Molchatsky et al v. United States Of America

Filing 17

NOTICE of Supplemental Authority re: 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.. Document filed by United States Of America. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Authority)(Ehrlich, Jeffrey)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––x : PHYLLIS MOLCHATSKY and : STEVEN SCHNEIDER, M.D., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : Defendant. : : ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––x 09 CIV 8697 (LTS/AJP) NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY The United States respectfully submits, in further support of its motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, the attached pertinent and significant authority rendered since the United States filed its reply brief. On April 20, 2010, the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued its decision in Dichter-Mad Family Partners, LLP v. United States, CV-09-9061 SVW (FMOx). That case, like this one, was brought by investors in Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi scheme who alleged that the SEC negligently failed to detect and disclose Madoff’s wrongdoing. The court granted the United States’ motion to dismiss based on the discretionary function exception. Respectfully submitted, PREET BHARARA United States Attorney Southern District of New York TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General PHYLLIS J. PYLES Director, Torts Branch s/ Sarah S. Normand SARAH S. NORMAND NEIL M. CORWIN Assistant United States Attorneys Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street, Third Floor New York, NY 10007 212-637-2709 sarah.normand@usdoj.gov neil.corwin@usdoj.gov MARY M. LEACH Assistant Director, Torts Branch s/ Jeffrey Paul Ehrlich JEFFREY PAUL EHRLICH Trial Attorney, Torts Branch Department of Justice Benjamin Franklin Station P.O. Box 888 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-353-2574 jeff.ehrlich@usdoj.gov 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?