Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al
Filing
112
DECLARATION of David J. Sheehan in Opposition re: 80 MOTION to Strike THE EXPERT REPORTS AND TESTIMONY OF STEVE POMERANTZ AND HARRISON J. GOLDIN.. Document filed by Irving H. Picard. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-1, # 2 Exhibit 1-2, # 3 Exhibit 1-3, # 4 Exhibit 1-4, # 5 Exhibit 1-5, # 6 Exhibit 1-6, # 7 Exhibit 2, # 8 Exhibit 3)(Sheehan, David)
Exhibit 3
1
1
C O N F I D E N T I A L
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
11-CV-03605(JSR)(HBP)
3
4
5
--------------------------------x
6
IRVING H. PICARD, Trustee for
the Liquidation of Bernard L.
Madoff Investment Securities LLC,
7
8
Videotaped
Deposition of:
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. STEVE
POMERANTZ
9
SAUL B. KATZ, et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
--------------------------------x
12
13
14
15
TRANSCRIPT of testimony as taken by and before
16
NANCY C. BENDISH, Certified Court Reporter, RMR, CRR
17
and Notary Public of the States of New York and New
18
Jersey, at the offices of Davis, Polk & Wardwell,
19
450 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York on Sunday,
20
January 8, 2012, commencing at 9:27 a.m.
21
22
23
24
25
PICARD v. KATZ, et al.
CONFIDENTIAL
STEVE POMERANTZ 1/8/12
134
1
2
knows.
Q.
And the same would be true with
3
Mr. Wilpon; other than whatever went on with BLMIS,
4
you don't know that he has any other experience with
5
stock brokerage accounts?
6
A.
Well, I mean, there's an affiliation
7
with Sterling Stamos, and there's certainly a lot of
8
knowledge that is presented to general partners of
9
an entity like that.
10
11
So, there's plenty of
experience with those types of things.
Q.
Do you know what Mr. Wilpon's
12
connection to Sterling Stamos was, other than being
13
named a general partner?
14
15
16
17
18
A.
Q.
A.
I believe he was a general partner.
Right.
Other than that?
Other than what Sterling Stamos
offers his contribution to be, I don't know.
Q.
Do you know whether he ever attended
19
any of the investment management meetings at
20
Sterling Stamos?
21
A.
22
23
24
25
Q.
I don't know.
Do you know whether he ever purported
to pick investments at Sterling Stamos?
A.
Q.
I don't know.
How about Mr. Friedman, do you know
BENDISH REPORTING, INC.
877.404.2193
PICARD v. KATZ, et al.
CONFIDENTIAL
STEVE POMERANTZ 1/8/12
177
1
Q.
You don't know whether in the United
2
States people are free to invest their own money as
3
they wish?
4
5
MR. KORNFELD:
A.
Object to form.
That's not what I'm saying.
There's
6
a lot of information that is disclosed as part of
7
the investment management industry.
8
prospectus, there are annual reports, there are
9
confirmations.
There is a
If people were free to completely
10
ignore everything, then there would be no reason to
11
disclose any of this information.
12
being disclosed is because it then imparts a
13
responsibility to an investor to understand and have
14
some basis for what's going on.
15
completely free to ignore everything and -- and then
16
not have some legal consequence to it.
17
Q.
The reason it's
You're not
And the opinions that you've rendered
18
in here are based upon the understanding that you've
19
just testified to?
20
21
22
23
MR. KORNFELD:
A.
Q.
A.
Object to form.
That's not what I said.
Well, are they?
No.
I said that -- I've said that I
24
view these defendants as sophisticated investors,
25
for reasons that I cite, mainly that I see them as
BENDISH REPORTING, INC.
877.404.2193
PICARD v. KATZ, et al.
CONFIDENTIAL
STEVE POMERANTZ 1/8/12
178
1
having the indicia of sophisticated investors.
2
I furthermore think that as a result of that
3
sophistication, there are expectations.
4
Q.
5
A.
6
Q.
And
Expectations by whom?
The court.
So you think the law imposes an
7
expectation that investors will investigate their
8
investments?
9
MR. KORNFELD:
10
A.
Object to form.
That's not what I said.
I said that
11
they have indicia of sophisticated investors and the
12
court will react to that as it sees fit.
13
14
Q.
All right.
Let's look at some of the
other things you say here.
15
You refer throughout your opinion to
16
"Sterling," and I think if we go back to page, page
17
7 of your report, the bottom line in the text.
18
say, "similarly situated to Sterling Equities."
19
A.
20
Q.
You
Yes.
And then there's a parenthetical and
21
it says, quote, "Sterling," close quote; do you see
22
that?
23
24
25
A.
Q.
Yes.
So, I understand that you're adopting
the term "Sterling" to mean Sterling Equities; is
BENDISH REPORTING, INC.
877.404.2193
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?