68:05 68:20 74:09 74:22 79:10 79:18 80:18 81:04 82:03 82:13 83:06 103:10 103:13 109:13 110:07 118:02 121:06 134:18 134:24 135:17 137:22 139:12 81:13 82:08 82:20 83:08 103:12 103:13 109:21 110:14 118:12 121:11 134:23 135:07 136:10 139:04 139:16 141:02 145:15 146:03 146:07 141:07 145:23 146:04 146:.7 Objection(s) Counter-designation Hearsay Foundation; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 80:19-81:2 Incomplete Incomplete Form; Vague/Ambiguous Form; Foundation; Vague/Ambiguous Form; Foundation; Vague/Ambiguous Incomplete Best Evidence; Question without answer Best Evidence Form; Vague/Ambiguous; Mischaracterizes the evidence Lacks personal knowledge (145:20-23) Form; Vague/Ambiguous Form; Vague/Ambiguous 11 82:9-12 82:21-83:5 109:12 149:06 163:09 173:16 176:12 182:11 198:02 200:13 214:05 217:05 221:14 229:05 232:12 235:19 241:11 243:08 244:24 150:04 163:18 173:24 176:16 182:18 198:08 200:15 214:08 217:14 221:20 229:25 232:16 237:08 241:24 244:12 245:08 245:18 250:23 251:09 251:14 246:21 251:06 251:09 251:25 253:02 253:12 258:07 258:16 253:09 253:12 258:10 259:02 259:05 259:05 261:16 261:22 261:25 262:06 262:17 263:03 263:06 263:06 263:08 263:12 264:09 263:09 263:16 264:20 264:23 264:23 265:03 265:18 Incomplete 175:23-176:11 Incomplete 197:25 Hearsay Relevance, 403 403 Relevance, 403 (241:17-24) Lacks personal knowledge, speculation, 403 (245:5-8) Incomplete Form; Foundation; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 252:20-25 Form; Vague/Ambiguous; Foundation; Speculation; Lacks personal knowledge Form; Vague/Ambiguous; Foundation; Speculation; Lacks personal knowledge Form; Foundation; Speculation; Lacks personal knowledge Form; Foundation; Speculation; Lacks personal knowledge Form; Foundation; Speculation; Lacks personal knowledge; 403 Form; Foundation; Speculation; Lacks personal knowledge; 403 Form; Vague/Ambiguous Form; Vague/Ambiguous Foundation; Lacks personal knowledge; Speculation; 403 Foundation; Lacks personal knowledge; Speculation; 403 Form; Foundation; Lacks personal knowledge; Speculation; 403 12 250:7-15 265:22 265:22 266:04 266:14 266:17 266:17 266:21 266:24 267:07 267:14 267:11 268:10 268:12 268:12 268:16 287:14 268:23 288:11 339:18 352:10 353:04 364:17 342:07 352:14 353:08 365:05 Form; Foundation; Lacks personal knowledge; Speculation; 403 Form; Foundation; Lacks personal knowledge; Speculation; 403 Form; Foundation; Lacks personal knowledge; Speculation; 403 Form; Mischaracterizes prior testimony 403 (267:9-11) Form; Foundation; Lacks personal knowledge; Speculation; 403 Form; Foundation; Lacks personal knowledge; Speculation; 403 403 Speculation, lacks personal knowledge (287:14-20); Hearsay (288:6-11) Form; Leading Relevance Deponent: ROBERT BLUM Date of Deposition: June 11, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 35:08 36:14 37:19 44:09 64:14 69:04 70:07 73:04 78:11 79:23 83:08 84:09 86:08 89:13 94:02 151:22 End 36:02 36:22 41:16 44:24 64:23 69:11 72:14 77:17 79:08 82:21 83:16 85:15 86:20 93:06 95:02 151:25 Objection(s) 13 Counter-designation 154:24 190:07 247:11 248:17 252:21 257:02 258:12 263:14 270:18 280:13 283:24 285:13 286:03 287:11 288:22 289:14 290:06 290:11 291:16 303:25 315:18 317:08 156:16 192:23 248:09 249:13 253:16 257:21 258:24 263:23 271:23 281:17 284:22 285:24 286:07 288:03 289:11 289:25 290:08 291:08 291:22 304:08 315:25 317:15 Defendants’ Designations: Start 50:05 52:19 53:20 54:06 56:08 58:16 62:12 62:22 64:24 65:21 End 50:10 53:16 54:04 55:03 58:06 58:21 62:19 62:22 65:17 66:10 68:20 72:15 72:23 96:24 68:22 72:21 73:03 97:08 97:23 98:05 Objection(s) 98:03 98:13 Speculation (move to strike 62:17-19) Speculation (move to strike 62:22) Form (66:5-10): non-responsive (move to strike 66:9-10, beginning with “I would have had to …”) Speculation; Lack of personal knowledge; Form 14 Counter-designation 100:02 100:18 101:12 102:23 104:24 100:05 101:02 102:21 104:21 104:24 120:24 122:03 121:08 122:12 124:03 131:06 131:20 132:12 126:16 131:14 131:24 134:12 138:06 138:11 139:03 139:06 138:09 138:23 139:03 139:10 139:12 142:10 144:07 147:16 152:04 154:19 162:13 165:13 165:17 166:21 167:02 139:12 144:05 144:07 149:13 152:16 154:23 162:16 165:14 166:18 166:23 167:02 178:09 197:13 199:08 200:18 253:17 291:23 316:02 179:09 198:11 200:09 201:19 253:21 291:25 316:15 Form Form Form (corresponding with form objection to question) Incomplete (no question, move to strike 122:3-5) Incomplete 131:15-19 Best evidence; Lack of Personal Knowledge; Speculation Form; Speculation; Lack of Personal Knowledge Form Best Evidence Foundation; Form Foundation; Form (in conjunction with predicate question) 199:12-199:7 Non-responsive (move to strike 201:19) Deponent: RENGER BOONSTRA Date of Deposition: April 25, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: 15 Start 5:21 6:11 7:17 8:12 10:24 12:04 12:22 14:17 21:09 21:17 21:22 22:02 34:10 34:19 35:11 37:18 39:11 39:15 40:23 49:07 49:20 49:21 53:04 55:13 56:02 56:13 59:24 61:09 61:14 63:24 64:13 66:12 66:23 67:16 67:25 68:23 69:16 70:18 70:24 76:23 77:16 78:16 94:15 End 5:24 7:03 8:03 9:15 11:20 12:13 13:09 15:02 21:15 21:20 21:25 22:04 34:16 34:19 36:03 38:02 39:13 40:21 40:24 49:11 49:20 49:23 53:22 55:24 56:11 56:13 60:04 61:12 61:14 64:03 64:13 66:20 67:14 67:17 68:09 69:14 70:02 70:22 71:23 77:13 77:20 78:23 94:24 Objection(s) Foundation; Prejudicial; Vague Foundation; Prejudicial; Vague Foundation; Prejudicial; Vague 16 Counter-designation 97:08 111:09 113:15 99:07 112:08 113:20 113:22 113:22 163:14 163:23 166:13 199:05 199:15 254:12 255:08 255:17 273:09 273:15 273:24 163:20 164:11 166:16 199:11 199:17 255:03 255:12 255:25 273:12 273:15 274:05 Foundation; Prejudicial; Vague; Confusing Foundation; Prejudicial; Vague; Confusing Defendants’ Designations: Start 15:11 20:10 23:09 23:13 30:02 30:12 31:23 32:25 254:09 256:13 258:07 268:11 269:20 270:04 270:10 271:02 271:10 271:18 272:12 274:06 275:09 End 16:18 20:21 23:11 23:24 30:03 30:15 32:23 33:03 254:11 256:24 258:12 269:15 269:22 270:07 270:10 271:03 271:14 272:09 272:17 275:07 275:13 Objection(s) Hearsay (16:1-18) Lack of Personal Knowledge Lack of Personal Knowledge Lack of Personal Knowledge Lack of Personal Knowledge Lack of Personal Knowledge Lack of Personal Knowledge Lack of Personal Knowledge Lack of Personal Knowledge Deponent: 17 Counter-designation RENGER BOONSTRA Date of Deposition: November 20, 2014 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 5:12 11:16 14:13 16:22 17:10 18:19 20:02 20:16 20:24 21:16 21:21 22:08 24:08 27:16 32:16 39:16 42:25 63:09 114:23 115:21 126:18 129:03 130:08 133:05 135:21 149:20 155:08 End 5:15 11:23 15:02 17:06 17:20 19:24 20:13 20:22 21:13 21:20 22:06 24:06 24:08 29:13 33:10 40:07 43:10 64:16 115:10 119:12 128:18 130:03 130:15 134:18 136:11 150:24 155:17 Objection(s) Counter-designation Objection(s) Best Evidence Counter-designation Defendants’ Designations: Start 17:21 43:13 66:05 67:13 67:20 68:06 End 18:11 44:17 67:10 67:13 68:04 68:14 Deponent: 18 ANUSCHKA COVA Date of Deposition: July 26, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 6:25 10:04 14:08 15:14 57:18 End 7:03 10:06 15:05 15:22 57:25 72:21 73:02 93:11 93:23 94:03 94:09 94:13 95:17 96:12 96:23 97:03 97:09 97:15 97:20 97:23 144:12 145:09 149:22 151:19 152:02 192:20 231:12 234:15 235:03 239:04 239:10 240:11 240:16 241:15 247:15 247:25 248:06 264:25 Objection(s) 72:25 73:12 93:21 94:01 94:07 94:11 95:04 96:09 96:15 97:01 97:05 97:13 97:18 97:21 98:03 145:03 145:13 150:05 152:01 152:05 192:25 231:23 235:01 235:14 239:07 240:01 240:14 241:14 241:24 247:22 248:04 248:25 265:03 Foundation; Prejudicial; Vague; Confusing 19 Counter-designation 265:06 271:14 272:12 272:22 275:19 276:17 276:23 277:24 279:06 280:08 283:10 284:08 284:12 285:05 285:15 288:06 289:10 291:08 308:17 308:22 310:16 311:01 311:04 311:08 311:25 312:16 270:06 272:10 272:20 272:25 276:08 276:22 277:22 279:03 279:11 280:18 284:06 284:10 285:03 285:05 286:08 289:07 289:14 291:16 308:20 309:16 310:25 311:02 311:06 311:23 312:14 312:17 Defendants’ Designations: Start 98:09 99:02 99:11 145:04 157:16 159:17 235:20 236:03 236:05 279:19 286:09 287:19 End 98:18 99:08 99:11 145:08 159:09 159:20 235:24 236:03 236:09 279:24 287:17 287:22 303:12 303:24 Objection(s) 303:23 304:01 Counter-designation Form; Foundation Compound; Form Incomplete Compound; Form Best Evidence Form Speculation; Lack of Personal Knowledge 20 159:16 305:02 306:16 308:01 308:15 309:17 305:11 307:03 308:13 308:15 310:08 Best Evidence; Incomplete Best Evidence Best Evidence; Form 305:12 Best Evidence Deponent: ANTHONY DELL’ARENA Date of Deposition: January 23, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 20:24 21:19 63:14 65:19 71:04 112:19 118:11 119:21 182:06 240:11 245:04 247:20 249:04 250:15 251:10 251:20 254:02 254:21 255:22 257:14 261:11 End 21:11 22:21 64:11 66:04 71:20 112:22 118:21 120:06 183:19 243:21 246:08 248:14 250:13 251:07 251:18 252:02 254:11 255:03 257:02 258:10 263:18 264:20 267:10 273:17 275:15 276:06 277:10 281:04 266:16 271:15 274:15 276:04 276:21 278:02 284:22 286:06 Objection(s) 286:19 258:2-10 Foundation; Speculation; Prejudicial Foundation; Speculation; Prejudicial Foundation; Speculation; Prejudicial; Calls for Legal Conclusion 21 Counter-designation 287:11 290:20 292:07 293:08 310:15 311:10 339:16 340:02 287:14 291:08 292:23 293:14 311:04 312:06 339:23 340:23 Defendants’ Designations: Start 56:02 End 56:06 56:08 57:16 60:22 61:07 61:11 61:24 62:15 62:24 63:10 66:05 68:05 68:24 71:21 73:22 76:17 77:05 77:14 78:13 80:14 81:17 57:13 57:21 61:02 61:08 61:20 62:06 62:22 63:08 63:10 67:23 68:22 69:02 72:12 74:19 77:02 77:05 77:19 78:23 80:18 83:17 84:13 84:20 86:03 86:08 87:10 89:13 90:02 90:16 92:06 96:22 84:15 85:22 86:05 86:17 87:24 89:22 90:09 91:18 92:16 97:06 Objection(s) Form; Move to strike 56:2-56:3 (ending with “little bit then.”) Counter-designation Form Form Form Form Form Form Form (76:25-77:2) Form Non-responsive (move to strike 81:2583:17) Form Form (84:20-22) Form Form; Compound; Incomplete Foundation; Speculation (89:20-22) Foundation; Speculation Foundation; Form 22 87:25-88:2 97:13 98:06 99:19 102:18 102:24 103:25 105:05 105:22 107:12 107:17 108:14 110:06 113:03 114:14 116:12 116:17 117:06 120:09 122:22 124:05 125:18 128:12 130:24 132:03 134:14 137:05 138:16 139:09 142:07 143:15 145:08 145:22 146:06 146:24 147:07 147:10 147:19 147:24 149:17 150:04 156:11 156:14 158:08 98:03 98:12 100:14 102:21 103:23 104:18 105:19 105:22 107:15 108:12 109:21 110:15 113:17 114:17 116:15 116:17 118:05 120:24 123:14 125:15 126:08 129:05 131:17 134:09 135:25 138:05 139:07 139:25 143:12 143:16 145:17 145:24 146:22 147:04 147:08 147:15 147:21 149:09 149:17 151:11 156:11 156:21 158:16 159:11 Best Evidence; Form 160:12 Best Evidence Form Form (103:3-4, 103:7-8, 103:16-23) Form (104:4-5, 104:18) Form; Compound Form Form Form Form Form Form Form (129:3-4) Form; Compound; Best Evidence Form Form Form Speculation; Leading Compound; Form Form; Assumes Facts Not in Evidence Form Form; Assumes Facts Not in Evidence Form Form; Leading Compound; Form Foundation; Form Form (move to strike commentary at 158:8-9) 23 161:02 162:06 162:19 166:03 167:19 171:25 172:18 175:09 175:18 176:08 177:10 177:23 183:20 184:14 184:20 185:11 187:07 187:20 188:12 189:05 189:08 192:10 206:06 209:19 211:12 214:08 215:19 218:15 218:21 223:19 225:13 161:17 162:12 163:10 166:06 168:02 172:14 174:05 175:16 175:21 177:04 177:17 177:24 184:11 184:18 184:22 186:09 187:12 188:08 189:03 189:06 189:12 193:20 206:25 210:08 212:06 214:13 216:07 218:19 219:15 224:07 226:02 226:04 226:14 226:21 228:10 255:04 287:15 287:18 317:09 320:02 323:10 323:19 323:24 324:09 228:03 229:09 255:07 287:16 287:20 318:23 320:05 323:17 323:22 323:24 325:13 Form Form Leading; Form Form Foundation Leading; Form; Compound Form Compound; Form Form Form Compound; Form Form; Speculation Incomplete; Form Speculation; Form Best Evidence Form Form Leading; Form Compound; Form Speculation; Lack of Personal Knowledge; Form Speculation; Lack of Personal Knowledge; Form Leading; Form Leading; Form Leading; Form Form Form Leading; Form 24 189:7 325:17 326:06 326:11 326:22 327:10 327:19 328:19 328:25 326:17 326:23 327:17 328:06 328:23 329:10 329:12 329:13 Form; Speculation; Lack of Personal Knowledge Form Form Form; Lack of Personal Knowledge Leading; Lack of Personal Knowledge; Form Form Deponent: SUSAN GEIGEL Date of Deposition: June 26, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 11:21 12:22 14:06 16:08 19:18 21:06 22:07 23:02 30:21 33:13 34:17 35:10 36:16 37:07 40:15 42:03 42:14 44:18 49:19 52:07 59:25 61:07 63:07 64:16 65:22 66:17 End 11:25 14:02 16:02 16:25 20:23 21:13 22:22 30:10 32:10 34:09 35:06 36:08 36:21 37:15 41:02 42:10 44:07 45:17 49:23 52:12 60:09 61:11 63:10 65:16 66:10 66:21 Objection(s) 25 Counter-designation 74:22 75:07 77:02 86:04 75:04 75:08 78:17 91:25 106:18 145:08 148:02 148:16 150:03 154:04 106:22 146:06 148:06 149:15 150:07 154:24 160:17 164:03 164:19 170:11 172:02 165:10 171:25 174:02 Relevance (402, 403) Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Misleading; Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Calls for speculation (602) Misleading (402, 403) Lacks foundation (602); calls for speculation (602) Lack of foundation (602); Hearsay (801, 802) Misleading; incomplete (402, 403) Leading (611) Misleading (402, 403); Lacks foundation (602) Defendants’ Designations: Start 17:21 49:05 50:23 52:13 52:19 52:25 53:08 54:23 55:08 55:14 56:06 56:09 57:05 59:25 61:07 66:24 67:17 68:03 68:07 69:08 70:02 End 17:23 49:13 51:02 52:16 52:19 53:05 53:08 55:02 55:08 55:16 56:07 57:02 57:08 60:09 61:11 67:10 67:19 68:04 68:07 69:24 70:05 Objection(s) Counter-designation Relevance; FRE 403 Relevance; FRE 403 Relevance; FRE 403 Relevance; FRE 403 Form Incomplete Foundation Relevance 26 57:3 70:08 75:09 76:04 76:09 81:15 102:04 104:22 105:15 106:10 127:24 130:07 130:21 132:10 140:23 141:03 142:03 142:14 146:22 147:04 150:18 150:23 152:02 165:11 165:14 70:12 75:16 76:07 76:25 81:20 104:15 104:23 105:25 106:17 128:15 130:09 131:16 132:20 140:25 141:03 142:08 142:18 147:02 147:04 150:21 150:24 152:25 165:12 165:16 Form Form Incomplete; Form Incomplete; Form Incomplete Form Form Form 147:5 Deponent: FRED GERTSEN Date of Deposition: November 13, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 13:12 14:13 21:12 23:17 24:07 25:10 27:02 28:11 29:21 31:24 33:12 35:10 End 13:14 16:05 22:13 24:05 24:25 25:12 28:05 28:15 30:06 32:24 33:23 36:04 Objection(s) Relevance (402, 403) Relevance (402, 403) Confusion of the issues (402, 403) Confusion of the issues (402, 403) Confusion of the issues (402, 403) Confusion of the issues (402, 403) 27 Counter-designation 36:10 36:21 44:25 46:02 47:24 49:06 54:02 62:14 69:24 71:08 74:24 80:02 81:19 85:05 36:12 40:18 45:25 46:14 48:02 53:22 62:09 62:23 71:02 74:19 79:16 80:20 84:21 87:02 87:23 89:07 89:03 90:02 90:04 90:16 90:07 95:10 96:07 98:24 100:06 106:19 108:21 98:17 99:14 101:04 106:22 110:24 111:14 113:09 124:02 130:10 111:25 123:15 128:14 134:09 135:08 139:17 143:09 145:25 147:10 136:19 142:25 144:25 146:24 147:25 148:04 152:20 154:03 149:08 153:07 155:06 158:02 160:04 Lack of foundation (402, 403, 602) Hearsay (801, 802) Lack of foundation, calls for speculation, assumes facts not in evidence (402, 403, 602); Assumes facts not in evidence (402, 403, 602) Argumentative, improper characterization of the facts (402, 403) Calls for speculation (402, 403, 602) Argumentative (402, 403) Assumes facts not in evidence (402, 403, 602) Argumentative (402, 403) Improper characterization of the evidence (402, 403) Lack of foundation, assumes facts not in evidence (403, 403, 602) Argumentative, Improper characterization of the facts (402, 403) 28 160:08 162:20 165:23 170:12 162:11 163:08 169:17 174:16 176:18 180:22 183:22 184:09 187:25 188:17 191:04 193:09 195:03 196:07 195:08 197:03 201:18 202:04 201:25 206:12 207:06 207:23 209:09 212:02 213:05 214:07 207:11 208:23 211:14 212:12 213:12 220:02 221:17 223:24 225:02 222:04 224:25 225:12 225:17 228:14 240:22 242:19 246:21 249:17 250:25 259:25 260:20 272:10 242:17 243:15 247:13 249:22 253:02 260:08 260:24 273:18 Improper