Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al

Filing 153

DECLARATION of DANA M. SESHENS in Support re: 143 MOTION in Limine TO BAR USE OF PREJUDICIAL PHRASE., 145 MOTION in Limine TO EXCLUDE STERLING STAMOS DOCUMENTS.. Document filed by Charles 15 Associates, Charles 15 LLC, Charles Sterling LLC, Charles Sterling Sub LLC, College Place Enterprises LLC, Coney Island Baseball Holding Company LLC, Estate of Leonard Schreier, FFB Aviation LLC, FS Company LLC, Fred Wilpon Family Trust, Arthur Friedman, Ruth Friedman, Iris J. Katz and Saul B. Katz Family Foundation, Inc., Judy and Fred Wilpon Family Foundation, Inc., Amy Beth Katz, David Katz, Dayle Katz, Gregory Katz, Howard Katz, Iris Katz, 157 J.E.S. LLC, Air Sterling LLC, BAS Aircraft LLC, Jason Bacher, Bon Mick Family Partners LP, Bon-Mick, Inc., Brooklyn Baseball Company LLC, C.D.S. Corp., Michael Katz, Saul B. Katz, Todd Katz, Katz 2002 Descendants' Trust, Heather Katz Knopf, Natalie Katz O'Brien, Mets II LLC, Mets Limited Partnership, Mets One LLC, Mets Partners, Inc., Minor 1 (REDACTED), Minor 2 (REDACTED), L. Thomas Osterman, Phyllis Rebell Osterman, Realty Associates Madoff II, Red Valley Partners, Robbinsville Park LLC, Ruskin Garden Apartments LLC, Saul B. Katz Family Trust, Michael Schreier, Deyva Schreier Arthur, See Holdco LLC, See Holdings I, See Holdings II, Sterling 10 LLC, Sterling 15C LLC, Sterling 20 LLC, Sterling Acquisitions LLC, Sterling American Advisors II LP, Sterling American Property III LP, Sterling American Property IV LP, Sterling American Property V LP, Sterling Brunswick Corporation, Sterling Brunswick Seven LLC, Sterling Dist Properties LLC, Sterling Equities, Sterling Equities Associates, Sterling Equities Investors, Sterling Heritage LLC, Sterling Internal V LLC, Sterling Jet II Ltd., Sterling Jet Ltd., Sterling Mets Associates, Sterling Mets Associates II, Sterling Mets LP, Sterling Pathogenesis Company, Sterling Third Associates, Sterling Thirty Venture LLC, Sterling Tracing LLC, Sterling Twenty Five LLC, Sterling VC IV LLC, Sterling VC V LLC, Edward M. Tepper, Elise C. Tepper, Jacqueline G. Tepper, Marvin B. Tepper, Valley Harbor Associates, Kimberly Wachtler, Philip Wachtler, Bruce N. Wilpon, Daniel Wilpon, Debra Wilpon, Fred Wilpon, Jeffrey Wilpon, Jessica Wilpon, Judith Wilpon, Richard Wilpon, Scott Wilpon, Valerie Wilpon, Wilpon 2002 Descendants' Trust, Robin Wilpon Wachtler. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P)(Seshens, Dana)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT M 1 1 C O N F I D E N T I A L 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 11-CV-03605(JSR)(HBP) 3 4 5 ----------------------------------x 6 IRVING H. PICARD, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, 7 8 Videotaped Deposition of: Plaintiff, CHRISTOPHER STAMOS 9 10 11 12 vs. SAUL B. KATZ, et al., Defendants. ----------------------------------x 13 14 15 Transcript of testimony as taken by and before 16 LESLIE ROCKWOOD, Certified Court Reporter, RPR and Notary 17 Public of the State of California, at the offices of 18 Shearman & Sterling, Four Embarcadero, Suite 3800, 19 San Francisco, California, on Wednesday, January 4, 2012, 20 commencing at 9:31 a.m. 21 22 23 24 25 PICARD v. KATZ, et al. CONFIDENTIAL CHRISTOPHER STAMOS 1/4/12 46 1 didn't -- it wasn't my responsibility to know much about 2 their business. 3 Q. Does the name Chuck Klein ring a bell? 4 A. It does. 5 Q. Do you know if Chuck Klein was associated 6 7 with Sterling American Properties? A. I don't. It just rings a bell. I can't 8 remember if he was a client or friend of my brother's. 9 don't think I met Chuck Klein, and if I did, I can't 10 11 12 I remember him. Q. Is there anything else you can remember about Chuck Klein right now? 13 A. No. 14 Q. In addition to helping create -- strike that. 15 16 17 As part of creating a logo, why were you combining the names Sterling and Stamos? A. So our branding approach was to try to 18 co-brand with Sterling. 19 you co-brand, you try to get the halo effect from your 20 partner to apply to yourself. 21 We're a new company, and when So the idea was Sterling had been doing work 22 in New York and building a reputation for Sterling 23 Equities, Sterling American Properties. 24 had been building a good reputation in New York, and we 25 wanted some of that to apply to us, but we wanted to be BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193 Sterling Group PICARD v. KATZ, et al. CONFIDENTIAL CHRISTOPHER STAMOS 1/4/12 47 1 separate. 2 So the idea was to take both names to show 3 that we're partners, but also be separate so that people 4 would understand that we are separate from Sterling 5 Equities, Sterling American Properties. 