Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al

Filing 669

FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - MOTION to Amend/Correct Submitting Proposed Amended Consent Decree Pursuant to Court Order of October 27, 2016. Document filed by The City Of New York. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Amended Consent Decree)(Scheiner, Alan) Modified on 11/22/2016 (ldi).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X ADRIAN SCHOOLCRAFT, Plaintiff, AMENDED CONSENT DECREE -against10-CV-6005 (RWS) JAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, DR. ISAK ISAKOV, Individually and in his Official Capacity, DR. LILIAN ALDANABERNIER, Individually and in his Official Capacity and JAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER EMPLOYEE’S “JOHN DOE” # 150, Individually and in their Official Capacity (the name John Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown), Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT: 1. It is judicially determined that the records of the involuntary admission of Adrian Schoolcraft at Jamaica Hospital Medical Center from October 31, 2009 to November 6, 2009 are hereby expunged and sealed, and it is judicially determined that the involuntary admission of Adrian Schoolcraft at Jamaica Hospital is a nullity and cannot be used to restrict or limit his civil rights. 2. This Order is binding solely upon the plaintiff and Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Dr. Isak Isakov, and Dr. Lilian Adana-Bernier, and the rights and obligations of any other parties to this action, or any other persons, are unaffected by this Order. Dated: New York, New York. __________________ SO ORDERED: _______________________________ Honorable Robert W. Sweet United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?