characterization of the evidence (402, 403) Improper characterization of the evidence (402, 403) Improper characterization of the evidence (402, 403) Improper characterization of the evidence (402, 403) Improper characterization of the evidence, argumentative (402, 403) Improper characterization of the evidence (402, 403) Improper characterization of the evidence (402, 403) Calls for speculation (402, 403, 602) Improper characterization of the evidence (402, 403) Assumes facts that are not in evidence, improper characterization of the evidence (402, 403, 602) Improper characterization of the evidence (402, 403) Argumentative (402, 403) 29 274:24 286:04 275:21 287:11 Argumentative (402, 403) Defendants’ Designations: Start 7:21 End 10:15 20:18 25:13 28:06 21:11 26:25 28:10 28:16 29:06 30:07 31:20 32:25 34:02 36:05 40:25 33:10 35:09 36:09 44:24 46:15 48:03 54:02 81:05 102:17 47:09 48:12 54:24 81:09 102:21 103:05 103:14 108:03 108:09 134:21 135:07 175:20 181:22 184:10 176:17 183:20 185:21 185:25 187:19 189:02 189:11 Objection(s) Relevance (8:20-24); Non-responsive – move to strike (9:18-10:2); FRE 602 (9:18-10:2) Vague/Ambiguous Non-responsive – move to strike; Vague/Ambiguous Non-responsive – move to strike (28:2329:6); Speculation [not incomplete, but should have designated these lines] Counter-designations 31:21-23 Incomplete 33:24-34:1 Non-responsive – move to strike (43:220) Incomplete 47:10-13 Incomplete Non-responsive – move to strike Non-responsive – move to strike; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 101:21-102:16, 102:22-103:4 Non-responsive – move to strike (sentence at 103:11-14) Non-responsive – move to strike; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 107:19-108:2 Non-responsive – move to strike (everything after “That is correct” at 135:4-7) Incomplete Non-responsive – move to strike (185:16-21) Non-responsive – move to strike; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 185:22-24, 187:20-24 Non-responsive – move to strike; 30 53:23-25 175:12-16 190:22 191:03 194:20 195:22 195:02 196:06 197:08 200:13 198:05 200:20 229:09 229:23 231:03 232:05 233:11 244:23 231:16 232:11 233:17 245:20 254:02 254:16 255:09 256:09 257:19 260:09 260:25 262:03 264:14 274:16 281:04 255:13 257:09 259:20 260:19 261:17 262:07 264:20 274:20 281:14 283:19 284:16 284:03 284:23 Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 188:23-25 Non-responsive – move to strike; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 190:18-21 Non-responsive – move to strike (everything after “No”); Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 195:9-21 Incomplete Non-responsive – move to strike; Vague/Ambiguous; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 200:8-12 Non-responsive – move to strike (229:15-23); Incomplete Non-responsive – move to strike Incomplete Non-responsive – move to strike (244:23-245:7); FRE 602; Speculation; Foundation; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 244:20-22 Incomplete 197:4-7 228:19-229:8 232:12-233:10 Incomplete 253:24-25; 254:17255:5 255:14-18 Incomplete 259:21-24 Incomplete Incomplete Duplicative Incomplete Non-responsive – move to strike; FRE 602; Speculation Incomplete Non-responsive – move to strike; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 284:4-15 261:18-23 261:24-262:2 Deponent: CORNELIUS HAGE Date of Deposition: October 16, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: 31 274:21-23 283:13-18 Start 14:03 23:01 25:03 32:17 42:01 42:15 44:04 50:05 End 14:21 23:17 25:14 33:25 42:05 43:01 45:07 51:19 52:07 60:08 61:09 94:10 99:17 100:22 101:11 107:10 108:11 116:16 53:04 60:22 61:20 94:13 99:24 101:06 101:25 108:05 109:25 117:23 118:02 119:07 119:22 122:07 119:02 119:09 120:09 122:14 122:21 124:19 126:04 128:03 131:01 134:24 138:06 141:04 145:08 147:16 154:01 158:12 160:03 162:13 163:05 123:24 125:14 127:12 128:24 131:22 135:03 138:08 144:25 145:12 148:16 158:05 159:06 162:03 162:19 164:14 165:13 Objection(s) 165:22 Misleading. Confuses the issues. Mischaracterizes prior testimony. Calls for speculation. Assumes facts not in evidence. Vague. Argumentative. Misleading. Prejudicial. Argumentative. Misleading. Mischaracterizes prior testimony. Prejudicial. Argumentative. Asked and answered. Calls for speculation. Confuses the issues. Improper characterization of the facts. Prejudicial. 32 Counter-designation 166:08 166:14 167:06 168:21 167:10 170:06 173:24 174:15 178:17 182:02 183:10 184:17 185:24 201:07 202:22 213:04 179:18 182:17 183:17 185:16 186:14 201:25 203:07 213:20 213:22 215:22 217:07 218:03 220:09 221:01 223:17 225:06 228:25 231:02 232:13 234:11 234:19 Argumentative. Improper characterization of the facts. Prejudicial. 213:22 216:02 217:14 218:12 220:17 222:01 223:21 226:03 228:25 231:18 232:23 234:14 234:24 Argumentative. Mischaracterizes prior testimony. Prejudicial. Argumentative. Mischaracterizes prior testimony. Prejudicial. Argumentative. Improper characterization of the facts. Prejudicial. Defendants’ Designations: Start 20:22 27:01 28:15 37:19 46:18 End 22:06 27:15 29:07 38:01 46:21 47:17 47:19 47:25 48:10 Objection(s) Relevance Relevance Relevance Incomplete Non-responsive – Move to strike; Incomplete– if objection overruled, add 46:14-17 Non-responsive – Move to strike; Incomplete– if objection overruled, add 47:11-14 Non-responsive – Move to strike 47:2548:5 33 Counter-Designation 38:2-4; 38:13-21 76:06 77:12 76:22 77:19 Deponent: ERIC HARTKAMP Date of Deposition: November 28, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 12:11 21:11 22:10 23:03 End 12:17 21:17 22:22 24:13 25:02 27:15 26:13 28:18 29:07 31:13 32:23 34:18 35:04 36:17 37:10 40:12 44:06 47:08 49:05 50:12 52:19 29:25 32:16 33:14 34:24 35:22 36:25 39:08 41:13 44:24 48:16 50:07 51:06 55:14 57:02 58:02 61:25 63:11 68:12 70:14 72:22 57:16 61:10 62:22 67:25 70:08 70:18 73:20 82:11 85:11 82:18 85:17 Objection(s) Calls for speculation, confusion of the issues (402, 403, 602) Mischaracterizes prior testimony. Argumentative. Prejudicial. (402, 403) Mischaracterizes prior testimony. Improper characterization of the facts. Argumentative. Prejudicial. (402, 403) Mischaracterizes prior testimony. Improper characterization of the facts. Prejudicial. (402, 403) Calls for speculation (402, 403, 602) 34 Counter-designation 85:24 88:12 94:20 87:07 89:20 96:05 96:18 100:14 102:24 97:03 101:05 103:13 104:05 107:23 105:22 108:14 109:19 110:06 111:24 113:09 112:14 115:04 118:06 119:05 122:14 124:09 125:05 125:17 131:24 132:13 133:13 135:23 139:08 141:13 144:12 148:22 152:08 166:21 135:04 136:07 139:16 143:20 144:21 149:23 163:02 170:25 171:06 172:18 173:13 172:08 172:23 174:15 Asked and answered, misleading, lack of foundation (402, 403, 602); Misleading, improper characterization of the evidence, argumentative, prejudicial (402, 403) Calls for speculation, witness later corrected testimony therefore Relevance and misleading (402, 403) Asked and answered, calls for speculation (402, 403) Lack of foundation, misleading, assumes facts not in evidence, asked and answered (402, 403, 602) Improper characterization of the facts. Confuses the issues. Prejudicial. Calls for speculation. (402, 403) Calls for speculation, improper characterization of the facts, assumes facts not evidence (402, 403, 602) Argumentative, improper characterization of the facts, confusion of the issues, calls for speculation (402, 403, 602) Calls for speculation, asked and answered (402, 403, 602) Lack of foundation (402, 403, 602) Lack of foundation (402, 403, 602) Improper characterization of the facts, assumes facts not in evidence, calls for speculation, lack of foundation (402, 403, 602) 35 175:18 177:25 179:15 180:06 186:20 192:14 177:03 179:02 179:25 184:20 188:23 193:10 193:13 194:21 195:08 197:06 197:25 199:11 200:12 202:10 205:16 207:13 209:17 211:24 213:06 214:24 219:02 224:05 225:16 227:08 231:05 234:14 238:07 241:20 244:21 195:22 197:16 198:14 200:05 202:02 204:19 206:23 208:22 211:02 212:21 214:15 218:13 219:20 225:08 226:15 230:03 233:22 236:02 240:08 244:07 245:10 245:19 246:17 251:19 260:21 263:09 269:18 270:20 275:07 276:08 277:08 277:25 246:10 248:20 252:10 261:06 263:19 270:02 270:21 276:05 276:18 277:17 279:23 Calls for speculation (402, 403) Argumentative, asked and answered, improper characterization of the facts, misleading, confusion of the issues (402, 403) Calls for speculation. Improper characterization of the facts. Prejudicial. (402, 403) Calls for speculation, misleading, confusion of the issues (402, 403, 602) Calls for speculation (602) 36 279:24 281:02 282:19 285:02 280:17 281:20 283:12 286:13 Defendants’ Designations: Start 6:11 10:02 12:06 12:18 14:02 16:22 36:09 End 6:16 11:04 12:10 12:25 14:11 16:25 36:16 37:02 43:15 45:18 52:02 56:18 68:04 74:04 88:05 92:25 97:04 103:14 108:15 112:15 37:06 44:05 46:13 52:06 56:20 70:13 74:07 88:11 93:09 97:15 104:04 108:17 113:08 115:05 115:16 116:08 115:10 115:24 116:16 148:03 177:10 186:04 148:21 177:21 186:19 196:06 223:10 225:09 197:05 223:20 225:15 Objection(s) Counter-designations Incomplete 9:22-25 Non-responsive – Move to strike; FRE 602; Speculation Incomplete 45:13-17 Incomplete 56:9-17 Incomplete Incomplete Non-responsive – Move to strike Relevance (97:8-15) 73:25-74:3 87:22-88:4 Non-responsive – Move to strike (112:15-21) Incomplete Incomplete Incomplete Non-responsive – Move to strike (186:410); Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 185:22-186:3 Incomplete Incomplete Deponent: 37 115:25-116:7; 116:1722 147:23-148:2 177:22-24 196:2-5 223:5-9, 223:21-23 NATALIA HATGIS Date of Deposition: June 24, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 20:14 25:07 35:05 47:13 48:25 65:14 66:07 68:18 74:12 80:13 115:19 117:04 117:21 124:12 146:25 151:05 156:17 159:03 168:09 172:12 186:21 194:06 223:25 229:20 234:18 239:24 272:25 277:11 278:18 279:05 280:15 292:24 334:11 351:06 353:18 354:12 370:09 372:02 End 22:04 26:03 36:09 47:21 50:02 65:18 67:16 69:08 79:20 80:22 115:23 117:11 119:07 125:02 147:25 152:04 157:24 159:22 169:07 172:24 187:24 194:14 226:06 230:08 236:18 242:16 274:04 278:08 278:25 280:10 281:11 294:14 335:19 352:02 353:24 354:22 371:02 372:10 Objection(s) Speculation (118:24-119:08) Speculation. 38 Counter-designation Defendants’ Designations: Start 11:14 31:18 83:05 169:08 202:05 205:04 207:23 243:22 End 12:19 32:06 84:06 169:10 202:11 205:10 208:03 244:20 262:02 278:09 312:10 352:08 352:21 355:07 360:11 361:05 364:04 364:23 374:19 262:20 278:11 313:06 352:13 352:23 355:11 360:19 361:20 364:11 365:12 376:04 377:13 378:04 377:19 378:09 Objection(s) Counter-designation Form; Incomplete Predicate; Foundation Incomplete; No Question Predicate 243:13 beginning with “what” through 243:16 Form Leading; Form Leading; Form Incomplete; No Question Predicate Leading; Form; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add: 377:20-22 Deponent: DEREK HATOUM Date of Deposition: August 14, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 30:23 36:05 38:10 43:05 45:01 49:04 49:25 50:22 57:05 57:24 End 31:09 36:25 38:20 43:15 45:04 49:10 50:05 51:18 57:09 58:03 Objection(s) 39 Counter-designation 60:11 61:25 63:10 64:18 65:07 67:14 68:23 72:10 73:18 74:23 75:23 79:07 80:02 83:02 84:06 88:09 90:21 114:21 139:06 153:21 156:18 158:21 159:16 162:12 164:09 165:09 165:22 166:01 167:11 168:22 172:09 177:23 180:08 186:19 209:22 210:09 278:01 279:05 61:18 62:15 64:11 64:24 65:10 67:18 69:17 72:20 74:03 75:13 76:12 79:21 80:04 83:12 84:08 88:23 92:04 115:18 139:13 155:19 156:23 159:04 162:06 162:12 164:13 165:15 165:24 167:05 167:13 171:16 173:15 179:24 180:15 187:01 210:07 210:10 278:14 279:24 Defendants’ Designations: Start 32:10 46:10 47:13 End 32:11 46:19 49:03 Objection(s) No question (move to strike) Speculation (move to strike 48:4-8) 40 Counter-designation 49:11 58:04 61:19 62:16 65:11 67:19 72:21 74:14 75:14 80:06 82:06 92:05 115:19 138:23 155:20 159:05 167:15 172:01 179:25 186:06 187:11 211:04 211:16 227:03 49:24 58:08 61:24 63:05 65:16 68:22 73:07 74:22 75:21 80:09 83:01 92:23 116:06 139:05 156:10 159:15 167:18 172:08 180:03 186:18 187:24 211:12 211:19 229:09 Non-responsive (move to strike 63:2-5) Non-responsive (move to strike) Deponent: AMIR HESSEL Date of Deposition: October 4, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 14:10 15:06 34:05 35:14 38:15 92:06 101:06 105:16 116:06 117:10 120:17 121:02 End 14:21 20:17 35:06 35:20 39:16 92:15 101:18 107:04 116:17 117:20 120:25 121:07 Objection(s) 41 Counter-designation 126:05 128:02 153:04 189:20 234:22 237:05 239:17 240:24 243:19 248:19 249:17 257:10 263:16 126:21 129:13 154:04 190:17 235:08 237:20 240:11 241:15 245:04 249:05 250:02 257:24 263:25 Defendants’ Designations: Start 38:09 235:22 240:12 241:16 248:12 249:06 250:14 263:11 End 38:14 236:06 240:23 243:18 248:18 249:16 250:19 263:15 Objection(s) Counter-designation Form (243:11-18) Deponent: ALON KAUFMAN Date of Deposition: July 27, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 15:21 16:22 17:10 19:03 21:25 30:02 31:18 34:12 39:02 48:18 57:25 End 16:07 17:07 18:12 19:24 25:09 30:06 32:10 35:03 39:10 49:06 58:19 Objection(s) 42 Counter-designation 84:23 99:06 100:12 102:03 107:13 127:06 138:07 143:25 144:19 282:13 288:23 289:23 293:08 294:19 299:09 301:20 303:07 305:12 85:11 99:14 101:16 103:20 107:17 127:15 138:24 144:11 144:24 287:05 289:06 290:22 293:23 295:06 299:24 301:24 303:17 306:05 Defendants’ Designations: Start 153:25 157:21 159:12 288:06 290:23 292:02 292:13 306:06 End 155:02 159:07 160:05 288:22 291:05 292:06 293:05 306:15 Objection(s) Counter-designation Form (292:18-24) Deponent: SIMON KESSELL Date of Deposition: July 22, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 22:23 104:09 172:15 176:18 186:15 204:08 End 26:11 105:23 175:05 178:09 190:20 206:04 Objection(s) 43 Counter-designation 212:09 224:25 279:23 299:05 302:11 304:18 306:08 307:20 313:18 317:06 213:06 226:13 281:25 300:07 304:06 305:14 307:08 309:08 315:07 317:24 Defendants’ Designations: Start 18:04 29:06 29:21 31:17 33:10 49:03 49:16 87:17 102:05 124:10 125:24 127:06 159:12 160:21 233:06 257:22 301:06 309:09 310:02 310:13 311:15 313:09 319:24 320:25 321:12 325:10 327:06 End 20:21 29:16 31:04 32:17 33:20 49:09 49:25 88:02 102:18 125:23 126:07 127:12 159:14 162:03 233:19 258:19 301:10 309:17 310:04 310:16 312:03 313:17 320:15 321:06 322:02 325:22 327:10 Objection(s) Counter-designation Hearsay Hearsay Form; Hearsay Foundation Form Form Form; incomplete -- move to add if objection overruled 310:5-7 Best Evidence; Form Deponent: 44 159:16-160:3 WILLIAM KEUNEN Date of Deposition: December 20, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 10:21 11:25 13:12 19:05 20:05 24:13 56:23 59:10 68:03 117:02 118:08 230:25 231:14 234:17 246:07 247:13 248:11 262:12 End 11:02 13:09 17:03 19:23 20:20 26:10 57:07 61:25 69:10 117:24 121:12 231:09 231:19 234:23 247:12 248:05 249:03 263:03 Objection(s) Counter-designation Calls for speculation (402, 403) Defendants’ Designations: Start 67:24 84:09 85:20 88:17 93:17 95:08 96:02 109:08 117:25 121:13 122:07 123:15 136:16 137:06 137:13 137:19 139:22 End 68:02 85:18 85:23 88:24 94:11 95:11 96:14 110:06 118:07 121:18 122:17 123:18 136:22 137:09 137:16 138:21 140:04 Objection(s) Foundation Non-responsive (move to strike) Stricken by counsel (96:2-14) 45 Counter-designation 140:06 140:19 143:03 140:15 141:12 143:16 248:06 248:10 259:22 260:17 260:22 261:02 Non-responsive (move to strike 140:6-7) 260:10 260:20 260:23 261:05 Non-responsive (move to strike 143:1216) Non-responsive (move to strike beginning with 248:8 “and nor did they” through 248:10) Deponent: WILLIAM KEUNEN Date of Deposition: December 21, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 440:04 440:25 End 440:12 441:13 441:21 442:06 Objection(s) Counter-designation Misleading, confusion of the issues (402, 403) Misleading, confusion of the issues (402, 403) Defendants’ Designations: Start None End Objection(s) Counter-designation Deponent: WILLIAM KEUNEN Date of Deposition: April 18, 2013 Defendants’ Designations: Start 722:11 725:06 725:14 727:22 733:22 734:03 735:09 End 724:15 725:10 725:15 728:11 733:24 734:04 736:10 Objection(s) Form 