Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al
Filing
151
DECLARATION of David J. Sheehan in Support re: 150 SECOND MOTION in Limine To Exclude All Evidence And Arguments Relating To The Inaction And/Or Failures Of The United States Securities And Exchange Commission.. Document filed by Irving H. Picard. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Sheehan, David)
Exhibit 1
1
1
C O N F I D E N T I A L
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
11-CV-03605(JSR)(HBP)
3
4
5
--------------------------------x
6
IRVING H. PICARD, Trustee for
the Liquidation of Bernard L.
Madoff Investment Securities LLC,
7
8
Videotaped
Deposition of:
Plaintiff,
v.
SAUL B. KATZ
9
SAUL B. KATZ, et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
--------------------------------x
12
13
14
15
TRANSCRIPT of testimony as taken by and before
16
NANCY C. BENDISH, Certified Court Reporter, RMR, CRR
17
and Notary Public of the States of New York and New
18
Jersey, at the offices of Baker & Hostetler, 45
19
Rockefeller Plaza, New York, New York on Friday,
20
January 13, 2012, commencing at
21
22
23
24
25
9:32 a.m.
PICARD v. KATZ, et al.
CONFIDENTIAL
SAUL B. KATZ 1/13/12
2
1
A P P E A R A N C E S:
2
3
4
5
BAKER & HOSTETLER, LLP
45 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, New York 10111
BY: DAVID J. SHEEHAN, ESQ.
KATHRYN M. ZUNNO, ESQ.
For Plaintiff, Irving Picard, Trustee
6
7
8
9
10
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL, LLP
450 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10017
BY: ROBERT F. WISE, JR., ESQ.
KAREN E. WAGNER, ESQ.
DANA M. SESHENS, ESQ.
ROBERT B. FISKE, JR., ESQ.
For Sterling Equities, certain
affiliated entities, and the Witness
11
12
ALSO PRESENT:
13
14
GREGORY P. NERO, ESQ., Sterling Equities
DANIEL McCLUTCHY, Videographer
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BENDISH REPORTING, INC.
877.404.2193
PICARD v. KATZ, et al.
CONFIDENTIAL
SAUL B. KATZ 1/13/12
249
1
2
3
observations?
A.
Q.
No, I don't recall.
Do you recall any -- particularly
4
with regard to any discussion of expected volatility
5
changes over time?
6
7
A.
Q.
No.
Do you recall anyone ever suggesting
8
to you that given Mr. Madoff's strategy, you should
9
expect volatility changes?
10
11
A.
Q.
I don't recall that.
Okay.
All right.
I want to go to a
12
different topic and this one is going to be SEC
13
investigations, okay, of Mr. Madoff.
14
15
16
A.
SEC investigations.
Okay, through
with this.
Q.
First of all, do you have any
17
recollection of any SEC investigations of
18
Mr. Madoff?
19
A.
20
heard secondhand.
21
Q.
Only what I've seen in the papers or
When you say -- let's do first what
22
you'd seen in the papers.
23
his confession?
24
A.
25
Q.
Was that before or after
Before.
Okay.
And what did you see in the
BENDISH REPORTING, INC.
877.404.2193
PICARD v. KATZ, et al.
CONFIDENTIAL
SAUL B. KATZ 1/13/12
250
1
papers before his confession?
2
A.
That there was an issue with some
3
accountants in Florida who were running some sort of
4
a fund that the SEC wasn't happy with.
5
came in and they investigated, as I recall, closed
6
up the fund and required Madoff, who appears to have
7
been managing that fund, to send back all the money
8
to those people.
9
Q.
10
And they
A.
Um-hum.
And as I recall, Ike Sorkin, who was
11
a friend of ours, through the law firm that he had
12
been with before, Howard Squadron's firm, was
13
representing, as I recall, he was representing
14
Bernie, and said that the SEC closed one, no problem
15
with Bernie after their -- whatever their
16
investigation was, and Bernie quickly sent back the
17
money to the fund and it was redistributed to the
18
people.
19
people tried to get right back into Bernie directly,
20
as opposed to through the accounting firm.
21
And as Ike had told me, that most of those
Q.
Other than the SEC investigation you
22
just described for us, are you aware of any other
23
SEC investigations of Mr. Madoff?
24
25
A.
Not before this whole thing broke,
when I read in the papers that there were five or
BENDISH REPORTING, INC.
877.404.2193
PICARD v. KATZ, et al.
CONFIDENTIAL
SAUL B. KATZ 1/13/12
251
1
six or seven.
2
Q.
Okay.
3
4
All right.
(Exhibit Trustee 358, Memo 7/29/99,
Bates SE_T954409-10, marked for identification.)
5
Q.
Mr. Katz, I show you what has been
6
marked by the reporter as Exhibit 358.
7
a -- first of all, do you have any recollection of
8
this document?
9
A.
10
Q.
Do you have
No, sir.
Was this to -- have you seen it prior
11
to today?
12
seen it prior to today?
13
A.
14
15
Q.
Do you have any recollection that you've
I don't remember.
I don't remember.
What it purports to be is a memo from
AF, who I'm assuming is Arthur --
16
A.
17
Q.
Arthur Friedman.
-- Friedman.
18
partners.
19
think.
20
And it's to all
Partners being Sterling Equities, I
why don't I stop doing that.
All right.
21
But I'm only guessing here, so
In other words, do you have any --
22
why don't you read the document and tell me what
23
your understanding of it is, and if after reading it
24
you have any recollection of it.
25
A.
Yes, sir.
BENDISH REPORTING, INC.
877.404.2193
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?