Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al
Filing
84
DECLARATION of David J. Sheehan in Support re: 82 MOTION to Strike the Expert Report and Testimony of John Maine.. Document filed by Irving H. Picard. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7-1, # 8 Exhibit 7-2, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10)(Sheehan, David)
Exhibit 5
1
1
C O N F I D E N T I A L
2
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ADV. PRO. NO. 08-01789 (BRL)
3
4
5
-------------------------------x
SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION
CORPORATION,
Videotaped
6
Plaintiff-Applicant,
7
v.
10
BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT
SECURITIES, LLC,
Defendant.
-------------------------------x
In Re:
11
BERNARD L. MADOFF,
12
Rule 2004
Examination of:
Debtor.
-------------------------------x
8
9
ARTHUR FRIEDMAN
(Volume I)
13
14
15
TRANSCRIPT of testimony as taken by and before
16
NANCY C. BENDISH, Certified Court Reporter, RMR, CRR
17
and Notary Public of the States of New York and New
18
Jersey, at the offices of Baker & Hostetler, 45
19
Rockefeller Plaza, New York, New York on Tuesday,
20
June 22, 2010, commencing at 10:11 a.m.
21
22
23
24
25
BENDISH REPORTING, INC.
Litigation Support Services
877.404.2193
www.bendish.com
ARTHUR FRIEDMAN 6/22/10
CONFIDENTIAL
SIPC v. BLMIS
144
1
A.
2
I really don't recollect exactly.
Q.
Did you check all of the trades for
3
all of the accounts at that, whatever time period
4
you were doing it, or did you just pick one account?
5
6
A.
accounts because everything was a mirror image.
7
Q.
8
9
No, I checked -- no, not all of the
Fair enough.
A.
In other words, he would buy seven --
if he bought seven securities, it would be seven
10
securities in each account.
11
account.
12
Q.
13
I wouldn't have done every other account.
A.
14
So I only had to do one
Q.
But you would have done -I would have done every trade, yes.
So, you indicated that you attempted
15
to replicate Madoff's strategy.
16
Tell me.
17
18
A.
What did you do?
Trying to recollect exactly what I
did.
19
I would take the stocks that he
20
purchased, and I believe what I did was to follow
21
the strategy.
22
testing what he did that he's giving us accurate
23
numbers, but if I utilize his strategy, let's say
24
when I got the slips that said this is what he
25
bought, I would take that information and then try
What I'd want to see is I wasn't
BENDISH REPORTING, INC.
877.404.2193
ARTHUR FRIEDMAN 6/22/10
CONFIDENTIAL
SIPC v. BLMIS
145
1
to enact it on my own account.
2
quantities, didn't matter the quantity, but just to
3
take what to buy, but I would always be lagging
4
behind him.
5
would do, and I found that he did, I'm making up,
6
say 15 percent.
7
made a profit.
8
strategy was good, it worked, but not to the extent
9
that it worked for him.
10
Different
Just to get a general idea of how I
I did more like six percent.
I
I determined in my own mind that the
One of the major reasons was the
11
commission.
12
somehow what the commission would be, what I'd have
13
to pay if I did this on my own.
14
little or no commission, and that made a big
15
difference when you're dealing with, just looking to
16
try to make one percent a month, that made a
17
difference.
18
Q.
When I did the strategy I determined
Whereas he had
So your understanding was that the
19
difference between the -- I know you made these
20
numbers up, but your six percent return that you
21
were able to accomplish and his 14 or 16, whatever
22
you said, was primarily driven by the absence of
23
commission costs?
24
25
MS. SESHENS:
A.
Objection to the form.
That was one of -BENDISH REPORTING, INC.
877.404.2193
ARTHUR FRIEDMAN 6/22/10
CONFIDENTIAL
SIPC v. BLMIS
146
1
MS. SESHENS:
2
A.
Sorry.
Go ahead.
That was one major factor.
It could
3
also -- again, I'm doing it after the fact, just
4
using his information, that could change my result
5
either way.
6
later using his strategy the market -- I was able to
7
make a better purchase than he did, then, you know,
8
it could have gone either way.