46 Counter-designation Deponent: DANIEL LIPTON Date of Deposition: May 14, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 20:18 22:02 25:16 27:11 91:23 129:17 144:14 176:17 190:02 219:03 235:18 237:9 End 21:18 22:14 27:10 28:23 93:05 135:16 148:22 176:23 191:05 219:23 236:04 238:25 Objection(s) Counter-designation Defendants’ Designations: Start 19:03 21:19 34:08 End 19:21 21:20 34:14 Objection(s) Counter-designation Form 34:15-35:17, 35:1936:2, 36:4-16 40:14 47:08 48:05 48:14 52:19 56:15 57:19 59:03 61:02 65:13 65:21 66:06 44:10 47:23 48:09 49:04 53:09 57:14 58:05 59:07 63:08 65:19 66:02 66:07 Form Form Form; Speculation Form 66:22 67:21 66:25 68:04 Form 58:6-13 Form; Compound; Leading Form Form Form (in conjunction with predicate question above) Form 47 71:04 71:14 71:11 72:02 72:05 72:08 72:10 72:12 73:02 74:18 74:24 75:23 76:13 77:15 81:20 84:12 87:05 87:17 88:07 88:10 89:05 90:17 74:04 74:22 75:09 76:08 77:13 77:20 84:03 87:03 87:05 88:05 88:07 88:17 90:08 91:19 93:06 93:22 96:04 97:02 99:14 99:25 101:10 101:23 102:10 102:22 107:14 108:24 110:03 110:13 113:25 114:08 114:23 115:22 116:25 118:12 121:12 93:12 95:21 96:09 97:04 99:23 101:06 101:14 101:23 102:20 103:22 107:23 109:25 110:07 113:23 113:25 114:17 115:19 116:23 118:10 121:05 122:22 Form Form; Leading; Assumes Facts Not in Evidence Form; Leading; Foundation; Assumes Facts Not in Evidence Form; Speculation; Foundation; Assumes Facts Not in Evidence; Lack of Personal Knowledge (in conjunction with predicate question) Best Evidence; Form Form; Compound; Foundation Form; Compound; Argumentative Form Form Best evidence; Form Form Form; Compound Form Speculation; Best Evidence Speculation; Best Evidence; Compound; Form Compound; Form Form Form Form; Lack of Foundation Form; Lack of Foundation Form Form Form Form Form Form Form Form 48 122:24 126:07 126:13 128:23 141:14 142:12 142:19 143:17 144:07 148:23 152:14 125:06 126:10 126:13 129:05 142:10 142:14 143:12 143:19 144:13 152:12 161:15 161:18 162:18 162:23 164:03 164:07 164:17 165:02 168:06 171:19 172:08 172:14 172:24 175:04 175:16 186:20 162:05 162:21 162:23 164:05 164:15 164:20 165:13 168:09 172:04 172:11 172:15 173:14 175:13 176:02 189:17 191:06 191:13 191:15 191:23 192:08 194:11 194:17 200:23 203:11 204:18 204:24 206:03 206:12 206:23 207:15 208:22 209:16 191:15 192:04 192:23 194:12 200:15 203:09 204:13 204:22 204:24 206:10 206:21 207:10 207:19 208:25 209:19 Form Form Form Form Form Form; Assumes Facts Not in Evidence Form Form Form; Foundation; Assumes Facts Not in Evidence Foundation Form Form Best Evidence; Form Best Evidence; Form Best Evidence; Form Form Foundation; Assumes Facts Not in Evidence Relevance (188:19-21, stricken by counsel); Foundation FRE 602 FRE 602 Form; Best Evidence; Foundation Form Form Form Form Form; Compound Form Form Assumes Facts Not in Evidence; Form Form 49 209:24 212:07 213:25 214:07 214:17 215:15 218:15 219:24 220:10 221:21 222:06 225:22 227:02 210:15 213:19 214:05 214:15 215:13 216:05 219:02 220:08 221:11 221:25 225:20 226:23 229:17 229:20 230:15 231:25 234:18 235:15 236:05 239:02 240:14 240:19 242:17 243:19 244:04 248:25 249:09 250:17 250:20 250:22 251:24 255:16 256:04 256:18 257:09 257:16 258:18 265:23 267:20 267:24 268:02 268:05 269:03 270:15 230:12 231:23 234:14 235:03 235:17 236:21 239:08 240:15 240:22 243:12 244:02 248:22 249:07 250:14 250:17 250:20 251:21 253:25 256:02 256:15 257:05 257:13 257:17 259:08 266:03 267:22 267:24 268:02 268:09 270:03 270:21 Form Best Evidence; Compound; Form Form; Compound Form Form Lack of Personal Knowledge; FRE 602 Form Form Form; Best Evidence Form Form; Compound; Best Evidence; Assumes Facts Not in Evidence Form Form, foundation Form Form Form Form Form Form Form Form Form Form; Foundation Form Form Form; Foundation Form Form Form Form 50 270:23 273:25 276:20 277:18 278:15 279:05 280:04 280:17 281:02 281:24 282:07 282:11 284:12 286:05 286:22 288:23 291:03 292:05 293:16 298:08 300:22 302:07 302:18 303:13 305:04 306:09 271:07 276:16 277:16 277:21 278:25 279:12 280:14 280:21 281:19 282:04 282:09 284:10 286:02 286:19 288:06 290:23 292:02 293:14 293:16 300:20 302:03 302:12 303:09 304:18 305:08 308:03 Compound; Form Form Compound; Form Compound; Form Form Compound Form; Compound Deponent: DANIEL LIPTON Date of Deposition: May 15, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 425:10 436:20 481:09 485:02 490:16 491:09 End 426:17 437:16 484:25 485:15 490:22 493:06 495:02 497:22 Objection(s) Misleading, confusion of the issues. (402, 403) Improper characterization of prior testimony, prejudicial, confusion of the issues. (402, 403) 51 Counter-designation 498:05 499:17 500:21 502:02 508:04 501:18 502:22 508:14 510:14 511:16 540:14 541:10 545:09 639:13 641:20 642:17 546:05 640:13 642:03 643:06 677:09 Calls for speculation, misleading. (402, 403) 677:20 Calls for speculation, lack of foundation. (402, 403) Calls for speculation, lack of foundation. (402, 403) Improper characterization of prior testimony, confusion of the issues. (402, 403) Calls for speculation, lack of foundation, improper characterization of the facts (402, 403, 602) Defendants’ Designations: Start 426:18 438:07 438:15 501:20 501:24 508:15 508:20 510:11 End 427:20 438:13 439:09 501:22 501:25 508:18 509:05 510:13 Objection(s) 514:08 514:15 515:09 527:09 527:15 514:11 515:07 515:14 527:13 527:18 Form Form Form Form Form; Assumes Facts Not in Evidence; Foundation 527:20 528:03 528:10 534:17 535:03 535:11 579:02 579:09 527:20 528:08 528:10 534:25 535:03 535:22 579:07 579:14 Counter-designation Foundation Form Incomplete Form Form; Assumes Facts Not in Evidence 52 509:25-510:5, 510:710 579:16 580:11 580:09 581:22 Deponent: BERT LOKHORST Date of Deposition: August 16, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 6:03 6:18 8:22 9:19 9:25 11:06 12:17 14:12 15:17 16:19 17:18 17:21 25:02 26:02 27:18 28:15 38:18 40:03 40:16 41:06 42:04 49:02 59:17 61:18 62:12 62:23 63:05 64:02 64:05 82:17 83:11 84:01 84:10 87:08 End 6:06 7:07 9:02 9:23 10:01 11:14 13:04 15:02 15:20 17:06 17:19 18:06 25:07 26:10 28:09 29:01 39:04 40:14 40:20 41:17 42:09 50:18 59:21 62:10 62:17 63:03 64:01 64:03 64:05 83:10 83:23 84:03 84:17 87:10 Objection(s) 53 Counter-designation 88:20 96:01 97:01 98:03 98:06 98:08 104:12 105:14 111:13 127:19 130:09 153:15 153:22 154:03 170:25 171:14 171:18 172:08 172:11 172:15 172:19 174:15 174:24 175:18 178:13 179:01 179:14 179:24 181:17 182:05 182:08 183:01 183:20 184:20 184:22 185:02 185:09 185:12 186:03 187:21 188:04 188:17 188:23 189:01 189:06 89:06 96:23 98:01 98:04 98:06 98:12 105:07 106:16 112:01 128:09 130:20 153:19 154:01 154:06 171:12 171:16 172:06 172:09 172:13 172:17 174:13 174:21 175:07 178:11 178:24 179:12 179:22 180:08 182:03 182:06 182:24 183:16 184:18 184:20 184:24 185:07 185:10 186:01 187:19 188:02 188:06 188:20 188:24 189:03 189:06 54 189:08 189:17 190:06 190:08 190:25 191:14 191:23 192:21 193:25 194:16 195:02 196:07 196:22 197:10 199:03 199:24 200:11 200:23 201:01 201:05 201:13 202:07 203:12 203:16 203:23 204:03 205:05 205:11 206:05 207:06 207:22 209:10 209:25 210:11 211:03 211:11 212:08 212:17 213:03 213:10 213:20 239:23 241:07 241:14 242:07 189:14 190:02 190:06 190:23 191:12 191:20 192:08 193:20 194:14 194:24 196:04 196:10 197:01 198:25 199:13 200:05 200:21 200:24 201:03 201:11 202:05 203:07 203:13 203:20 203:24 205:03 205:09 206:02 207:04 207:20 209:07 209:17 210:09 210:25 211:04 212:05 212:15 212:25 213:08 213:18 213:21 241:05 241:12 242:05 242:12 55 242:15 268:23 269:11 270:17 271:22 243:05 269:08 269:14 271:03 272:06 Defendants’ Designations: Start 112:02 112:25 113:05 248:04 251:23 253:24 End 112:23 113:02 113:18 248:06 253:07 255:03 Objection(s) Counter-designation Incomplete 248:7-18, 248:20-21 Deponent: LARRY LUCKMANN Date of Deposition: February 14, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 10:15 12:18 14:21 15:15 18:08 27:22 28:05 59:16 End 10:20 13:14 15:13 17:10 19:12 27:25 28:08 59:25 94:23 105:04 95:24 105:16 Objection(s) Relevance (402, 403) Calls for speculation (602); Form (402,403); Hearsay (801, 802); Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602) Hearsay 801, 802; Relevance (402, 403) Argumentative (402, 403); Assumes facts not in evidence (602); Calls for speculation (602); Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 56 Counter-designation 109:08 110:03 130:02 103:24 131:20 132:15 133:04 133:10 176:04 176:08 178:09 178:17 180:09 181:03 183:08 183:24 403); Argumentative (402, 403); Assumes facts not evidence (602); Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Hearsay (801, 802); Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Leading (611); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403); Calls for speculation (602); Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602) More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for speculation (602); Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Form (402, 403); Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for speculation (602); Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Form (402, 403); Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Hearsay 801, 802; Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Form (402, 403); Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Relevance (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Confusion of 57 the issues (402, 403); Hearsay 801, 802; Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602) Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 183:25 186:16 184:08 187:02 188:04 188:13 191:05 191:13 199:16 200:10 201:12 201:16 201:21 201:25 202:13 203:05 Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Form (402, 403); Hearsay 801, 802; Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602) Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Form (402, 403); Hearsay 801, 802; Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Relevance (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Hearsay 801, 802; Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Hearsay (801, 802); Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Hearsay 801, 802; Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for speculation (602); Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Hearsay 801, 802; 58 203:16 203:21 205:16 206:08 206:12 206:15 207:21 208:20 220:22 222:18 221:08 223:10 224:05 224:19 Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for speculation (602); Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Hearsay 801, 802; Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for speculation (602); Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Hearsay 801, 802; Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for speculation (602); Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Hearsay 801, 802; Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for speculation (602); Confusion of the issues (402, 403); Hearsay 801, 802; Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Hearsay 801, 802; Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Hearsay (801, 802); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Defendants’ Designations: Start End Objection(s) 59 Counter-designation Deponent: JESS LUZADAS Date of Deposition: May 31, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 37:03 51:03 51:21 102:14 136:10 145:02 End 37:15 51:06 55:03 103:18 137:07 145:16 Objection(s) Counter-designation Objection(s) Counter-designation Defendants’ Designations: Start 22:10 23:03 33:08 49:09 266:18 End 22:20 23:20 33:14 51:02 267:02 Deponent: VIONA MA Date of Deposition: April 24, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 7:21 12:08 13:14 16:03 18:13 19:12 23:23 28:13 30:02 30:21 32:03 End 7:24 12:22 14:05 16:23 19:03 20:20 24:07 29:25 30:10 31:20 32:05 Objection(s) 60 Counter-designation 35:14 35:25 49:18 50:18 51:24 53:09 54:16 55:19 57:12 58:08 60:02 60:08 60:22 61:07 63:04 73:10 74:09 75:16 93:15 126:06 128:22 129:07 132:22 147:24 149:04 160:03 35:20 36:08 50:05 51:22 52:10 53:15 55:02 56:16 57:22 59:09 60:05 60:13 61:02 61:09 63:25 74:02 74:11 76:23 93:20 126:21 129:05 129:11 133:25 148:03 149:16 161:10 161:12 161:16 163:13 164:02 165:09 167:04 168:04 168:16 169:24 170:04 193:08 194:09 196:18 197:16 201:20 208:19 163:25 164:15 166:08 168:02 168:14 169:15 170:02 170:20 193:17 196:07 197:13 197:18 201:24 209:14 161:1-10 Foundation; Speculation; Prejudicial; Mischaracterizes the Evidence 161:12-162:10 Foundation; Speculation; Prejudicial; Mischaracterizes the Evidence 61 209:16 211:03 214:21 215:19 218:03 224:13 224:19 225:04 225:11 226:22 227:02 227:08 227:12 227:22 229:03 229:07 229:12 229:17 229:22 233:14 236:18 236:24 237:07 238:10 238:15 238:21 238:25 239:09 209:22 211:09 215:03 216:24 218:14 224:16 224:25 225:08 225:11 226:24 227:02 227:10 227:20 227:22 229:05 229:10 229:15 229:19 229:22 233:21 236:22 237:02 237:09 238:12 238:18 238:23 238:25 239:12 239:15 269:15 269:23 284:02 304:12 304:24 305:05 305:11 239:16 269:21 269:23 284:16 304:21 305:03 305:08 305:11 Foundation; Speculation; Prejudicial; Vague Defendants’ Designations: Start 36:24 38:06 39:07 39:10 End 37:25 39:04 39:08 39:11 Objection(s) Foundation Form (38:20-39:4) 62 Counter-designation 39:13 40:05 41:16 42:08 43:09 46:23 56:17 60:15 61:10 64:04 68:04 74:03 76:24 79:05 80:11 80:25 82:11 84:18 85:07 86:07 86:22 87:05 88:02 91:18 92:12 92:16 93:21 95:12 96:03 96:13 98:15 99:05 102:08 161:17 233:22 39:18 41:14 41:17 43:07 46:18 47:07 56:23 60:17 61:12 65:14 70:09 74:08 77:23 80:04 80:21 81:12 82:24 85:04 86:05 86:18 86:22 87:07 91:05 91:24 92:14 92:16 94:09 95:19 96:10 97:21 98:25 99:15 103:04 162:10 234:05 234:09 284:20 293:04 294:10 294:14 295:16 295:23 296:14 297:11 234:13 286:09 293:23 294:12 295:12 295:21 296:03 296:23 297:15 Leading Form (86:3-5) Leading (86:16-18) Form Form Form Incomplete Incomplete; Lack of Personal Knowledge Form Form 63 161:13-16 233:8 298:17 300:25 301:19 302:05 302:12 303:13 303:16 303:25 299:12 301:04 302:03 302:05 302:15 303:14 303:22 304:04 Form (301:24-305:3) Form Deponent: ANTHONY MALLIS Date of Deposition: September 22, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 8:10 10:03 21:25 23:18 26:23 28:16 44:10 91:04 95:21 148:10 148:24 153:21 159:13 271:05 278:15 End 8:13 10:12 22:08 23:25 27:23 29:08 45:16 91:11 96:09 148:15 149:09 154:07 160:05 271:21 279:13 Objection(s) Counter-designation Hearsay (801) Defendants’ Designations: Start 11:6 18:6 29:16 33:5 48:11 96:10 104:25 109:21 132:22 End 11:13 18:16 29:19 33:7 48:21 96:18 105:10 110:21 133:6 Objection(s) Incomplete Incomplete Incomplete Form; Foundation; FRE 702 Incomplete Counter-designation 10:17-11:5 18:17-19:3 29:20-30:17 Incomplete 105:11-14 Incomplete 132:13-133:6 64 49:3-13 137:6 143:16 146:7 148:2 149:10 155:19 138:25 143:25 146:12 148:9 149:17 155:22 Incomplete 139:1-5 Incomplete Incomplete 149:18-150:7 155:12-18, 155:23156:23 157:5 157:25 Mischaracterizes prior testimony; assumes facts not in evidence 158:15 169:2 161:4 180:25 158:20 169:13 162:10 181:13 272:11 272:22 274:5 275:10 281:15 272:19 273:3 274:16 276:12 282:2 283:19 289:17 290:25 292:5 293:14 284:16 290:7 291:17 292:22 294:5 Foundation; Vague/Ambiguous; Duplicative Incomplete 273:4-8 Foundation; FRE 602; Speculation; Incomplete – if objections overruled, add 281:3-14, 282:3-11 Incomplete Foundation; Vague/Ambiguous 290:8 Duplicative Deponent: ALI MARSHAD Date of Deposition: September 23, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 6:23 16:21 27:20 29:10 33:23 41:09 42:23 48:23 54:05 58:22 59:25 End 6:25 20:12 28:13 29:23 34:05 41:13 43:02 49:22 54:25 59:15 60:10 Objection(s) Lack of foundation (602); Hearsay (801) Lack of foundation (602); Hearsay (801) 65 Counter-designation 60:22 66:16 67:13 82:06 112:12 235:13 236:13 239:20 61:09 67:02 67:18 82:18 113:02 236:09 237:10 240:07 Defendants’ Designations: Start 11:20 16:17 48:13 50:13 57:3 58:9 59:20 60:22 63:12 64:3 64:25 67:8 69:14 End 16:2 16:20 48:22 51:13 57:7 58:21 59:24 62:24 63:15 64:17 65:9 67:18 70:23 71:5 73:8 75:6 82:6 91:23 93:17 125:13 126:14 126:18 127:8 127:18 128:3 129:19 235:19 239:15 240:8 240:25 241:15 243:8 71:12 73:16 76:24 82:18 92:14 94:2 125:19 