Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al

Filing 112

DECLARATION of David J. Sheehan in Opposition re: 80 MOTION to Strike THE EXPERT REPORTS AND TESTIMONY OF STEVE POMERANTZ AND HARRISON J. GOLDIN.. Document filed by Irving H. Picard. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-1, # 2 Exhibit 1-2, # 3 Exhibit 1-3, # 4 Exhibit 1-4, # 5 Exhibit 1-5, # 6 Exhibit 1-6, # 7 Exhibit 2, # 8 Exhibit 3)(Sheehan, David)

Download PDF
Exhibit 3 1 1 C O N F I D E N T I A L 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 11-CV-03605(JSR)(HBP) 3 4 5 --------------------------------x 6 IRVING H. PICARD, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, 7 8 Videotaped Deposition of: Plaintiff, v. DR. STEVE POMERANTZ 9 SAUL B. KATZ, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 --------------------------------x 12 13 14 15 TRANSCRIPT of testimony as taken by and before 16 NANCY C. BENDISH, Certified Court Reporter, RMR, CRR 17 and Notary Public of the States of New York and New 18 Jersey, at the offices of Davis, Polk & Wardwell, 19 450 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York on Sunday, 20 January 8, 2012, commencing at 9:27 a.m. 21 22 23 24 25 PICARD v. KATZ, et al. CONFIDENTIAL STEVE POMERANTZ 1/8/12 134 1 2 knows. Q. And the same would be true with 3 Mr. Wilpon; other than whatever went on with BLMIS, 4 you don't know that he has any other experience with 5 stock brokerage accounts? 6 A. Well, I mean, there's an affiliation 7 with Sterling Stamos, and there's certainly a lot of 8 knowledge that is presented to general partners of 9 an entity like that. 10 11 So, there's plenty of experience with those types of things. Q. Do you know what Mr. Wilpon's 12 connection to Sterling Stamos was, other than being 13 named a general partner? 14 15 16 17 18 A. Q. A. I believe he was a general partner. Right. Other than that? Other than what Sterling Stamos offers his contribution to be, I don't know. Q. Do you know whether he ever attended 19 any of the investment management meetings at 20 Sterling Stamos? 21 A. 22 23 24 25 Q. I don't know. Do you know whether he ever purported to pick investments at Sterling Stamos? A. Q. I don't know. How about Mr. Friedman, do you know BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193 PICARD v. KATZ, et al. CONFIDENTIAL STEVE POMERANTZ 1/8/12 177 1 Q. You don't know whether in the United 2 States people are free to invest their own money as 3 they wish? 4 5 MR. KORNFELD: A. Object to form. That's not what I'm saying. There's 6 a lot of information that is disclosed as part of 7 the investment management industry. 8 prospectus, there are annual reports, there are 9 confirmations. There is a If people were free to completely 10 ignore everything, then there would be no reason to 11 disclose any of this information. 12 being disclosed is because it then imparts a 13 responsibility to an investor to understand and have 14 some basis for what's going on. 15 completely free to ignore everything and -- and then 16 not have some legal consequence to it. 17 Q. The reason it's You're not And the opinions that you've rendered 18 in here are based upon the understanding that you've 19 just testified to? 20 21 22 23 MR. KORNFELD: A. Q. A. Object to form. That's not what I said. Well, are they? No. I said that -- I've said that I 24 view these defendants as sophisticated investors, 25 for reasons that I cite, mainly that I see them as BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193 PICARD v. KATZ, et al. CONFIDENTIAL STEVE POMERANTZ 1/8/12 178 1 having the indicia of sophisticated investors. 2 I furthermore think that as a result of that 3 sophistication, there are expectations. 4 Q. 5 A. 6 Q. And Expectations by whom? The court. So you think the law imposes an 7 expectation that investors will investigate their 8 investments? 9 MR. KORNFELD: 10 A. Object to form. That's not what I said. I said that 11 they have indicia of sophisticated investors and the 12 court will react to that as it sees fit. 13 14 Q. All right. Let's look at some of the other things you say here. 15 You refer throughout your opinion to 16 "Sterling," and I think if we go back to page, page 17 7 of your report, the bottom line in the text. 18 say, "similarly situated to Sterling Equities." 19 A. 20 Q. You Yes. And then there's a parenthetical and 21 it says, quote, "Sterling," close quote; do you see 22 that? 23 24 25 A. Q. Yes. So, I understand that you're adopting the term "Sterling" to mean Sterling Equities; is BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?