9
Q.
I mean, if the next day or two days
If Madoff wasn't charging a
10
commission, is that what you told me?
11
understanding was he wasn't charging you a
12
commission?
13
A.
Your
My understanding was that he was
14
making a market in some or all of these stocks and
15
he was making money but he determined the price.
16
he could buy it at one and sell it to us, in effect,
17
at one-and-1/16th, but the one-and-1/16th was
18
certainly a fair price and certainly it traded
19
during the day well above one-and-1/16th -- these
20
are all examples, of course -- he was making a
21
commission or a substitute for commission, the
22
1/16th.
23
at whatever price, one-and-1/16th, and then pay a
24
commission on top of that.
25
Q.
If
But I would actually have to go and buy it
If you bought it from someone other
BENDISH REPORTING, INC.
877.404.2193
236
C O N F I D E N T I A L
1
2
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ADV. PRO. NO. 08-01789 (BRL)
3
4
5
6
-------------------------------x
SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Applicant,
7
v.
Videotaped
Rule 2004
Examination of:
8
9
10
BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT
SECURITIES, LLC,
Defendant.
-------------------------------x
In Re:
ARTHUR FRIEDMAN
(Volume II)
11
BERNARD L. MADOFF,
12
13
Debtor.
-------------------------------x
14
15
TRANSCRIPT of videotaped testimony as taken by
16
and before PATRICIA MULLIGAN CARRUTHERS, Certified
17
Court Reporter, RPR, RMR, RDR, and Notary Public of
18
the States of New York and New Jersey, at the
19
offices of Baker & Hostetler, 45 Rockefeller Plaza,
20
New York, New York on Wednesday, June 23, 2010,
21
commencing at 10:07 a.m.
22
23
24
25
BENDISH REPORTING, INC.
Litigation Support Services
877.404.2193
www.bendish.com
ARTHUR FRIEDMAN 6/23/10
CONFIDENTIAL
SIPC v. BLMIS
336
1
break, that is the hell sheet.
2
A.
3
That is correct.
Q.
4
be?
5
What is the hell sheet intended to
document?
6
Correct?
What does it represent?
A.
What's shown on that
It's all of the accounts listed
7
numerically.
The 1KW numbers.
The name of the
8
account, the total amount on -- in the account as of
9
the date in question spread across the top by who
10
the owners are.
11
times the total, the numbers will equal that total
12
column when you add them up.
13
Q.
So allocating their percentage
Okay.
And as we talked about before,
14
the way this printed out, you would actually have to
15
take the page where the control number ends with 266
16
and line that up next to the first page of the
17
printout which is Control 260, right, because
18
there's more things going out this way to the right.
19
20
A.
Q.
Uh-huh.
Is that correct?
Because you'll note
21
the account numbers repeat themselves.
22
over at one.
23
24
25
They start
So what was the -- Was this done
every month?
A.
Yes.
BENDISH REPORTING, INC.
877.404.2193
ARTHUR FRIEDMAN 6/23/10
CONFIDENTIAL
SIPC v. BLMIS
337
1
2
3
Q.
A.
Q.
4
A.
Yes.
What was this used for each month, if
anything?
5
By you or your staff?
Well, the -- seeing how we did on a
6
month-to-month basis percentagewise, what was the
7
profit, and for each individual account holder, each
8
partner would get an idea or check the amount in
9
particular accounts, but it was a reference to the
10
11
balances in every account.
Q.
Okay.
Now, when you say "every
12
account," would this -- this would include then
13
the -- what you call "the outsiders"?
14
15
16
17
A.
Q.
Yes.
And why were they included, if they
were outsiders, in the totals?
A.
Well, it was a separate total, but I
18
personally would use them because I would have
19
questions, people calling, What is the -- how did we
20
do this month or what's the balance in my account or
21
I would like to withdraw a certain amount or the
22
efficiency factor, whatever it might be.
23
reference that I used on a monthly basis.
24
Q.
25
factor."
Okay.
I had a
And you mentioned "efficiency
What was that?
BENDISH REPORTING, INC.
877.404.2193
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?