126:16 127:5 127:13 127:24 128:3 132:3 237:10 239:19 240:23 241:12 243:5 243:12 Objection(s) Relevance (particularly 15:12-16:2) Foundation; FRE 602; Speculation [clean up 57:6] Incomplete FRE 602; Speculation FRE 602; Speculation FRE 602; Speculation FRE 602; Speculation; Hearsay; Nonresponsive; Relevance; 403; FRE 407 Relevance; 403; FRE 407 Foundation; Hearsay; FRE 602 Hearsay; FRE 602; 403 FRE 602; Speculation; Foundation FRE 602; Speculation; Foundation FRE 602 FRE 602 FRE 602 FRE 602 FRE 602 FRE 602 FRE 602 FRE 602; Hearsay; Relevance FRE 602 (236:10-12) FRE 602; Foundation; Duplicative 66 Counter-designation 57:8-11 246:7 247:22 248:21 246:21 248:7 251:11 FRE 602; Foundation FRE 602; Foundation FRE 602; Foundation; Incomplete – if objections overruled, add 251:11-15 Deponent: LINDA MCGOWAN Date of Deposition: July 10, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 21:03 25:04 30:18 50:02 52:07 57:02 66:06 77:16 78:04 End 21:07 25:08 30:25 51:17 52:20 57:11 66:10 77:25 78:24 83:20 84:16 85:11 87:01 90:14 91:06 93:21 97:11 83:24 85:06 85:14 87:25 90:24 91:13 94:04 97:17 Objection(s) Counter-designation Calls for speculation (602) Argumentative (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Lack of foundation (602) Argumentative (402, 403) Hearsay (801, 802) Lack of foundation (602) Defendants’ Designations: Start 18:01 19:04 20:03 21:08 21:22 23:22 24:05 24:21 27:16 28:17 End 18:08 19:25 20:19 21:14 22:11 23:24 24:11 25:03 27:25 29:04 Objection(s) Counter-designation Incomplete Form 20:21-22 Incomplete 23:9-12, 23:15-21 67 29:06 33:08 34:08 35:18 37:03 37:18 38:15 38:18 39:09 45:06 45:10 46:01 46:09 46:25 48:22 49:23 52:21 53:10 53:19 54:13 60:06 61:02 61:18 66:11 69:15 69:24 71:10 72:04 72:17 72:21 74:07 75:04 29:07 34:05 34:08 35:25 37:08 37:25 38:16 38:21 40:07 45:08 45:13 46:07 46:12 47:18 48:25 50:01 52:25 53:14 54:04 55:11 60:12 61:06 61:22 66:15 69:18 71:01 71:18 72:07 72:19 73:07 74:14 75:10 75:13 76:11 76:17 77:07 78:04 80:08 81:18 84:08 98:07 75:24 76:15 76:21 77:15 78:04 80:13 82:05 84:15 99:17 Hearsay Lack of Knowledge; Speculation Lack of Knowledge; Speculation Incomplete 53:2-9 Non-responsive (move to strike 70:3-10) Incomplete Incomplete 71:2-6 71:19-23 Incomplete Deponent: 68 74:15-16, 74:19-24, 75:3 MARK MCKEEFRY Date of Deposition: June 19, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 22:16 23:12 24:19 26:03 29:02 30:22 54:03 103:11 107:05 107:17 110:05 112:14 113:20 114:06 115:02 116:03 121:20 156:11 175:02 222:14 227:19 237:19 238:10 249:09 273:05 275:17 276:05 280:06 287:02 287:19 288:20 290:25 293:24 296:14 307:16 312:16 318:16 326:13 328:22 End 23:05 23:24 24:24 26:23 30:12 31:20 64:22 106:03 107:11 109:12 111:13 113:14 113:25 114:17 115:11 117:03 122:10 158:02 175:13 222:21 228:14 238:05 238:23 249:19 274:24 275:25 276:11 284:09 287:12 287:22 288:23 292:16 296:05 297:09 309:12 316:19 322:11 328:02 331:15 Objection(s) 69 Counter-designation 332:09 335:08 332:17 336:13 341:07 343:20 360:11 378:12 381:07 385:06 387:08 388:19 390:21 342:15 360:04 360:25 379:14 384:08 386:21 388:02 390:05 400:02 Foundation; Speculation; Prejudicial; Mischaracterizes the Evidence Defendants’ Designations: Start 23:25 65:20 66:06 66:11 68:06 76:23 77:22 79:18 84:23 85:15 86:09 93:03 95:13 97:14 98:10 124:02 124:18 127:06 127:21 128:04 132:21 133:19 End 24:12 66:03 66:09 67:17 68:08 77:16 78:03 81:21 85:13 85:19 86:24 94:17 95:22 98:04 99:08 124:07 126:08 127:17 128:02 128:21 133:16 134:08 134:10 134:13 158:04 173:15 176:02 176:12 134:11 134:14 158:25 173:20 176:05 176:18 Objection(s) Foundation; Speculation Form; Compound Compound Foundation; Lack of Personal Knowledge Leading Vague/Ambiguous 70 Counter-designation 184:09 192:09 193:13 195:18 196:18 197:02 198:09 202:09 202:20 204:25 211:13 212:06 213:14 219:11 220:04 222:22 223:25 224:05 224:13 224:21 224:23 225:09 229:09 231:23 232:03 232:10 238:06 239:08 243:08 186:08 192:25 193:22 196:09 196:23 197:13 198:20 202:11 202:21 205:11 211:20 213:10 213:18 219:23 221:04 223:23 224:03 224:09 224:19 224:21 225:06 225:09 231:16 231:25 232:08 232:18 238:09 239:13 243:20 245:09 248:10 250:18 251:20 253:11 254:09 245:23 249:06 251:17 252:16 253:12 254:21 254:25 255:04 255:08 255:14 255:22 256:16 258:16 259:05 255:12 255:19 255:25 257:04 258:21 259:11 Form; Vague/Ambiguous Foundation; Form Question Stricken by Counsel (213:2-3) Form; Compound Form; Timeframe; Vague/Ambiguous Form Vague/Ambiguous; Form Form Leading Hearsay; Foundation Form Form Form Form Question Stricken by Counsel (243:1214) Compound; Form Compound; Form Foundation; Compound; Form Foundation; Compound; Form Vague/Ambiguous; Form Form; Speculation; Lack of Personal Knowledge Form; Speculation; Lack of Personal Knowledge Form; Speculation Foundation; Argumentative; Form Foundation; Form 71 259:17 260:04 259:22 260:16 260:23 274:25 261:14 275:16 276:02 276:12 277:23 278:03 367:02 368:22 369:02 369:10 369:23 370:14 370:22 371:07 371:25 276:04 277:21 277:25 278:03 368:20 368:24 369:08 369:18 370:06 370:19 370:25 371:15 372:13 Vague/Ambiguous Vague/Ambiguous; Misstates Prior Testimony; Form Form; Vague/Ambiguous Question Stricken by Counsel (274:25275:2); Speculation; Form Foundation Form; Compound Form Form Form Form; Speculation Form Form Form Compound Deponent: GORDON MCKENZIE Date of Deposition: May 8, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 12:25 16:18 81:22 195:16 240:23 258:18 277:05 277:21 279:10 288:24 294:10 298:11 309:10 315:24 320:23 328:02 329:24 End 14:22 17:05 85:10 195:20 242:02 260:19 277:14 278:11 288:16 289:07 298:05 309:06 311:05 316:09 326:09 329:07 334:10 Objection(s) 72 Counter-designation 334:16 338:12 340:05 342:04 345:14 346:11 348:13 349:19 351:14 338:04 339:21 341:23 342:25 346:02 347:09 349:10 350:17 352:08 Defendants’ Designations: Start 11:13 14:23 77:20 89:14 130:03 End 12:07 14:25 79:04 90:16 131:18 134:18 137:10 138:14 141:12 142:20 143:10 144:07 144:24 150:18 138:23 142:06 142:25 143:13 144:15 145:04 151:19 152:08 154:04 156:11 157:15 158:02 160:14 161:05 161:12 162:25 164:17 165:07 168:05 172:14 174:21 175:20 179:12 153:21 156:06 156:17 157:22 159:02 160:21 161:08 162:21 164:03 164:20 165:20 172:03 174:15 175:15 179:02 180:02 Objection(s) Form Form; Move to Strike Counsel’s Colloquy (130:8-9) Form; Compound; Vague/Ambiguous; Hearsay Form Form (141:25-142:6) Form Compound; Speculation; Lack of Personal Knowledge Form; Vague/Ambiguous Form Form Form, Best Evidence Vague/Ambiguous; Compound Form Compound; Form Form Best Evidence Best Evidence; Form Best Evidence; Form Form 73 Counter-designation 181:13 183:20 189:12 190:18 191:12 194:21 195:21 201:17 209:17 211:15 212:21 215:06 242:03 243:15 258:07 260:20 277:15 311:06 315:10 316:10 350:18 354:25 183:03 183:24 189:20 191:10 191:19 195:15 198:02 202:05 210:05 212:18 213:23 215:20 242:05 244:21 258:09 261:08 277:20 312:04 315:23 316:21 351:13 357:18 Form; Vague/Ambiguous Form; Vague/Ambiguous Speculation; Form Form Compound; Form Form Compound Form; Compound Form; Vague/Ambiguous Incomplete Form Form Form Form 260:19 Form; Vague/Ambiguous Deponent: FOLGERT MEIJER Date of Deposition: December 6, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 14:10 End 15:25 23:24 30:24 31:07 31:24 37:23 31:09 32:19 38:24 46:14 48:08 54:15 63:17 More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602) 56:04 57:23 Objection(s) Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403); Calls for 74 Counter-designation expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602) 65:03 68:16 70:03 66:09 69:19 70:16 71:18 72:11 74:12 76:09 Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403); Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602) 75:05 77:07 78:20 79:03 79:21 83:23 Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 82:16 84:07 85:18 86:11 93:08 96:12 Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403); Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602) 93:19 98:08 99:08 109:24 99:12 111:25 112:06 113:02 113:14 Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403); Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602) Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403); Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602) 113:22 119:13 120:07 127:14 129:25 Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403); Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602) Lack of personal knowledge (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial 75 than probative (402, 403) 130:02 139:02 141:20 132:07 141:03 143:09 144:03 144:16 162:19 166:11 173:05 176:18 179:16 Hearsay (801, 802); Lack of personal knowledge (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Lack of foundation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 180:04 181:02 182:07 192:10 194:25 195:02 Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403); Calls for expert testimony (701-703) 195:13 198:24 201:03 200:04 202:25 Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Argumentative (402, 403); Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 76 205:14 205:22 207:21 Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 208:23 Defendants’ Designations: Start 38:25 66:20 77:24 89:02 99:02 99:13 100:07 102:14 103:09 104:04 106:03 113:23 115:09 134:08 135:10 138:22 182:08 End 39:24 66:25 78:07 89:12 99:07 99:23 100:22 103:03 103:24 104:08 107:12 114:21 116:04 135:06 136:08 138:24 184:04 186:08 188:20 190:09 200:13 186:17 189:18 190:16 200:25 Objection(s) Counter-designation Best Evidence Best Evidence Hearsay Hearsay Form Form Form 116:5-25 Question Stricken by Counsel (183:24184:4) Best Evidence Deponent: FOLGERT MEIJER Date of Deposition: May 9, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 235:24 244:01 249:23 251:20 End 242:09 244:18 251:08 Objection(s) 252:05 77 Counter-designation 254:14 253:13 266:02 266:18 284:23 283:22 291:01 289:14 294:08 296:06 295:18 299:21 304:14 303:06 304:19 Calls for expert testimony (701-703); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Form (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703) Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Lack of foundation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 306:24 308:19 307:10 Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Lack of foundation (602) 309:10 309:03 Lack of personal knowledge (602) 349:02 Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Lack of foundation (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 437:11 Lack of foundation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 440:22 Lack of foundation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 447:20 Lack of foundation (602); Lack of 346:12 436:13 439:13 447:13 78 personal knowledge (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 448:09 448:23 Defendants’ Designations: Start 233:11 247:20 251:09 253:05 255:17 256:01 256:20 256:25 257:04 259:23 260:21 274:22 275:11 277:23 291:10 292:20 300:15 301:24 310:16 311:10 312:09 312:24 End 234:04 248:17 251:19 253:12 255:19 256:18 256:23 257:02 257:21 260:06 261:15 275:08 275:11 278:05 291:12 292:23 301:09 302:14 311:04 311:13 312:13 314:10 315:14 316:07 329:20 330:19 334:05 339:07 358:10 359:19 437:12 329:24 331:02 334:08 339:11 358:16 360:05 439:12 441:05 441:15 441:17 441:23 Objection(s) Counter-designation Form Incomplete 261:16-262:2 Incomplete Incomplete 278:6-21 291:2-9, 291:13-17 Hearsay Lack of Personal Knowledge; Speculation; Non-Responsive Non-Responsive (move to strike 316:2 beginning with “but with the objective …” through 316:7) Incomplete No Question Pending; Incomplete Relevance Lack of Personal Knowledge; Best Evidence Speculation; Lack of Personal Knowledge Hearsay 79 329:25-330:2 444:05 444:18 446:05 446:21 447:21 449:17 450:03 451:01 451:10 444:12 445:25 446:09 447:02 448:08 449:22 450:24 451:04 452:09 452:17 453:10 453:21 452:21 453:18 454:01 455:11 Leading Relevance (445:15-21); Form 455:13 Lack of Personal Knowledge Foundation Relevance; Lack of Personal Knowledge; Speculation Form; Assumes Facts Not in Evidence Lack of Personal Knowledge; Speculation Deponent: CHRIS MEIJNDERS Date of Deposition: November 26, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 15:07 16:23 17:15 21:08 21:24 25:07 25:17 26:21 28:08 30:10 31:25 End 16:12 17:10 19:10 21:16 22:23 25:11 26:05 27:14 28:15 31:12 37:10 37:22 39:02 40:19 41:12 42:05 42:17 43:02 43:14 43:21 44:13 Objection(s) Improper characterization of the facts, confusion of the issues (402, 403) Improper characterization of the facts, confusion of the issues (402, 403) Improper characterization of the facts, confusion of the issues, form (402, 403) Improper characterization of the facts, confusion of the issues (402, 403) Calls for speculation, improper characterization of the facts (402, 403) 80 Counter-designation 45:06 45:21 49:19 50:25 56:02 57:13 59:16 62:11 64:04 66:18 75:15 50:20 51:15 56:25 58:25 62:07 63:21 65:10 67:17 76:03 77:13 80:08 80:13 82:19 85:25 81:02 82:22 86:10 86:14 90:18 91:15 100:23 105:21 116:10 117:16 137:07 137:12 141:07 145:22 148:25 Improper characterization of the facts, confusion of the issues (402, 403) 146:11 151:02 151:08 157:24 161:04 162:21 163:09 171:06 175:19 175:25 184:17 195:15 198:02 Improper characterization of the facts (402, 403) Improper characterization of the facts, confusion of the issues (402, 403) Confusion of the issues, improper characterization of the facts (402, 403) Improper characterization of the facts, calls for speculation, lack of foundation (402, 403, 602) Improper characterization of the facts, calls for speculation, form, confusion of the issues (402, 403, 602); Prejudicial. (402, 403) Improper characterization of the facts, calls for speculation, form, confusion of the issues (402, 403, 602) Lack of foundation, calls for speculation, improper characterization of the facts, confusion of the issues (402, 403, 602) Improper characterization of the evidence, form, confusion of the issues (402, 403) 165:09 171:25 173:13 Calls for speculation (402, 403, 602) Calls for speculation (402, 403, 602) Calls for speculation (402, 403, 602) Calls for speculation (402, 403, 602) Lack of foundation, calls for speculation (402, 403, 602) Improper characterization of the facts. Form. Confuses the issues. Prejudicial. Lack of foundation, calls for speculation 81 198:06 207:12 216:25 218:09 219:16 226:03 227:17 239:24 242:23 253:03 228:14 242:16 244:04 253:19 254:25 260:08 260:17 263:18 (402, 403, 602) Lack of foundation, calls for speculation (402, 403, 602) Calls for speculation, improper characterization of the evidence, confusion of the issues (402, 403); Prejudicial (402, 403) Argumentative, improper characterization of the facts, calls for speculation, lack of foundation, confusion of the issues (402, 403); Prejudicial (402, 403) Improper characterization of the evidence, confusion of the issues (402, 403) Lack of foundation, hearsay (402, 403, 602) Defendants’ Designations: Start 12:02 20:12 29:09 54:10 55:17 160:20 210:10 212:24 214:25 216:15 219:09 234:19 End 12:05 20:14 29:16 54:24 55:21 161:03 211:23 213:09 215:17 215:24 219:15 235:03 235:09 237:03 246:05 235:24 237:25 246:16 249:09 250:03 Objection(s) Incomplete Incomplete Counter-designations 11:24-25 20:4-11 Incomplete Incomplete 54:25-55:16 160:5-19 Incomplete Incomplete Wrong designation (216:24); Incomplete Incomplete Speculation; Non-responsive – Move to strike (everything after “I don’t recall specifically”) 212:5-23 214:17-24 216:10-14 218:22-219:6 Incomplete Non-responsive – Move to strike; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 246:2-4, 246:17-247:9 Incomplete 236:22-237:2; 238:2-9 82 249:7-8, 250:4-12 252:02 252:08 Incomplete 252:9-19 Deponent: WALTER NOEL Date of Deposition: June 12, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 009:12 017:08 019:21 023:11 061:11 118:10 128:22 137:14 139:08 140:16 141:21 153:15 155:04 156:19 157:02 169:18 171:23 174:15 End 09:25 18:07 20:04 24:14 61:23 119:18 129:24 138:24 139:24 141:11 142:24 154:06 156:03 156:25 160:18 170:02 173:20 176:09 Objection(s) Counter-designation Objection(s) Counter-designation Defendants’ Designations: Start 51:08 53:04 57:20 58:02 80:11 81:15 82:07 82:11 83:13 84:06 85:15 86:13 End 52:12 54:18 57:24 58:05 81:06 81:25 82:07 82:16 83:18 84:16 86:10 86:17 Form; Lack of Personal Knowledge Best Evidence Form Form 83 86:24 90:11 90:23 93:03 95:24 98:11 98:17 99:06 99:11 100:02 100:14 101:17 103:15 108:23 110:12 111:22 112:04 113:01 113:16 113:21 129:25 132:07 132:17 132:23 133:15 133:21 135:20 136:03 141:12 141:18 156:04 156:10 156:18 164:18 164:22 87:07 90:15 91:02 93:07 97:04 98:14 98:17 99:08 99:13 100:08 100:17 101:20 104:04 109:06 111:19 112:02 112:22 113:05 113:19 115:10 130:05 132:15 132:21 133:13 133:19 133:21 135:24 136:03 141:16 141:20 156:08 156:13 156:18 164:20 165:03 165:07 165:18 165:21 166:03 166:12 166:17 166:22 165:14 165:18 165:25 166:09 166:14 166:19 167:04 167:06 167:10 Form; Vague/Ambiguous Asked & Answered Form; Misstates Prior Testimony Compound Form Foundation Foundation 110:6-11 130:6-131:7 Form Form Form Form; Leading; Vague/Ambiguous Form; Vague/Ambiguous; Compound Form Form Form Calls for Legal Conclusion; Form Form, Mischaracterizes Evidence Lack of Personal Knowledge; Speculation; Form; Foundation Form Form; Compound; Vague/Ambiguous Form; Mischaracterizes Evidence Form Form Compound; Form; Vague/Ambiguous, Hearsay Form 84 167:13 167:16 167:13 167:23 168:02 168:11 168:22 169:05 168:09 168:11 169:02 169:10 169:12 169:13 Compound; Form; Vague/Ambiguous; Hearsay Form; Compound; Hearsay Form Form; Argumentative; Mischaracterizes Prior Testimony and Evidence Omit objection (169:12) Deponent: PATRICIA PERRUZZA Date of Deposition: September 24, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 038:03 041:20 049:22 063:11 063:20 064:15 069:18 076:16 091:16 097:25 102:18 107:10 108:03 109:02 110:09 113:07 114:22 115:18 116:03 118:01 130:10 132:25 133:21 135:02 135:23 136:21 141:01 End 38:25 42:01 50:03 63:12 64:01 65:10 70:15 77:10 93:10 100:22 105:11 107:14 108:11 109:12 110:21 113:16 115:14 115:25 117:01 118:16 131:05 133:09 133:23 135:16 136:02 138:04 141:21 Objection(s) 85 Counter-designation 142:23 143:13 144:02 148:01 150:04 158:06 158:24 163:07 163:23 171:02 174:16 175:25 178:10 181:20 185:09 186:07 188:02 192:12 201:23 203:18 207:17 208:11 210:24 211:08 211:17 212:07 214:24 216:09 217:05 217:11 223:21 224:04 226:13 227:12 229:19 236:11 237:14 238:25 240:05 241:10 244:14 248:11 251:13 252:07 253:11 143:09 143:24 145:02 148:18 152:06 158:15 162:03 163:22 164:25 171:09 175:10 176:08 180:06 185:02 185:25 187:06 189:15 193:12 202:21 206:20 208:04 209:22 211:06 211:09 212:05 213:22 215:06 216:19 217:07 217:21 224:02 225:04 227:04 229:11 230:19 237:11 238:02 239:21 240:24 243:08 245:23 249:10 252:04 252:20 253:15 86 257:09 258:01 258:10 263:07 263:10 267:05 267:24 268:01 270:13 272:15 273:19 277:06 279:25 283:17 284:09 286:01 294:15 307:23 257:23 258:02 259:20 263:08 265:03 267:14 267:24 269:09 271:23 272:25 274:23 279:16 280:03 284:05 285:05 288:08 295:09 308:24 Defendants’ Designations: Start 37:08 67:17 End 38:02 69:08 72:14 72:23 93:11 94:02 94:24 100:23 105:12 109:13 113:17 118:17 127:10 129:12 95:08 102:09 106:02 110:08 113:22 119:20 129:03 130:09 133:18 138:09 145:06 147:04 149:05 133:20 138:17 145:18 147:16 149:24 Objection(s) Non-responsive (move to strike 68:1169:8) Non-responsive (move to strike 72:18 beginning with “In our audit plan …” through 72:23) Foundation; Hearsay; Non-Responsive (move to strike 93:22 beginning with “We also obtained …” through 94:2) Non-responsive (move to strike) Assumes Facts Not in Evidence Non-responsive (move to strike 129:24130:9) Assumes Facts Not in Evidence 87 Counter-designation 158:16 162:18 173:05 158:23 162:22 173:11 211:11 215:16 220:25 211:16 216:08 223:20 238:03 245:24 259:21 266:08 271:24 281:22 282:16 283:03 295:10 306:05 238:08 246:06 260:01 266:19 272:14 282:07 282:18 283:16 296:06 307:22 Non-Responsive - Move to Strike 173:811) Non-Responsive - Move to Strike (222:10-13) Non-Responsive – Move to Strike Hearsay (266:13-19) Hearsay (272:5-10) Deponent: PATRICIA PERRUZZA Date of Deposition: September 25, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 041:14 041:17 041:19 043:18 051:05 052:06 052:14 053:14 054:13 054:24 055:21 056:16 062:16 069:21 071:17 081:05 084:04 084:18 End 041:15 041:17 043:03 044:10 051:13 052:12 052:20 053:23 054:22 055:17 056:09 059:05 062:22 070:17 072:02 081:21 084:12 085:06 Objection(s) 88 Counter-designation 085:13 095:11 100:22 103:24 110:08 113:24 115:02 119:03 124:23 127:18 131:22 134:11 134:24 140:16 140:25 141:18 143:06 145:20 150:10 152:19 153:18 155:04 167:06 170:12 171:12 182:19 189:18 209:07 221:03 226:11 230:15 232:06 235:09 085:23 095:16 101:21 104:13 110:13 114:11 115:23 119:16 126:20 128:02 133:05 134:15 138:08 140:23 141:11 142:25 144:23 146:10 151:19 153:04 153:25 156:02 167:25 170:25 171:19 184:19 190:08 210:15 221:08 226:20 231:02 233:04 238:05 258:18 258:24 282:25 335:22 344:02 344:22 283:05 336:04 0344:07 346:20 Foundation; Vague; Mischaracterizes the Evidence Defendants’ Designations: Start 43:09 53:24 End 43:17 54:12 Objection(s) No question pending 89 Counter-designation 62:10 62:15 62:23 70:18 85:07 94:20 101:22 112:23 122:04 126:21 134:16 63:02 70:19 85:12 95:10 103:19 113:23 122:14 127:17 134:23 144:24 153:05 220:23 231:03 145:19 153:17 221:02 231:14 233:05 Question Stricken by Counsel (62:1012), non-responsive (move to strike “that’s not our obligation to.”) 235:04 Lack of Personal Knowledge, Speculation Lack of Personal Knowledge, Speculation Deponent: ANDRES PIEDRAHITA Date of Deposition: June 5, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 31:09 32:24 35:03 36:02 40:24 112:16 134:20 139:13 171:07 172:15 215:10 219:15 221:22 239:10 241:25 253:04 255:08 End 31:14 33:18 35:20 37:07 41:12 113:02 135:19 140:05 171:24 172:21 217:11 220:02 222:10 240:21 243:19 253:10 255:18 Objection(s) 90 Counter-designation 265:13 266:04 268:04 280:14 284:25 265:20 267:20 268:14 281:02 285:20 Defendants’ Designations: Start 48:11 End 49:04 51:09 53:09 53:15 55:20 54:10 56:25 57:09 58:14 64:16 57:14 59:03 65:06 86:17 90:25 87:05 92:21 92:25 93:09 93:25 95:02 111:02 113:09 113:22 114:05 94:08 95:06 111:19 113:17 113:24 114:09 114:25 117:14 118:04 120:07 122:02 123:20 127:03 134:14 139:10 140:06 171:03 115:04 117:21 119:02 120:10 123:09 124:04 127:11 134:19 139:12 140:21 171:06 Objection(s) Foundation, Speculation, Lack of personal knowledge (48:18-49:4) Foundation, Speculation, Lack of personal knowledge; Hearsay; Assumes facts not in evidence Assumes facts not in evidence Relevance; 403; Incomplete – if objections overruled, add 57:2-8 Relevance; 403 Relevance; 403 Foundation; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 64:11-15 Non-responsive – move to strike (91:2092:4, starting at “and we”); Hearsay Hearsay; lack of personal knowledge (93:8-9, starting at “we thought”) Incomplete Form, leading (111:9-11); Incomplete Form; Foundation Form; Foundation; Vague/Ambiguous Form; Foundation; Vague/Ambiguous; Non-responsive – move to strike (114:69) Best Evidence Form; Foundation; Leading (123:3-9) Form, foundation, leading Form, foundation, leading Form, foundation, leading 91 Counter-designation 94:9-13 111:20-22 171:25 172:22 174:14 175:13 177:16 180:02 189:10 172:08 173:14 175:10 176:02 177:23 181:16 189:22 193:19 194:07 240:22 243:20 240:24 245:14 267:22 276:10 279:25 268:03 276:20 279:25 277:11 278:21 277:18 278:24 279:04 280:04 281:03 284:06 285:21 288:07 288:15 289:10 282:14 284:17 285:25 288:10 288:19 289:19 Incomplete 173:15-18 Form; foundation; calls for legal conclusion Form; foundation; misstatements prior testimony; duplicative Relevance, 403 Form, leading, foundation, speculation; duplicative Form, leading Form, foundation, calls for expert opinion and legal conclusion Form, foundation, calls for expert opinion and legal conclusion Form, foundation, calls for expert opinion and legal conclusion Form, duplicative Incomplete 284:18-24 Relevance; 403 Deponent: DUNCAN POLLOCK Date of Deposition: July 19, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 10:25 11:13 12:12 16:20 21:06 23:05 33:12 43:03 End 11:03 11:19 13:12 18:17 22:16 23:25 33:19 43:17 Objection(s) 92 Counter-designation 58:07 59:14 62:03 63:24 65:17 80:11 96:22 112:07 122:06 122:22 124:02 130:04 142:13 145:03 145:24 149:19 178:20 205:18 207:05 219:08 245:19 257:18 258:21 277:03 278:05 284:15 290:08 58:15 59:23 62:10 64:04 65:20 80:18 97:03 112:16 122:15 123:11 125:10 130:10 143:09 145:08 146:06 150:08 179:15 206:22 207:18 220:04 246:11 258:08 258:25 277:14 278:14 285:10 290:14 Lack of foundation (901) Lack of foundation (901) Relevance (402, 403) Defendants’ Designations: Start 11:20 12:9 39:21 48:6 End 11:25 12:11 40:5 48:19 49:7 51:19 54:14 54:23 57:15 58:16 60:3 78:24 80:19 Objection(s) Relevance Relevance 49:17 52:8 54:17 55:9 58:6 59:13 60:18 79:25 80:24 Relevance; Incomplete – if objection overruled, add 47:20-48:5; 48:20-23 93 Counter-Designation 81:14 82:9 90:8 93:16 97:4 100:11 106:22 115:10 82:5 82:17 90:24 94:3 97:9 102:10 107:7 116:5 117:11 118:25 131:4 133:10 134:14 135:21 136:15 140:12 143:10 154:24 156:18 118:5 119:18 131:13 134:7 135:3 136:6 137:5 141:4 143:13 155:6 157:3 162:10 163:17 179:16 180:16 188:3 196:14 277:15 278:16 279:17 281:23 285:18 163:8 165:3 180:4 180:23 188:17 196:16 277:20 279:13 280:15 282:3 285:25 289:2 289:18 290:15 289:7 289:21 292:5 293:21 294:8 299:17 294:5 294:13 299:24 Incomplete 90:25-91:5 Incomplete 114:13-115:9; 116:613 Incomplete 119:19-22 Argumentative Argumentative; Assumes facts Not in Evidence; Mischaracterizes Prior Testimony Incomplete Incomplete 196:10-13 277:15-20 [not incomplete, but should have designated these lines] 285:11-13 Duplicative; Mischaracterizes prior testimony Form; Speculation; FRE 702 Form; Speculation; FRE 702 Vague/Ambiguous; 403 Deponent: RICHARD ROUTHIER 94 Date of Deposition: August 24, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 11:14 13:02 13:10 14:07 24:20 26:09 28:08 29:03 29:25 30:15 36:04 38:22 63:24 64:18 71:11 71:23 75:11 88:07 94:19 96:23 97:06 132:16 141:15 155:24 End 11:21 13:06 13:14 17:17 26:02 26:11 28:19 29:05 30:05 34:14 36:14 38:25 64:05 65:18 71:17 72:03 75:14 88:11 94:25 97:03 97:15 133:05 141:23 156:11 Objection(s) Counter-designation Lack of foundation Lack of foundation Lack of foundation Leading Defendants’ Designations: Start 17:18 36:15 57:23 68:05 87:03 87:14 91:15 110:07 122:19 123:08 140:16 141:24 End 17:20 36:20 58:07 68:12 87:11 88:06 91:24 110:15 123:03 123:17 141:14 142:06 Objection(s) 95 Counter-designation 143:20 144:09 153:10 155:04 158:08 144:04 144:21 154:16 155:23 158:22 Non-responsive (move to strike 158:13 beginning with “What I remember” through 158:22) Deponent: ABDUL SAIF Date of Deposition: September 20, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 33:07 34:22 40:04 63:14 64:24 65:14 68:17 73:04 74:08 77:08 79:06 81:22 84:20 89:07 91:17 93:14 121:19 122:18 131:19 142:04 157:20 159:02 159:11 160:24 165:06 180:21 End 34:03 37:03 40:18 64:22 65:10 65:20 69:08 73:08 75:05 78:06 79:25 82:22 85:08 90:04 92:08 94:08 122:06 123:22 132:15 143:07 158:14 159:04 160:05 161:14 165:12 182:15 Objection(s) Defendants’ Designations: 96 Counter-designation Start 8:10 12:3 17:22 18:21 26:17 27:11 28:24 37:4 51:14 53:18 66:18 End 8:14 13:9 17:24 19:18 27:3 27:20 29:3 37:9 52:12 54:3 67:5 67:7 70:10 88:15 94:18 122:7 123:23 133:10 67:12 70:17 89:2 95:3 122:17 124:22 134:16 Objection(s) Counter-designation Incomplete Relevance (19:11-18) 17:25-18:10 Incomplete 28:13-16; 29:4 Foundation; Relevance; 403 Foundation; Relevance; 403 Form; Vague/Ambiguous; Incomplete – if objections overruled, add 66:17 Form; Vague/Ambiguous FRE 702 Deponent: ABDUL SAIF Date of Deposition: September 21, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 222:20 255:14 256:08 256:23 258:02 259:04 263:19 265:08 266:14 273:21 End 224:02 256:03 256:14 257:09 258:19 259:15 263:25 265:17 267:13 274:08 Objection(s) Counter-designation Objection(s) Counter-designation Defendants’ Designations: Start 260:7 261:25 End 260:10 262:18 97 262:25 263:11 265:18 267:14 272:5 273:2 263:9 263:18 265:21 267:20 272:11 273:11 Duplicative Duplicative Duplicative Deponent: DOROTHY SANFORD Date of Deposition: July 25, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 030:04 034:14 035:08 038:20 039:11 040:13 041:11 049:05 049:19 061:09 062:07 065:19 073:21 074:25 077:04 080:13 081:04 090:25 094:02 103:15 106:02 108:17 112:15 116:20 120:13 121:16 123:22 125:06 126:12 127:21 End 030:08 034:23 035:17 038:25 039:23 040:19 042:22 049:15 050:02 061:20 064:02 065:24 073:25 075:08 077:20 080:18 081:20 091:14 095:20 105:02 107:02 109:09 113:25 119:25 120:22 122:07 124:12 125:11 126:18 128:07 Objection(s) 98 Counter-designation 128:14 133:24 137:04 138:21 139:24 140:23 145:15 146:13 148:03 156:21 157:05 158:21 160:09 161:23 165:15 166:11 170:03 174:24 177:13 178:11 182:02 185:02 186:24 129:08 135:10 138:03 139:05 140:09 142:24 145:19 146:20 148:13 156:24 157:12 158:25 160:21 162:13 166:02 166:22 170:14 175:09 178:03 181:14 182:10 185:11 189:06 Defendants’ Designations: Start 29:21 38:05 39:02 42:23 43:14 64:03 72:24 74:12 82:22 89:08 90:11 90:21 101:17 107:06 111:22 122:16 135:11 136:20 End 30:03 38:19 39:04 43:03 43:25 64:09 73:12 74:24 83:03 89:19 90:15 90:24 101:23 107:21 112:06 123:08 135:21 137:03 Objection(s) Counter-designation Incomplete add 135:22-24, 136:2- 99 19 142:25 145:09 157:20 161:16 162:14 164:15 143:15 145:13 158:02 161:22 163:10 164:23 : Deponent: CHRISTOPHER SMEETS Date of Deposition: June 20, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 88:16 92:15 156:08 196:06 199:25 209:15 264:05 272:06 End 91:06 94:04 161:10 197:11 200:24 211:06 266:18 273:03 329:02 332:17 332:24 Objection(s) Counter-designation 329:24 332:23 333:09 Foundation; Prejudicial; Vague; Confusing Defendants’ Designations: Start 91:07 96:23 97:13 101:15 102:21 106:21 111:24 End 92:14 97:10 97:13 102:18 103:09 107:18 112:11 112:20 113:06 113:21 115:04 115:18 112:24 113:11 114:04 115:11 115:24 Objection(s) Argumentative (move to strike 91:7-8) Counter-designation Form Form; Non-Responsive (move to strike 112:7-11) Incomplete Incomplete Incomplete No Question Pending (move to strike); 100 112:25-113:5 113:12-20 114:5-19 116:10 116:16 120:10 121:09 122:23 120:19 121:17 123:07 123:23 130:14 124:11 130:22 131:21 134:11 136:07 141:14 151:13 153:15 153:24 154:25 156:03 160:15 162:19 162:23 180:13 182:14 187:04 216:06 131:25 135:19 137:04 141:22 152:05 153:17 154:02 155:08 156:07 160:22 162:21 162:23 181:14 182:20 189:16 217:21 218:04 218:14 219:16 234:21 235:21 237:10 247:23 249:06 251:02 252:07 254:08 266:19 267:10 218:11 218:19 220:05 235:08 236:20 238:14 248:05 250:20 251:06 253:06 254:23 267:06 267:14 271:08 271:11 271:14 271:16 in the alternative add 115:25-116:9 Best Evidence; No Question Pending (move to strike) Best Evidence; Speculation Hearsay Best evidence; Lack of personal knowledge Form; Argumentative; Move to strike – in the alternative if objection is denied add 131:13-17, 113:19-20 in its place Relevance Form Incomplete Foundation Foundation No Question Pending (Move to Strike) No Question Pending (Move to Strike 217:19-21) No Question Pending (Move to Strike) Best Evidence Non-Responsive (move to strike 267:1013, ending with “in that fashion.”) Lack of Personal Knowledge; Speculation Lack of Personal Knowledge; 101 152:14-15 Speculation 312:25 314:10 315:20 317:02 319:06 320:12 321:04 322:02 322:05 322:20 324:09 325:08 325:25 326:05 313:08 315:16 316:10 318:18 319:16 320:15 321:20 322:03 322:16 322:22 324:14 325:20 326:02 326:24 Incomplete Relevance Relevance; Incomplete Form 321:23-25 322:18-19 Foundation Deponent: GERRIT SMIT Date of Deposition: October 18, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 25:09 28:11 31:09 32:04 35:01 41:04 44:05 47:15 End 25:25 29:07 31:20 32:21 36:16 41:19 47:04 48:04 48:08 54:13 56:01 57:09 59:19 61:09 62:18 50:24 55:11 56:25 57:14 60:11 61:21 63:22 65:15 66:08 70:13 72:14 Objection(s) 65:25 67:04 70:22 73:23 Vague. Confuses the issues. Vague. Calls for speculation. Confuses the issues. Prejudicial. Vague. Calls for speculation. Improper characterization of the facts. Confuses the issues. Prejudicial. 