Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al

Filing 172

DECLARATION of Regina L. Griffin in Opposition re: 145 MOTION in Limine TO EXCLUDE STERLING STAMOS DOCUMENTS.. Document filed by Irving H. Picard. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit #1-61 Filed Under Seal Pursuant to Protective Order)(Bohorquez, Fernando)

Download PDF
27. Attached hereto as Exhibit 26 is a true and correct copy of an email from Mark Thompson to Ashok Chachra, dated December 16, 2008 bearing Bates nos. SSMT00934925-SSMT00934931. (Trustee’s Dep. Ex. 329.) 28. Attached hereto as Exhibit 27 is a true and correct copy of an email from Ashok Chachra to Peter Stamos, dated December 13, 2008 bearing Bates nos. SSMT01194929-SSMT01194931. (Trustee’s Dep. Ex. 330.) 29. Attached hereto as Exhibit 28 is a true and correct copy of a draft of Sterling Stamos employee biographies. (SSKW00003866 - SSKW00003873.) 30. Attached hereto as Exhibit 29 is a true and correct copy of “company blurb” describing Sterling Stamos. (SSKW00001697.) 31. Attached hereto as Exhibit 30 is a true and correct copy of an email from Richard Stockton to Peter Stamos, dated March 5, 2003. (SE_T954253.) 32. Attached hereto as Exhibit 31 is a DeMarche Associates Hedge Fund Manager Questionnaire, dated February 1, 2005. (SSMT00184407-SSMT00184431.) 33. Attached hereto as Exhibit 32 is a true and correct copy of an email from David Katz to Chris Stamos, dated December 20, 2004. (SSKW00003308.) 34. Attached hereto as Exhibit 33 is a true and correct copy of an email from Ashok Chachra to Saul B. Katz, Peter Stamos, and Noreen Harrington, dated November 27, 2002. (SSMT01227372.) 35. Attached hereto as Exhibit 34 is a true and correct copy of an email from Peter Stamos to Saul B. Katz and David Katz, dated November 29, 2004. (SE_T680399.) 36. Attached hereto as Exhibit 35 is a true and correct copy of an email from Scott Whitcher to Chris Stamos and Kevin Okimoto, dated May 11, 2004, attaching a 300205867

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?