6 Q. 7 mean by "co-brand"? 8 A. 9 And just so the record is clear, what do you So co-branding means to associate your name with a pre-existing company so that you can get some of 10 the positive associations that company has applied to 11 your company as well. 12 13 14 Q. And when you use the phrase "halo effect," what are you referring to? A. If they are a company with a good reputation, 15 then that halo means their good reputation covers your 16 head as well. 17 18 19 Q. And when were you trying to combine or co-brand the two names of Sterling and Stamos? A. Again, it was in that early period when we 20 were still SP Capital, but we were going to form the new 21 name, new LLC. 22 it was the first few -- maybe the first six months of my 23 being in the company. 24 25 Q. And I don't remember the exact date, but And so is it fair to say that part of the time that you were creating this logo, you were working BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193 PICARD v. KATZ, et al. CONFIDENTIAL CHRISTOPHER STAMOS 1/4/12 50 1 MR. DITCHFIELD: 2 THE WITNESS: 3 "have to." 4 Objection. Again, I don't like the word anything, but... 5 Q. So I would say no, he didn't have to do BY MS. KOSACK: Did Peter ever consult with 6 Saul Katz in connection with the co-branding projects, to 7 the best of your knowledge? 8 MS. BIEBER: Objection. 9 You can answer. 10 MR. DITCHFIELD: 11 THE WITNESS: Objection. To the best of my knowledge, he 12 didn't because I don't think Saul would be interested in 13 the logo or -- 14 Q. BY MS. KOSACK: Did Peter ever consult, to 15 the best of your knowledge, with David Katz in connection 16 with the co-branding projects? 17 18 19 A. Again, to the best of my knowledge, no, but that was eight years ago and... Q. To the best of your knowledge, did Peter ever 20 consult with Fred Wilpon in connection with the 21 co-branding projects? 22 A. That I'm pretty sure he didn't. Again, if 23 Saul was removed, Fred was even more removed. 24 be surprised if Fred wanted to look at our logo. 25 Q. So I would And going back to the halo effect, what, if BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193 PICARD v. KATZ, et al. CONFIDENTIAL CHRISTOPHER STAMOS 1/4/12 51 1 any, halo effect did you hope to obtain from Sterling 2 Equities? 3 A. My understanding was the 30-some years of 4 doing business in New York, Saul and Fred had a 5 reputation for taking care of their partners, being very 6 ethical, being very generous, their philanthropic work, 7 they've earned a reputation for being very quiet and 8 generous in their giving. 9 And baseball, in our business, baseball 10 carries a lot of weight. 11 having access to the owner's box is a great thing for 12 clients, and hedge fund managers like baseball in 13 general. 14 Q. So owning the New York Mets, And when you say in your business baseball 15 carries a lot of weight, what else did you mean in 16 addition to what you just said, if anything? 17 A. I don't think I meant anything more than if 18 you could call up someone and say, "Do you guys want to 19 come to the owner's box," they would be pretty happy 20 about it. 21 Q. Where did you obtain your understanding of 22 the information you just described as part of the halo 23 effect of Sterling Equities? 24 MR. DITCHFIELD: 25 MS. BIEBER: Objection to the form. Objection. BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193 PICARD v. KATZ, et al. CONFIDENTIAL CHRISTOPHER STAMOS 1/4/12 52 1 You can answer. 2 THE WITNESS: From my brother Peter telling 3 me that Saul and Fred have a great reputation in this 4 city and we can benefit from that reputation. 5 Q. BY MS. KOSACK: Did Peter tell you anything 6 else about Saul and Fred at this time? 7 MR. DITCHFIELD: 8 THE WITNESS: 9 Q. Objection to the form. BY MS. KOSACK: Not that I can recall. Did you ever have any 10 discussions with Peter about Saul Katz and Fred Wilpon's 11 investments at this time? 12 13 A. Their personal investments or their investments with us? 14 Q. Let's start with their personal investments. 15 A. Their personal investments, no, but part of 16 my job was to know how much money Saul and Fred are 17 invested with Sterling Stamos. 18 Q. During these initial stages, did you have 19 discussions with Peter Stamos about Saul Katz and Fred 20 Wilpon's investments with Sterling Stamos? 21 A. Yes. 22 Q. What were those discussions about? 23 A. The discussions were about how much money 24 they had with us in the funds, meaning total, like how 25 many millions are invested in which specific fund. BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?