102 Counter-designation 78:06 81:09 81:20 83:24 85:14 88:13 93:04 79:21 81:10 81:25 84:03 86:03 89:19 96:04 96:15 97:08 102:18 103:12 106:04 112:11 113:09 106:17 112:25 113:22 114:22 116:17 115:18 117:11 117:17 119:08 120:09 121:25 124:10 125:21 128:14 132:11 133:17 137:23 139:07 141:09 118:25 119:23 121:03 122:23 125:11 125:23 129:19 133:01 134:05 138:09 139:12 142:23 Vague. Improper characterization of the facts. Prejudicial. Calls for speculation. Confuses the issues. Prejudicial. Mischaracterizes prior testimony. Argumentative. Prejudicial. Improper characterization of the facts. Confusion of the issues. Prejudicial. Calls for speculation. Mischaracterizes prior testimony. Improper characterization of the facts. Prejudicial. Argumentative. Prejudicial. Defendants’ Designations: Start 26:01 68:04 69:07 71:25 End 27:05 68:25 70:01 72:02 Objection(s) Relevance Relevance Relevance (69:7-22) Deponent: ROBIN TAYLOR 103 Counter-designation Date of Deposition: July 26, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 10:25 17:23 18:14 19:13 22:12 37:13 38:06 40:10 42:06 44:06 45:06 54:06 55:16 76:25 79:21 81:23 87:12 89:06 89:24 90:17 91:09 93:12 95:08 98:09 101:06 105:06 111:07 111:20 112:23 116:12 119:18 126:24 134:20 136:12 137:12 138:24 143:22 146:13 147:08 154:07 End 11:10 18:05 18:17 19:17 22:16 37:25 38:15 40:16 42:15 44:14 45:10 54:21 55:25 77:11 80:07 82:03 87:20 89:19 90:05 90:21 91:12 93:20 95:25 99:14 101:16 110:08 111:09 112:04 113:25 117:12 120:23 127:06 135:24 136:18 137:20 141:17 145:05 146:22 147:14 154:23 Objection(s) 104 Counter-designation 158:15 159:20 162:23 166:20 169:05 175:15 177:02 185:07 189:14 201:09 207:13 209:06 212:06 235:07 240:11 245:24 248:12 249:05 250:18 252:25 255:16 258:24 259:04 260:05 262:05 269:09 275:07 284:04 286:22 288:11 289:13 293:25 295:18 297:04 298:15 300:18 304:05 305:23 159:10 160:20 163:09 166:25 170:04 175:24 177:13 185:20 191:02 201:21 207:18 209:21 212:10 235:24 240:24 247:23 248:22 250:08 250:24 253:07 255:21 258:25 259:19 262:04 267:17 274:20 281:09 285:25 288:02 288:16 290:03 294:18 295:25 297:23 300:12 303:24 305:10 306:22 Defendants’ Designations: Start 19:21 44:15 56:02 End 20:13 45:04 56:15 Objection(s) Counter-designation Incomplete 45:4 105 77:22 79:06 80:10 81:11 88:24 91:04 91:13 94:19 99:15 102:13 104:17 112:16 120:24 121:24 134:08 135:25 143:14 146:23 153:11 155:16 161:22 165:11 167:16 184:13 191:03 206:19 208:07 212:11 212:25 253:08 268:02 281:10 282:02 289:04 294:22 305:11 306:23 78:05 79:20 80:15 81:22 89:05 91:08 91:21 95:03 99:19 103:13 105:05 112:22 121:02 122:03 134:19 136:11 143:21 147:07 154:06 155:21 162:22 166:19 167:24 185:06 191:10 207:12 209:05 212:14 213:04 254:19 268:19 281:20 283:07 289:12 295:17 305:22 307:22 Incomplete 95:4-7 121:3-10, 121:19-23 Incomplete 155:8-15 (cut objection at 206:24-25) 221:5-12 Deponent: JEFFREY TUCKER Date of Deposition: June 27, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: 106 Start 14:23 20:19 22:06 33:08 34:05 37:09 38:19 39:24 41:03 42:05 44:05 45:05 45:15 47:03 62:19 71:16 101:21 110:02 123:03 148:14 190:03 217:21 End 17:16 21:04 22:13 33:18 35:02 37:16 39:07 40:22 41:08 42:16 44:14 45:08 46:07 50:14 64:18 71:21 102:09 110:08 124:20 149:04 197:13 219:22 222:07 238:05 248:21 250:04 254:05 Objection(s) Counter-designation 237:20 240:09 249:04 253:08 255:02 Calls for expert testimony (701-703) Calls for speculation (602) Lack of personal knowledge (602) Misleading (402, 403) More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Defendants’ Designations: Start 25:04 30:18 End 29:06 32:03 32:06 58:07 59:15 60:20 61:18 32:11 59:05 60:11 61:16 61:18 Objection(s) Form, foundation, leading; no answer designated for 32:2-3 Form, foundation, leading Form, leading, foundation (61:13-16) Form, leading, foundation 107 Counter-designation 62:04 64:19 65:18 62:18 65:16 66:08 66:12 66:18 67:25 66:14 67:04 68:10 68:12 69:03 69:07 84:09 86:03 70:24 85:10 87:18 87:24 88:11 88:16 88:25 98:14 88:08 88:13 88:23 88:25 100:09 100:24 101:02 101:04 101:04 107:14 107:24 108:02 108:04 108:06 108:07 108:10 108:10 109:20 109:22 109:24 109:25 110:09 113:23 114:02 114:18 116:03 117:04 118:14 114:15 115:09 116:04 118:11 118:17 Relevance, 403 Form, leading, foundation (65:10-16) Form, leading, foundation (65:18-21); form, leading, foundation, compound (65:22-66:8) Form, leading, foundation, compound Form, leading, foundation, compound Form, leading, foundation, compound (67:25-68:10) Form, leading, foundation, compound (68:12-15) Form, leading, foundation, compound (87:13-18) Form, leading, foundation (88:6-8) Form, leading, foundation, compound Form, leading, foundation, compound Form, leading, foundation, compound Hearsay (99:17-100:9); foundation; lacks personal knowledge; speculation Form; foundation; vague/ambiguous; speculation Form; foundation; vague/ambiguous; speculation Form; foundation; lacks personal knowledge Form; foundation; lacks personal knowledge Form; foundation; lacks personal knowledge Form; foundation; lacks personal knowledge Form; foundation; assumes facts not in evidence Form; foundation; assumes facts not in evidence Hearsay (110:24-111:9, 111:17-25, 112:5-6, 112:19); Form, leading (113:21-23) Form, foundation, hearsay (114:13-15) Form, foundation, hearsay (114:18) Hearsay (118:9-11) Form, foundation, speculation 108 118:20 119:14 124:21 126:04 127:05 138:16 118:22 119:21 125:22 126:23 128:16 140:02 140:08 145:02 149:05 155:18 156:21 157:04 140:11 145:21 149:17 156:18 157:02 157:08 161:24 188:18 189:18 197:16 200:18 202:16 203:08 205:09 207:24 208:04 210:18 211:15 162:04 189:15 189:18 198:06 201:05 203:03 203:08 206:21 207:25 209:06 211:12 211:17 211:19 211:24 212:05 212:08 212:05 212:25 213:05 213:21 213:23 214:15 214:17 214:20 215:04 216:03 216:07 216:11 216:13 216:13 Form, foundation Hearsay (127:5-17) Calls for legal conclusion, lack of personal knowledge (138:16-23) Hearsay Form, foundation (156:15-18) Form, foundation, leading Form, leading; non-responsive, move to strike (157:7-8) Form, leading (189:11-15) Form, leading (189:11-15) Form, foundation (202:23-203:3) Form, foundation Form, vague/ambiguous Form, vague/ambiguous (208:4-10) Form, leading, compound (211:5-12) Form, leading, compound (211:15); Form, relevance (211:16-17) Form, relevance (211:19); Form, calls for expert opinion (211:20-24) Form, calls for expert opinion Form, leading, compound, foundation (212:21-25) Form, vague/ambiguous, leading (213:19-21) Form, vague/ambiguous, leading (213:23); Form, vague/ambiguous, leading, compound (214:8-15) Form, vague/ambiguous, leading, compound Form, foundation, vague/ambiguous, compound (215:22-216:3) Form, foundation, vague/ambiguous, speculation Form, foundation, vague/ambiguous, speculation 109 216:16 217:20 219:23 217:17 217:20 222:06 239:14 240:15 240:19 242:02 244:10 244:19 245:20 246:05 244:13 245:16 245:25 246:16 246:19 247:15 248:11 248:20 249:05 255:24 257:02 257:22 262:19 263:24 266:25 267:07 248:17 248:20 249:12 256:14 257:20 257:22 263:20 264:12 267:05 267:24 268:02 270:02 270:18 269:23 270:13 271:13 Form, foundation (217:13-17) Form, foundation Non-responsive – move to strike (220:513); Hearsay (221:19-222:6) Form, misstates the evidence (240:1015) Form, misstates the evidence (240:1920) Form, leading, assumes facts not in evidence, foundation (246:9-16) Form, leading, assumes facts not in evidence, foundation (246:19) Form, leading, foundation (248:16-17) Form, leading, foundation Best Evidence Form, compound Form, compound (267:7-11); form, leading (267:22-24) Form, leading (268:2) Deponent: JEFFREY TUCKER Date of Deposition: June 28, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 304:21 End 305:06 Objection(s) Calls for expert testimony (701-703) Calls for speculation (602) Lack of personal knowledge (602) Misleading (402, 403) More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 110 Counter-designation 305:09 306:23 307:07 307:18 310:18 315:07 307:11 310:04 311:16 316:02 324:02 325:23 372:04 378.02 382:09 384:11 386:04 324:20 327:02 377.25 381:24 384:04 385:04 387:15 388:07 390:05 390:14 394:09 396:17 398:11 403:02 393:10 394:12 397:16 402:25 404:25 405:03 407:18 407:21 408:17 411:12 412:09 414:05 415:08 419:06 Calls for expert testimony (701-703) Calls for speculation (602) Lack of personal knowledge (602) Misleading (402, 403) More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Lack of foundation (602) 407:24 410:19 411:20 412:23 414:19 418:19 419:25 Calls for expert testimony (701-703) Calls for speculation (602) Lack of personal knowledge (602) Misleading (402, 403) Calls for speculation (602) Misleading (402, 403) Assumes facts not in evidence (602) Designates a question without an answer (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703) Calls for speculation (602) Lack of personal knowledge (602) Misleading (402, 403) 111 420:02 422:17 420:25 423:17 425:25 432:24 438:15 426:10 436:12 441:05 445:15 445:23 447:21 448:11 459:16 445:19 446:25 448:02 450:15 459:21 460:08 461:05 461:25 463:02 465:06 466:03 469:18 470:21 471:16 473:03 470:18 471:09 472:07 475:23 476:04 477:06 478:10 479:03 Calls for expert testimony (701-703) Calls for speculation (602) Lack of personal knowledge (602) Misleading (402, 403) More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Misleading (402, 403) Calls for speculation (602) Lack of personal knowledge (602) Misleading (402, 403) More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Misleading (402, 403) Misleading (402, 403) Misleading (402, 403) More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Misleading (402, 403) More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703) Calls for speculation (602) Misleading (402, 403) More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403) Calls for speculation (602) Misleading (402, 403) Improperly characterizes the evidence (402, 403) 112 490:22 491:24 493:20 514:17 516:14 491:15 493:11 507:05 516:07 516:22 Defendants’ Designations: Start 307:02 311:22 312:05 312:09 312:15 313:23 314:04 314:19 315:06 315:12 315:19 317:07 317:14 318:07 318:23 319:04 319:13 319:17 319:23 320:06 322:25 323:04 323:17 323:25 325:07 325:13 328:09 328:13 328:18 356:06 357:07 361:02 361:11 387:16 390:06 390:13 End 307:06 312:02 312:07 312:12 312:25 314:02 314:17 315:04 315:09 315:17 315:19 317:12 317:14 318:11 319:02 319:04 319:15 319:21 320:04 320:06 323:02 323:15 323:23 323:25 325:10 325:13 328:11 328:16 328:19 357:04 357:10 361:08 361:13 388:02 390:11 390:13 Objection(s) Relevance Counter-designation Incomplete Question without an answer (361:6-8) 357:11-17 113 396:11 397:17 397:21 398:05 398:10 405:02 436:13 436:18 437:02 437:07 452:16 452:20 453:03 457:18 458:02 458:10 458:15 461:19 466:23 467:05 467:08 467:11 467:17 475:24 476:03 511:11 513:20 396:14 397:19 397:21 398:08 398:10 405:02 436:16 436:24 437:05 437:20 452:18 452:23 453:03 457:24 458:04 458:13 458:15 461:24 467:03 467:06 467:09 467:15 467:17 475:25 476:03 511:14 513:23 Incomplete 396:16 Incomplete 458:5-9 Incomplete 458:16-25 Duplicative Duplicative Duplicative Duplicative Duplicative Incomplete 510:16-511:10 Deponent: ALBERT VAN NIJEN Date of Deposition: November 8, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 9:16 10:12 10:25 End 9:21 10:20 13:08 Objection(s) 13:11 19:20 Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 21:12 21:25 24:14 21:23 22:04 24:25 114 Counter-designation 25:02 26:10 26:20 26:24 29:06 29:21 31:07 31:17 32:12 33:06 33:11 33:20 34:03 25:11 26:19 26:22 27:02 29:15 30:12 31:12 32:02 32:22 33:09 33:18 33:25 34:13 Calls for expert testimony (701-703) Calls for expert testimony (701-703) 34:15 34:21 35:03 36:02 36:08 34:18 34:25 35:07 36:06 37:09 Calls for expert testimony (701-703) 37:11 37:14 37:16 39:05 40:05 40:15 41:03 41:16 42:06 42:12 43:11 44:24 47:03 48:20 49:02 50:21 50:25 52:22 54:05 54:13 55:10 37:20 40:03 40:13 40:25 41:14 42:04 42:10 43:08 43:16 45:14 48:18 48:24 49:07 50:23 51:12 54:03 54:11 54:22 56:14 Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 115 57:02 61:24 62:05 62:19 63:04 66:04 66:24 67:13 67:24 68:06 69:02 70:02 70:05 70:09 72:07 72:14 73:03 73:16 74:02 74:24 75:07 75:24 76:13 76:22 77:02 77:05 77:11 77:21 78:02 78:07 78:15 79:05 79:17 82:12 83:10 83:18 61:22 62:03 62:17 63:02 63:11 66:15 67:11 67:22 68:04 68:25 69:25 70:03 70:07 70:22 72:12 72:21 73:14 73:21 74:22 75:05 75:22 76:11 76:20 76:25 77:03 77:09 77:19 77:25 78:05 78:13 78:16 79:11 82:10 83:08 83:11 84:25 85:02 85:07 85:14 85:23 Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 116 85:25 87:14 Form (402, 403); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 87:24 88:03 Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 88:06 88:08 88:10 Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 89:13 Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 89:16 90:20 Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 90:25 91:06 93:09 94:04 94:20 95:12 95:19 96:15 97:02 97:05 97:18 98:05 98:14 100:10 101:02 91:04 93:07 94:02 94:18 95:10 95:17 96:13 96:25 97:03 97:16 98:03 98:12 98:25 100:20 102:17 102:20 105:06 Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 117 105:08 106:03 106:09 112:14 113:10 114:10 116:06 116:12 117:03 117:13 123:13 123:22 124:07 125:13 125:23 126:08 128:02 129:02 130:07 130:18 130:23 131:07 132:18 133:17 134:04 134:19 134:25 135:02 135:06 136:14 139:18 143:17 145:09 147:04 147:13 147:21 148:20 149:03 155:17 159:07 159:20 160:10 160:23 161:04 105:21 106:08 112:07 113:08 114:08 116:04 116:10 116:24 117:11 117:15 123:20 124:05 125:11 125:21 126:06 127:25 128:24 130:06 130:14 130:21 131:04 131:14 133:15 134:02 135:16 134:23 134:25 135:04 136:10 139:16 140:18 145:07 146:09 147:11 147:19 148:18 148:25 150:06 156:03 159:18 160:08 160:12 161:02 161:19 118 161:21 161:24 162:14 165:20 166:05 166:21 168:16 168:24 169:11 169:19 170:14 173:23 174:02 161:22 162:12 164:09 165:25 166:19 168:14 168:22 169:09 169:17 170:12 171:05 173:25 174:22 174:25 175:08 Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 175:11 175:15 Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 175:17 175:22 Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 175:24 176:23 Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 177:02 177:09 Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 119 probative (402, 403) 177:11 177:14 Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 177:16 177:25 Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 178:02 178:22 Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) 178:24 179:24 181:11 182:06 184:05 198:09 199:02 210:23 211:02 211:07 211:14 211:20 212:07 220:12 221:22 222:03 222:12 223:09 224:10 224:21 226:05 226:14 226:18 228:03 229:04 179:21 180:06 182:05 182:20 185:04 198:25 199:02 210:25 211:05 211:12 211:16 212:06 212:13 221:20 221:25 222:10 223:07 224:07 224:19 224:25 226:12 226:16 227:23 229:02 229:20 120 229:22 230:20 231:01 231:24 232:18 230:18 230:23 231:21 232:02 233:05 233:07 233:11 233:15 234:04 234:11 234:17 234:22 235:13 235:19 236:16 239:17 241:02 242:02 244:12 245:16 245:23 248:18 249:02 249:07 250:02 250:07 251:02 251:11 260:04 261:21 262:02 262:07 234:02 234:09 234:15 234:20 235:12 235:17 235:21 239:04 240:25 241:25 243:04 245:14 245:21 246:06 248:25 249:05 249:25 250:05 250:25 251:08 251:18 260:14 261:25 262:05 262:09 Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); Misleading (402, 403); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Defendants’ Designations: Start End Objection(s) 121 Counter-designation 38:22 65:05 39:04 65:22 150:07 150:19 152:03 154:14 155:04 155:07 150:16 150:24 152:10 154:25 155:05 155:10 155:12 155:16 189:13 254:05 254:09 255:10 256:05 189:17 254:07 254:13 255:19 256:08 256:10 256:16 Incomplete (include 63:12-14 [ending with “first page of the document.”]) No answer provided (move to strike) Non-Responsive (move to strike 155:79) Non-Responsive (move to strike 155:12 beginning with “As far as I know …” and ending with “also as” at 155:14) Improper Lay Testimony (Fed.R.Evid. 701) Deponent: DANIEL VAN VEEN Date of Deposition: October 22, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 29:16 32:18 35:11 37:17 41:14 44:06 46:10 47:04 49:01 50:14 54:04 59:05 62:15 64:07 78:11 95:16 End 30:20 32:25 36:09 39:06 42:05 44:25 46:20 47:18 49:22 53:08 58:18 60:04 62:24 76:01 89:25 99:25 Objection(s) Improper characterization of the facts. Improper characterization of the facts. 