Unites States v. Pokerstars, et al
Filing
299
DECLARATION of AUSA Jason H. Cowley in Support re: 203 MOTION to Strike Document No. 62 (Claim of Cardroom International).. Document filed by United States Of America. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Cowley, Jason)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
X
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
- v. -
11 Civ. 2564 (KMW)
POKERSTARS, et al.
Defendants;
ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST IN
THE ASSETS OF POKERSTARS, et al.;
Defendants-in-rem.
-----------------X
DECLARATION OF JASON H. COWLEY
JASON H. COWLEY, pursuant to the provisions of 28
U.S.C.
ยง
1746, declares as follows:
1.
I am an Assistant United States Attorney in the
office of Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern
District of New York.
I am one of the Assistant United States
Attorneys responsible for representing the Government in the
above-referenced case.
I respectfully submit this declaration in
connection with the Government's response to the sur-reply filed
by Cardroom International, LLC ("Cardroom") relating to the
Government's motion to strike its claim.
2.
Attached hereto as Exhibit A is what I believe to
be a true and correct copy of an order entered on or about
December 31, 2012, in the case Cardroom International LLC v. Mark
Scheinberg, et al., No. SC114330 (Super. Ct. Cal. L.A. County).
3.
Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct
copy of the stipulation entered between the Government and
Cardroom on or about July 27, 2012, relating to the Government's
maintenance of substitute res in regard to Cardroom's pending
claim in this action.
4.
Attached hereto as Exhibit C are true and correct
copies of two letters sent to the Court by the Government
regarding several Stipulated Orders of Settlement that have been
entered in this action.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing
is true and correct.
Dated:
New York, New York
January 14, 2013
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?