122 Counter-designation 105:10 107:01 108:20 112:05 114:01 117:23 118:03 130:10 133:03 140:18 143:18 154:25 162:02 166:04 168:21 172:05 176:24 177:13 178:13 179:11 183:03 186:01 191:12 193:14 196:09 202:12 203:11 206:01 211:17 214:24 221:12 223:23 224:23 230:11 234:11 236:08 239:09 241:05 242:25 251:06 256:04 260:07 263:06 130:06 131:19 136:09 143:01 154:10 156:24 165:15 168:14 171:20 174:19 177:04 178:01 179:05 179:23 185:23 191:09 193:09 196:04 201:22 202:25 205:21 211:14 214:21 220:25 222:17 224:20 229:17 233:03 235:24 238:24 240:23 242:21 245:25 254:12 259:17 261:22 264:11 Assumes facts not in evidence. Calls for speculation. Calls for speculation. Assumes facts not in evidence. Improper characterization of the evidence. Foundation. Improper characterization of the facts. Confuses the issues. Improper characterization of the facts. Improper characterization of the facts. Improper characterization of the facts. 123 281:01 283:12 282:21 285:08 Defendants’ Designations: Start 28:18 93:07 94:15 94:24 100:08 104:06 105:02 End 29:10 93:11 94:16 95:02 100:13 104:22 105:09 157:22 Objection(s) Counter-designation 158:08 Foundation Foundation Foundation Incomplete (include 100:1-4) Speculation; Hearsay Speculation; Lack of Personal Knowledge Deponent: MICHEL VAN ZANTEN Date of Deposition: June 13, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 7:16 8:02 9:23 11:06 12:15 15:24 16:12 19:02 20:22 23:06 23:18 26:10 27:18 28:14 37:09 39:04 39:20 39:22 40:05 42:09 43:08 End 7:19 8:12 10:19 11:18 14:09 16:05 17:05 20:05 23:04 23:16 23:21 27:04 28:09 29:09 38:04 39:18 39:22 40:02 42:05 43:06 43:08 Objection(s) 124 Counter-designation 43:25 44:23 47:13 52:07 55:03 65:12 70:12 70:21 75:12 75:25 79:01 87:19 88:14 89:10 89:25 90:08 90:14 90:16 91:24 94:06 95:21 96:18 96:25 97:09 97:17 99:06 99:12 99:24 107:16 108:11 108:24 109:19 109:23 110:03 113:01 113:08 113:21 114:08 119:02 119:24 120:05 120:07 122:12 126:10 126:21 44:20 44:23 47:17 53:20 56:02 65:24 70:19 70:21 75:23 77:03 79:19 88:12 89:08 89:10 90:05 90:11 90:14 90:21 92:19 94:09 96:16 96:23 97:07 97:11 97:23 99:09 99:21 100:07 107:22 108:22 109:07 109:21 109:23 110:22 113:05 113:11 114:01 114:12 119:18 120:01 120:05 121:04 122:19 126:14 128:04 125 129:04 130:10 132:04 132:17 134:08 136:02 145:23 152:04 153:23 160:07 163:25 164:16 164:19 164:25 166:23 167:19 169:15 170:08 171:02 176:11 178:19 191:01 192:25 193:06 195:14 195:19 129:04 131:01 132:07 133:11 134:18 136:07 146:05 152:20 154:07 163:23 164:05 164:17 164:23 165:07 167:12 168:07 170:05 170:25 171:02 178:15 179:16 191:14 193:03 193:20 195:16 195:24 Defendants’ Designations: Start 44:25 End 45:11 53:21 59:16 60:07 62:02 62:08 66:16 69:11 69:23 69:25 70:08 70:10 54:12 59:24 60:22 62:05 62:11 66:25 69:19 69:23 70:05 70:08 70:11 Objection(s) Non-Responsive (move to strike beginning at 45:5 with “I would …” through 45:11) Lacks Personal Knowledge (54:10-12) Speculation 126 Counter-designation 70:23 71:03 73:09 77:04 77:21 91:01 98:13 100:08 100:13 70:25 71:04 74:11 77:15 77:24 91:09 99:05 100:11 100:17 109:08 114:13 115:06 116:08 117:06 117:08 117:12 117:14 123:18 124:20 124:25 109:16 114:25 115:10 117:03 117:06 117:08 117:12 117:17 123:25 124:23 125:16 129:21 140:09 140:17 140:20 141:04 130:09 140:15 140:18 141:01 141:21 146:06 175:01 188:19 188:23 188:25 191:15 193:21 194:08 195:06 195:12 196:16 196:22 196:24 199:18 200:11 200:24 201:01 146:09 175:09 188:21 188:23 190:25 192:23 193:24 194:18 195:09 195:12 196:19 196:22 197:04 199:25 200:21 200:24 201:15 Non-Responsive (move to strike 100:815, ending with “agency.”) Non-Responsive (move to strike 125:7 [beginning with “But also …”] -11) Lack of Personal Knowledge Speculation; Non-Responsive (move to strike 141:2-5) Lack of Personal Knowledge Stricken by counsel asking question 127 (move to strike 201:2-8) 201:18 202:07 209:09 209:15 201:18 202:10 209:11 209:15 Deponent: JOHN VERHOOREN Date of Deposition: September 6, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start End 7:01 7:21 8:04 28:04 28:20 36:06 39:23 42:15 45:02 45:09 85:14 90:20 117:05 118:08 119:11 121:23 122:19 123:04 128:05 129:08 129:19 134:21 136:08 136:13 136:16 141:13 144:17 148:04 150:25 152:06 152:17 Objection(s) 7:04 7:25 8:06 28:17 29:14 36:22 40:16 42:23 45:07 45:14 86:18 91:05 117:16 118:13 120:10 122:01 122:24 123:10 129:06 129:09 130:12 135:25 136:11 136:13 136:23 144:15 148:02 149:07 152:04 152:08 153:11 128 Counter-designation 157:12 160:02 160:07 160:11 164:22 169:11 170:05 172:09 172:25 173:03 175:07 175:20 176:13 180:09 181:14 187:07 189:13 159:02 160:05 160:08 161:07 165:10 169:25 171:13 172:23 173:01 173:16 175:18 176:08 177:05 180:22 183:11 189:10 191:01 199:07 199:15 201:06 204:13 206:04 206:12 208:22 209:05 211:09 222:01 230:21 235:02 235:14 235:19 249:03 254:01 199:13 201:03 201:13 205:25 206:06 206:13 208:24 210:14 212:08 223:11 234:08 235:10 235:17 239:05 251:06 256:01 256:03 294:25 305:15 307:15 256:10 295:04 306:02 309:08 Form (402, 403); Hearsay (801, 802); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Calls for expert testimony (701-703); Calls for speculation (602); Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Lack of personal knowledge (602); More prejudicial than probative (402, 403) Defendants’ Designations: 129 Start 124:05 138:22 141:07 150:15 156:09 173:17 191:02 201:14 213:10 217:05 228:18 239:16 240:19 243:02 256:11 End 125:03 140:05 141:11 150:18 157:03 173:25 191:21 203:10 213:20 217:11 230:01 240:04 241:07 244:09 256:16 Objection(s) Counter-designation Incomplete 150:20-21 Best Evidence Deponent: AMIT VIJAYVERGIYA Date of Deposition: June 17, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 13:06 22:08 26:02 58:18 62:21 65:04 67:19 69:07 85:03 94:20 163:20 166:21 177:22 209:14 230:19 236:16 243:19 260:02 289:15 End 13:12 23:24 26:20 59:17 64:22 67:12 68:22 70:08 85:12 118:07 165:11 167:24 187:03 230:03 232:13 238:16 246:10 260:07 290:13 Objection(s) 130 Counter-designation 290:21 293:05 294:09 297:03 303:05 292:02 293:24 294:23 297:16 303:17 Defendants’ Designations: Start 24:09 25:22 32:12 33:16 34:22 45:05 47:02 47:23 126:10 250:06 251:17 251:22 252:02 252:11 252:15 259:18 260:08 260:12 269:04 275:08 275:19 277:02 277:08 278:23 279:19 280:05 282:07 282:11 282:23 290:14 292:03 292:14 292:18 293:25 294:05 295:06 End 24:16 25:25 32:21 33:20 35:10 45:11 47:21 47:25 128:03 251:15 251:17 251:24 252:04 252:13 252:15 259:25 260:10 260:12 271:09 275:13 276:24 277:03 278:20 279:15 280:02 282:05 282:08 282:21 282:25 290:18 292:12 292:16 292:20 294:03 294:05 295:13 Objection(s) Compound; Form Assumes Facts Not in Evidence; Form Form (127:2-5); Best Evidence Form; leading Form Form Form Compound; Form Compound; Form; Vague/Ambiguous Form (278:17-20) Form Form Form Form Form Form 131 Counter-designation 24:17-22 25:12-16 295:15 295:17 297:17 300:02 300:15 302:14 302:20 303:18 305:10 305:21 307:06 309:05 309:17 310:15 310:19 317:16 319:11 321:22 324:15 327:14 333:10 333:20 335:18 337:06 338:04 338:09 338:25 339:20 350:19 351:11 352:07 352:21 353:08 353:16 353:22 354:14 357:17 295:15 296:16 297:19 300:11 300:19 302:17 303:04 305:08 305:19 306:03 307:15 309:15 309:25 310:17 313:24 318:09 321:20 321:24 325:06 327:19 333:14 335:14 336:25 337:13 338:07 338:21 339:07 340:13 351:08 351:15 352:10 353:05 353:14 353:18 354:08 354:24 358:12 300:12-13 Form Form Form; Hearsay Form; Hearsay Asked and Answered; Compound; Form Form Form Authentication; Foundation Authentication; Foundation Form; Speculation; Leading Deponent: AMIT VIJAYVERGIYA Date of Deposition: June 18, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: 132 325:7-19 Start 439:19 445:06 446:08 447:15 449:15 451:19 457:09 458:07 469:04 471:13 480:10 495:11 496:25 501:08 505:07 517:16 520:15 521:22 530:15 543:10 544:22 551:06 551:20 555:18 556:10 557:07 558:03 560:12 560:21 562:22 563:16 566:04 566:22 568:02 570:02 571:18 572:24 589:09 590:06 591:14 592:23 594:07 601:17 607:10 End 441:20 445:17 446:13 449:10 451:08 452:09 457:19 458:22 470:19 471:23 482:25 495:17 498:09 502:18 515:21 517:21 521:13 522:06 542:18 543:17 549:14 551:07 553:17 556:02 557:03 557:18 558:19 560:16 561:05 562:23 565:08 566:11 567:19 569:25 570:12 572:16 573:08 589:19 590:25 592:11 593:23 598:18 603:11 607:22 Objection(s) 133 Counter-designation 615:03 623:09 Defendants’ Designations: Start 442:02 442:06 442:13 455:05 455:11 455:20 456:19 456:23 474:08 474:12 553:22 554:07 603:12 603:25 604:06 End 442:04 442:11 442:19 455:09 455:18 456:02 456:21 457:08 474:10 474:12 554:05 554:09 603:14 604:03 604:06 Objection(s) Counter-designation Deponent: SYLVIE VILLORIA Date of Deposition: October 9, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 28:03 32:22 40:08 44:20 47:17 49:15 50:14 52:01 54:11 57:05 65:13 67:01 77:21 86:05 87:17 89:14 End 28:24 33:04 40:20 45:11 48:11 49:25 50:23 53:19 56:05 57:15 66:04 70:21 78:02 86:16 88:18 90:01 Objection(s) Argumentative. Asked and answered. Improper characterization of the facts. 134 Counter-designation 91:11 97:11 102:25 105:11 92:11 98:05 105:06 110:12 112:11 116:09 116:14 117:25 118:15 117:19 117:25 131:23 132:21 139:03 143:22 149:19 154:20 158:01 138:02 141:06 144:13 154:05 157:05 159:06 160:19 161:20 162:12 170:01 175:09 181:16 183:18 161:14 162:08 168:23 171:14 181:01 182:23 184:10 185:19 186:21 187:08 187:18 188:13 190:17 193:01 195:21 196:18 199:13 189:24 192:20 195:11 196:01 198:01 201:09 201:21 209:02 209:03 209:25 Improper characterization of the facts. Assumes facts not in evidence. Prejudicial. Improper characterization of the facts. Confuses the issues. Prejudicial. Improper characterization of the facts. Assumes facts not in evidence. Confuses the issues. Prejudicial. Calls for speculation. Foundation. Improper characterization of the facts. Misleading. Confuses the issues. Prejudicial. Improper characterization of the facts. Confuses the issues. Prejudicial. Improper characterization of the facts. Confuses the issues. Prejudicial. Improper characterization of the facts. Confuses the issues. Prejudicial. Argumentative. Mischaracterizes prior testimony. Improper characterization of the facts. Improper characterization of the facts. Confuses the issues. Improper characterization of the facts. Assumes facts not in evidence. Prejudicial. Improper characterization of the facts. 135 210:10 211:23 214:07 215:06 217:19 226:16 210:20 213:05 214:15 215:09 219:10 227:17 228:01 232:14 243:24 Confuses the issues. Lack of Foundation. 232:10 233:10 246:24 Improper characterization of the facts. Lack of foundation. Improper characterization of the facts. Confuses the issues. Defendants’ Designations: Start 29:20 30:06 95:08 96:11 End 29:25 32:21 95:16 97:10 111:11 112:10 Objection(s) Counter-designation Incomplete Non-Responsive (move to strike, 96:1119) Incomplete 94:15-21, 95:7 110:23-111:10 Deponent: STEPHEN WALL Date of Deposition: November 12, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 36:19 37:20 42:23 43:19 46:17 48:09 51:21 52:21 56:02 58:14 61:10 62:02 62:09 62:25 End 36:25 38:09 43:05 45:07 47:03 50:13 51:25 55:17 56:24 58:21 61:25 62:02 62:14 63:05 Objection(s) 136 Counter-designation 64:21 65:16 67:22 80:02 80:23 81:19 87:05 96:02 99:08 100:13 101:06 102:20 105:20 106:09 106:25 119:07 119:22 120:18 122:03 123:25 125:02 125:22 126:20 126:23 127:05 128:02 131:06 132:05 136:09 137:03 138:10 139:08 140:12 141:16 148:11 148:23 149:23 154:03 155:13 157:18 159:20 160:25 161:16 167:06 170:08 65:06 66:04 68:22 80:10 81:11 82:09 89:04 96:04 100:07 100:19 102:06 105:05 106:04 106:16 107:18 119:14 120:05 121:08 123:05 124:09 125:12 126:09 126:21 126:25 127:07 129:16 131:25 132:24 136:17 137:08 138:23 139:24 140:19 143:10 148:15 148:25 150:14 154:19 155:17 159:09 159:25 161:08 163:10 168:24 170:12 137 171:25 173:05 176:08 176:23 178:07 180:11 183:04 185:02 188:23 191:15 192:23 194:23 201:06 203:05 205:10 206:06 208:20 209:07 209:23 211:19 215:11 219:19 224:02 229:04 233:13 235:15 237:23 240:05 240:16 242:17 244:03 244:20 248:12 252:08 261:16 263:11 266:25 268:05 269:16 270:24 272:09 274:04 277:06 278:03 286:23 172:04 175:21 176:20 177:06 178:18 181:16 183:23 185:21 189:11 192:10 193:25 197:02 201:22 203:08 206:02 208:05 209:03 209:15 210:09 213:11 219:17 223:09 225:22 230:07 233:22 236:20 238:04 240:08 242:13 243:22 244:16 247:22 251:18 259:25 263:05 265:20 267:11 268:24 270:06 271:03 273:19 276:16 277:20 286:17 287:14 138 288:03 290:19 293:18 295:10 298:08 303:16 308:17 309:05 309:16 311:23 314:23 317:19 318:15 318:25 320:09 321:02 323:25 328:06 333:12 334:25 337:04 342:10 343:16 346:09 349:11 350:22 351:17 352:09 355:24 289:09 292:16 293:23 297:23 300:07 305:14 308:25 309:06 311:20 313:24 316:07 318:08 318:23 319:12 320:24 321:11 324:05 333:02 334:11 335:17 339:17 342:24 345:14 346:15 349:19 351:03 352:05 355:11 356:20 Defendants’ Designations: Start 39:04 40:25 46:09 46:15 51:02 55:18 56:25 58:23 69:06 81:12 96:05 100:20 End 40:09 42:22 46:11 46:16 51:03 55:25 57:11 59:20 69:12 81:18 96:11 101:05 Objection(s) Hearsay; Speculation Incomplete; Hearsay Counter-designation Incomplete 50:14-25 Hearsay Non-Responsive (move to strike) 139 40:16-24 118:13 119:15 120:06 121:09 121:22 123:06 124:10 129:17 133:02 137:21 139:02 119:06 119:21 120:17 121:15 122:02 123:22 124:25 129:22 133:08 138:08 139:07 139:25 140:20 140:11 141:06 143:12 143:17 148:04 155:18 169:20 172:05 182:12 183:24 148:07 155:25 170:07 173:04 183:03 184:25 185:22 206:03 208:06 209:16 185:24 206:05 208:19 209:22 228:21 230:08 238:05 266:19 277:21 292:17 309:02 318:09 321:22 339:18 342:25 345:15 229:03 230:25 238:06 266:24 278:02 292:17 309:04 318:14 322:10 340:04 343:15 345:20 Non-Responsive (move to strike) Speculation Speculation; Lack of Personal Knowledge Speculation; Lack of Personal Knowledge Non-Responsive (move to strike answer beginning with “I have no idea if that was actually fulfilled.”) Non-Responsive (move to strike answer beginning with “So it’s not just limited to the inquiry of this, is your question.” Speculation Speculation; Lack of Personal Knowledge Non-Responsive (move to strike) Non-Responsive (move to strike) Speculation Non-Responsive (move to strike) 140 355:12 355:23 Foundation (no question pending) Deponent: STEPHEN WALL Date of Deposition: November 13, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 379:02 386:10 390:08 391:05 396:07 412:08 416:25 419:21 421:08 422:16 430:11 432:24 448:11 451:03 454:10 456:12 464:13 469:03 470:02 470:18 472:06 472:17 473:06 513:03 549:03 559:05 560:08 563:09 573:12 592:18 597:20 619:09 626:11 629:19 630:07 End 381:21 387:22 390:23 393:02 396:20 416:16 418:06 419:25 421:14 422:23 431:18 433:15 448:25 453:24 455:04 456:17 464:22 469:13 470:10 470:24 472:11 472:25 473:15 514:25 549:20 559:25 560:11 563:15 573:18 592:21 597:25 620:12 629:12 629:25 633:20 Objection(s) 141 Counter-designation 634:13 638:06 Defendants’ Designations: Start 393:07 394:21 423:04 430:08 449:04 469:14 472:12 512:10 End 394:15 396:05 423:15 430:10 449:13 469:25 472:16 513:02 572:23 615:08 Objection(s) Counter-designation 573:11 616:17 Lack of Personal Knowledge Speculation; Lack of Personal Knowledge Deponent: SCOTT WATSON-BROWN Date of Deposition: June 24, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 9:13 10:11 14:11 15:17 16:07 19:17 20:14 22:10 23:12 23:22 24:07 24:23 25:15 26:08 29:04 35:20 37:10 38:23 39:13 41:06 End 9:25 10:22 14:21 15:24 16:13 20:04 22:05 22:13 23:18 23:25 24:11 25:07 25:20 28:06 32:08 36:16 37:18 39:06 39:17 41:23 Objection(s) Lack of foundation (402, 403) Lack of foundation (402, 403) Lack of foundation (402, 403) 142 Counter-designation 42:09 43:12 44:06 45:11 46:02 47:04 56:18 58:11 68:03 69:14 72:23 76:06 78:07 79:10 82:11 91:16 92:07 94:25 42:22 43:21 44:14 45:21 46:05 52:15 57:19 58:14 69:05 70:06 73:23 76:25 78:18 79:24 83:08 91:21 93:03 95:19 105:05 105:15 111:02 111:21 111:23 113:05 116:11 118:05 118:25 120:21 124:19 126:21 127:05 128:12 131:16 132:20 133:03 133:14 136:17 138:18 139:08 140:04 140:11 144:06 154:19 155:02 111:23 114:17 117:18 118:08 119:07 122:02 124:23 126:25 127:12 129:18 132:04 132:22 133:05 135:20 137:19 138:21 139:19 140:09 141:22 144:20 154:24 155:03 Leading (611) Leading (611) Lack of foundation (602); Leading (611) Lack of foundation (602) Lack of foundation (602) Relevance (402, 403) Hearsay (801, 802) Hearsay (801, 802) Leading Relevance (402, 403) Relevance (402, 403); Hearsay (801, 802) Relevance (402, 403); Hearsay (801, 802) Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602) Relevance (402, 403) Lack of foundation (602) Lack of foundation (602) Relevance (402, 403) Hearsay (801, 802) Calls for speculation (602) 143 158:13 159:22 161:08 169:04 182:22 196:22 159:07 160:18 161:24 169:08 183:06 200:04 212:19 217:14 219:21 223:14 225:08 227:02 229:04 229:10 229:21 241:15 243:19 213:02 219:10 223:11 223:16 225:11 228:02 229:05 229:12 232:06 242:12 244:13 246:08 251:02 253:03 255:24 256:22 257:14 258:22 259:20 249:18 251:14 253:05 256:10 257:07 258:06 259:13 260:10 260:25 261:04 261:18 264:25 263:05 265:09 271:08 271:16 273:25 276:12 275:10 277:11 278:19 279:15 284:11 285:05 285:07 284:25 285:05 285:11 285:13 285:17 Relevance (402, 403); Leading (611); Lack of foundation (602) Lack of foundation (602) Relevance (402, 403); Leading (611) Relevance (402, 403) Hearsay (801, 802) Hearsay (801, 802) Hearsay (801, 802) Form (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602) Leading (611) Relevance (402, 403) Lack of foundation (602) Lack of foundation (602) Lack of foundation (602) Relevance (402, 403); Hearsay (801, 802) Hearsay (801, 802); Relevance (402, 403) Relevance (402, 403) Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (402, 403) Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Misleading (402, 403) Hearsay (801, 802) Lack of foundation (602); Hearsay (801, 802); Relevance (402, 403) Hearsay (801, 802); Designates attorney colloquy (402, 403) Assumes facts not in evidence (602) Assumes facts not in evidence (602); Lack of foundation (602) 144 292:11 293:03 Relevance (402, 403); Lack of foundation (602); Assumes facts not in evidence (602) Defendants’ Designations: Start 10:02 13:11 15:05 16:14 22:14 25:12 28:20 34:09 36:17 50:19 56:12 58:15 60:24 63:05 64:18 65:21 73:24 80:14 81:04 93:04 99:17 109:05 115:03 116:02 122:03 125:23 135:21 141:23 144:22 145:03 146:19 148:14 148:23 149:21 152:10 165:22 182:07 192:04 End 10:10 13:25 15:08 16:22 23:05 25:14 29:03 35:19 37:02 50:25 56:17 59:17 61:25 63:23 64:21 66:05 74:04 80:22 81:08 93:13 99:22 109:09 155:11 116:10 122:18 126:14 135:25 142:17 145:11 145:18 148:12 148:19 148:25 149:25 152:25 165:25 182:21 192:19 Objection(s) Counter-designation Leading Speculation; Leading Compound Foundation (145:8-11) Foundation (145:8-11) Form (146:19-22, 147:3-6, 148:3-5) Speculation; Form Compound Incomplete 145 152:8-9 193:07 219:11 269:23 277:12 287:02 194:19 219:19 270:17 277:21 288:08 194:20-195:8 (cut objection at 219:17) Deponent: LAURENCE WIENER Date of Deposition: July 26, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 6:17 8:06 10:08 16:09 18:17 19:04 20:03 21:09 25:08 31:05 33:20 34:23 38:07 40:25 44:24 47:14 49:22 51:03 51:08 56:22 59:02 59:21 62:04 63:14 64:18 67:02 71:23 74:10 75:20 79:19 94:06 End 6:19 8:11 10:24 18:11 18:24 19:21 21:05 23:21 27:11 31:18 34:17 36:04 39:02 43:20 45:15 49:18 49:25 51:06 53:21 58:09 59:20 61:14 62:09 64:02 65:15 67:17 72:22 75:06 76:07 80:11 95:12 Objection(s) 146 Counter-designation 126:17 127:16 138:12 149:10 173:23 184:03 269:21 126:25 128:16 138:23 149:25 174:02 184:11 270:18 Defendants’ Designations: Start 69:16 82:04 End 70:07 82:13 83:07 84:06 87:07 88:18 98:16 111:04 121:08 271:02 271:22 272:02 276:21 294:18 295:03 296:05 297:02 297:21 Objection(s) Form (70:3-4) Non-Responsive, no question pending (move to strike 82:10-13) Non-Responsive (move to strike 84:5 beginning with “No” through 84:6) Counter-designation 87:11 89:13 99:11 111:10 121:10 271:20 271:24 272:11 277:06 294:22 295:22 296:09 297:10 297:25 Deponent: MICHAEL WIND Date of Deposition: June 22, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 7:20 10:21 11:07 14:03 17:06 18:15 End 8:17 10:23 11:19 14:25 17:18 19:04 Objection(s) 147 Counter-designation 19:25 21:23 22:23 25:12 27:16 31:13 34:08 35:20 36:14 47:06 48:06 50:17 52:11 52:20 59:03 60:03 60:24 62:19 82:07 93:20 112:03 158:16 174:10 202:06 208:11 210:06 215:14 266:03 288:09 292:03 298:17 298:25 311:04 20:18 22:14 23:03 25:22 28:06 31:20 34:24 36:10 37:06 47:24 48:19 51:07 52:15 53:05 59:06 60:12 61:10 64:04 82:20 94:07 112:11 158:25 174:25 203:03 208:19 210:16 215:25 266:16 289:11 292:20 298:24 299:12 311:25 Defendants’ Designations: Start 90:10 103:19 106:07 150:10 164:04 166:07 166:18 170:17 End 91:03 105:02 107:15 150:20 165:21 166:14 167:11 171:11 Objection(s) 148 Counter-designation 173:20 193:03 266:17 267:04 268:23 271:10 273:02 276:07 278:15 295:03 173:24 193:12 266:21 268:15 269:23 272:18 273:15 276:16 279:10 295:14 Speculation (move to strike: 271:20-25) Mischaracterizes prior witness testimony Deponent: SELENE WOO Date of Deposition: December 17, 2012 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 30:17 37:17 37:24 41:18 44:09 49:21 51:14 55:02 63:18 68:14 70:02 74:22 78:11 86:08 93:24 95:06 101:24 103:15 110:02 119:10 122:06 126:02 154:17 155:23 158:17 163:20 End 30:22 37:20 38:09 43:10 45:13 50:8 53:02 55:20 63:25 69:24 72:24 76:19 79:18 86:21 94:07 95:15 102:14 104:02 112:06 120:09 122:23 128:13 155:22 156:24 159:16 164:15 Objection(s) 149 Counter-designation 175:06 181:03 187:17 190:19 197:24 200:05 207:10 210:08 211:13 212:13 214:07 214:22 218:21 222:13 234:02 237:08 268:23 270:16 276:02 288:10 290:12 292:14 295:12 303:02 306:02 308:10 175:21 181:21 188:21 190:25 198:21 200:20 207:20 210:20 211:19 212:19 214:21 216:15 220:02 222:24 235:04 238:18 269:24 271:18 278:08 289:10 291:15 293:11 300:03 304:24 306:17 310:24 Defendants’ Designations: Start 29:22 43:11 45:14 53:03 60:20 62:08 63:11 86:22 94:08 172:13 191:02 191:12 206:19 208:04 209:02 End 30:16 44:08 47:20 54:25 62:03 62:13 63:17 86:24 95:05 174:4 191:06 191:16 207:02 208:19 209:18 Objection(s) (cut objection at 46:13-14) (cut objection 172:20-21, 173:9, 173:23) 150 Counter-designation 213:06 217:07 221:08 236:08 271:19 289:11 306:18 307:22 214:06 217:13 222:12 237:07 271:23 289:24 307:02 307:02 (cut objection 217:9) add 217:6 Speculation Speculation Deponent: NANCY ZHANG Date of Deposition: January 30, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 27:25 30:09 41:19 45:18 154:07 164:19 252:07 325:20 333:18 338:14 339:09 340:16 342:16 345:24 347:03 348:15 349:17 350:10 352:03 354:07 358:11 359:20 361:25 End 28:17 30:12 44:03 46:07 154:14 165:14 253:08 326:07 334:15 338:21 340:09 342:07 344:14 346:18 347:14 349:06 350:04 350:19 354:05 357:23 359:16 361:04 362:19 Objection(s) Counter-designation Objection(s) Counter-designation Defendants’ Designations: Start End 151 14:16 23:02 25:02 26:02 29:16 30:13 33:14 35:16 39:13 46:17 50:03 14:25 23:13 25:20 27:24 29:24 30:22 33:18 35:21 39:17 47:15 50:20 51:13 51:14 52:13 69:04 71:23 80:02 52:22 69:12 72:19 81:10 97:21 99:11 100:06 98:12 99:21 102:17 102:24 103:06 104:06 107:20 104:15 109:06 111:12 116:08 119:06 121:10 126:02 127:16 136:20 111:23 116:19 120:22 121:22 126:15 128:10 137:20 140:08 142:05 144:03 146:06 148:14 157:14 158:16 141:18 143:09 144:07 146:23 148:18 157:21 161:05 Form, leading, foundation, vague/ambiguous Form, leading, foundation, vague/ambiguous Speculation; lack of personal knowledge Form, compound, vague-ambiguous, speculation (80:2-24); speculation (81:810) Speculation Form, speculation, foundation (100:621) Form, speculation, lack of personal knowledge Form, speculation, foundation, lack of personal knowledge Speculation, foundation Form, foundation, speculation Incomplete Form, foundation, no personal knowledge; if objections overruled, add 137:21-25 Foundation, speculation Incomplete Speculation, foundation Speculation (159:21-160:11), no 152 128:11-129:16 143:10-144:2 163:11 167:22 164:12 172:08 172:20 177:06 172:24 177:10 183:20 184:19 189:08 190:10 191:03 189:19 190:19 191:20 192:18 199:09 199:18 201:16 208:17 201:02 201:20 212:10 213:19 217:15 219:18 224:20 226:07 227:13 229:16 232:25 236:03 238:10 238:23 240:06 243:14 247:11 249:08 251:04 253:11 257:17 261:09 271:06 331:16 222:12 225:18 226:16 228:22 232:19 234:19 237:02 238:14 239:22 242:23 243:19 247:22 250:22 251:12 253:16 258:18 261:14 271:13 333:08 334:16 340:10 personal knowledge Form, foundation, leading, speculation Speculation; no personal knowledge; incomplete – if objections overruled, add 167:16-21; form, leading, foundation (170:6-22) 334:24 340:15 Form, foundation, speculation, relevance, 403 Form, foundation, vague/ambiguous, compound, leading (184:11-19) Foundation, 403 Lacks personal knowledge, speculation (191:17-20) Form, foundation, speculation, no personal knowledge, leading Foundation, no personal knowledge Speculation, no personal knowledge, foundation Form, speculation, no personal knowledge, foundation Best evidence, foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation; form, leading Best evidence, form, misstates evidence Form, misstates evidence Form, leading, speculation, vague 403 Form, speculation, foundation Duplicative Foundation, 403 Form, calls for expert conclusion, leading 153 201:3-12 346:19 347:15 349:07 350:05 367:21 368:24 347:02 347:21 349:16 350:09 368:14 369:20 Deponent: JEAN BERTIN Date of Deposition: November 9, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 07:05 10:16 11:06 12:04 18:07 21:05 21:09 21:10 21:25 42:16 53:17 54:17 61:13 65:19 70:13 72:20 77:16 78:05 78:10 79:06 85:21 98:10 100:02 117:07 117:10 119:05 123:21 127:13 128:22 128:25 131:17 End 07:08 10:18 11:25 12:23 18:15 21:06 21:09 21:12 22:09 42:21 54:04 54:18 61:23 66:16 70:17 72:23 77:25 78:06 78:24 79:14 86:02 98:13 100:11 117:08 117:10 119:08 123:24 127:16 128:23 129:18 131:23 Objection(s) 154 Counter-designation 131:24 144:10 144:21 163:20 164:02 173:18 174:08 176:17 176:24 185:04 185:20 186:03 186:17 187:18 187:24 187:25 188:07 189:05 132:18 144:15 144:25 163:25 164:13 174:07 174:19 176:19 177:06 185:17 185:23 186:14 186:20 187:20 187:24 188:04 188:10 189:12 Defendants’ Designations: Start 12:02 13:11 14:02 15:02 16:02 17:02 18:02 80:13 119:09 120:02 121:17 122:02 122:21 123:02 123:07 124:04 125:02 126:02 127:02 127:17 128:02 128:13 End 12:03 13:25 14:25 15:25 16:25 17:25 18:06 80:18 119:25 120:08 121:25 122:13 122:25 123:02 123:13 124:25 125:25 126:25 127:12 127:25 128:08 128:21 Objection(s) No question pending; Incomplete Relevance 155 Counter-designation 11:24-25 129:24 130:02 171:06 173:13 177:07 178:02 179:02 180:02 190:08 129:25 130:10 171:18 173:17 177:25 178:25 179:12 180:18 190:15 Form Form Speculation (move to strike) Deponent: RASMUS BESSING Date of Deposition: November 15, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 07:01 07:17 09:16 10:14 12:23 16:06 34:25 38:11 38:21 40:20 48:10 48:16 49:19 56:02 56:05 70:07 72:15 73:02 80:03 80:08 84:15 90:24 91:05 117:18 131:24 156:17 156:24 163:16 End 07:05 07:19 09:24 10:19 13:10 16:09 35:22 38:13 39:06 42:12 48:14 49:09 50:10 56:03 56:08 70:14 72:25 73:19 80:06 80:18 84:22 91:03 92:02 118:21 132:07 156:21 157:10 164:06 Objection(s) 156 Counter-designation 170:04 171:03 171:08 173:16 173:19 174:04 205:18 207:05 207:10 207:15 208:07 210:08 211:04 214:21 216:12 217:09 217:17 222:22 223:06 230:14 233:06 233:14 279:23 280:03 170:08 171:05 171:12 173:18 173:21 175:05 206:05 207:09 207:13 207:19 209:11 210:14 211:11 215:05 216:22 217:15 218:05 223:04 223:12 230:20 233:12 233:21 279:24 280:14 Defendants’ Designations: Start 7:20 10:20 11:16 15:10 22:17 28:17 29:09 31:02 31:08 32:17 33:02 37:09 End 7:23 10:23 12:04 15:12 23:02 28:19 29:19 31:03 32:06 32:24 34:24 37:20 37:25 42:18 46:17 38:06 43:20 48:09 Objection(s) Beyond the scope of 30(b)(6) Beyond the scope of 30(b)(6) Beyond the scope of 30(b)(6) Beyond the scope of 30(b)(6) Compound; Relevance; Beyond the scope of 30(b)(6) Relevance; Beyond the scope of 30(b)(6) Relevance; Beyond the scope of 30(b)(6) Form 157 Counter-designation 51:03 52:16 54:19 59:05 65:07 66:03 69:06 70:22 74:04 74:10 75:15 76:07 82:17 83:23 85:21 88:24 89:06 90:16 100:19 101:16 101:20 104:05 104:20 114:16 122:21 129:14 52:14 53:16 55:25 60:07 65:10 66:23 70:06 71:21 74:08 75:13 76:04 76:22 83:18 84:11 86:03 89:04 90:14 90:23 100:20 101:18 103:24 104:14 106:13 115:04 123:13 130:03 131:20 132:08 134:05 134:23 140:21 169:23 171:06 172:23 178:21 179:03 193:12 194:18 211:12 213:20 215:06 215:19 222:06 230:24 131:23 133:06 134:21 134:25 141:05 169:25 171:07 173:15 178:25 180:13 193:21 195:05 212:04 213:25 215:08 216:11 222:21 232:02 Form Form Relevance Form Form Form Form Form Form Incomplete Form Relevance; Beyond the Scope of 30(b0(6) Form; Asked and Answered Form Form Form; Foundation Form; Foundation 158 114:10-15 232:21 236:21 237:14 240:07 240:12 233:04 236:24 237:24 240:10 240:24 Form Form Form; Compound Form Deponent: TERENCE C. SULLIVAN Date of Deposition: December 21, 2011 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start 21:12 22:12 24:06 29:17 30:13 32:02 37:17 61:15 69:03 70:24 77:04 77:10 99:03 114:13 121:06 130:22 142:16 146:03 168:25 175:21 274:12 274:23 276:09 281:06 294:14 294:19 304:07 304:13 End 21:16 22:14 24:13 30:12 30:15 32:15 38:05 61:19 69:09 71:10 77:07 77:14 99:08 114:24 121:20 131:04 142:18 146:11 169:03 176:02 274:22 275:06 276:21 281:11 294:17 294:22 304:11 304:15 Objection(s) Defendants’ Designations: 159 Counter-designation Start 38:06 73:06 91:06 92:16 93:18 95:15 100:06 101:07 102:04 104:23 105:02 End 38:19 73:18 91:20 92:24 93:23 95:23 100:15 101:24 102:10 104:25 102:12 108:09 113:16 114:02 124:16 125:02 126:02 127:02 128:03 129:14 129:22 130:02 130:08 132:12 132:25 136:18 136:22 140:12 148:25 178:03 179:02 108:19 113:25 114:10 124:25 125:25 126:25 127:20 128:08 129:16 129:25 130:04 130:21 132:15 133:09 136:20 136:23 142:03 150:25 178:25 181:03 272:17 273:05 273:12 273:17 274:03 275:18 276:02 277:25 285:02 272:20 273:09 273:15 273:23 274:11 275:25 276:08 278:10 285:17 287:14 Objection(s) 288:24 Counter-designation Compound Foundation; Form Form; Foundation Hearsay; Form Hearsay; Form (Incorrect designation - ending at 105:12?) Form Form; Foundation Form Hearsay Hearsay Hearsay Hearsay Form Beyond Scope of 30(b)(6) Beyond Scope of 30(b)(6) Form; Beyond Scope of 30(b)(6) Form; Hearsay Form Question stricken by counsel (179:8-9); Best Evidence; Form From; Compound Form; Relevance; FRE 403 (more prejudicial than probative) 160 130:5-7 289:02 293:24 296:03 303:16 304:17 305:02 289:02 294:13 296:11 304:06 304:22 306:10 Form; Foundation Deponent: ROBERTO CIOCI Date of Deposition: September 27, 2011 Defendants’ Designations: Start 35:20 63:04 66:06 66:20 113:04 165:12 194:13 321:25 327:05 331:04 332:02 334:12 335:20 337:04 337:18 338:10 341:09 343:15 355:05 End 36:03 63:10 66:11 68:08 114:24 166:17 195:13 322:05 327:21 331:22 332:05 335:14 335:24 337:09 337:23 338:16 341:22 343:24 355:10 Objection(s) Counter-designation (cut objection at 67:14) Compound Deponent: WILLIAM A. DeROSA Date of Deposition: FEBRUARY 7, 2013 Plaintiffs’ Designations: Start End Objection(s) 161 Counter-designation 11:13 12:07 19:24 21:09 22:08 22:19 25:02 29:22 30:25 31:21 33:22 36:15 38:23 44:13 45:02 53:24 54:03 65:08 65:11 65:19 75:11 76:05 235:04 235:22 240:19 11:18 12:16 20:08 21:12 22:18 22:23 25:06 29:25 31:20 31:24 33:25 36:20 39:05 44:25 45:07 53:25 54:05 65:09 65:17 65:21 75:20 76:15 235:21 236:19 240:22 Defendants’ Designations: Start 10:02 12:17 14:19 15:10 17:12 17:19 18:18 19:17 20:23 22:02 25:12 25:19 25:24 27:02 29:06 End 11:03 13:12 14:23 15:14 17:15 17:24 18:20 19:19 21:08 22:07 25:16 25:21 26:22 28:02 29:10 Objection(s) Counter-designation 11:4 21:9-12 162 37:08 53:15 225:16 231:25 237:12 240:23 242:18 244:16 38:12 53:23 225:19 234:16 238:02 241:17 243:12 245:09 Form; Foundation 163

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?