Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al

Filing 84

DECLARATION of David J. Sheehan in Support re: 82 MOTION to Strike the Expert Report and Testimony of John Maine.. Document filed by Irving H. Picard. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7-1, # 8 Exhibit 7-2, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10)(Sheehan, David)

Download PDF
Exhibit 5 1 1 C O N F I D E N T I A L 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ADV. PRO. NO. 08-01789 (BRL) 3 4 5 -------------------------------x SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Videotaped 6 Plaintiff-Applicant, 7 v. 10 BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES, LLC, Defendant. -------------------------------x In Re: 11 BERNARD L. MADOFF, 12 Rule 2004 Examination of: Debtor. -------------------------------x 8 9 ARTHUR FRIEDMAN (Volume I) 13 14 15 TRANSCRIPT of testimony as taken by and before 16 NANCY C. BENDISH, Certified Court Reporter, RMR, CRR 17 and Notary Public of the States of New York and New 18 Jersey, at the offices of Baker & Hostetler, 45 19 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, New York on Tuesday, 20 June 22, 2010, commencing at 10:11 a.m. 21 22 23 24 25 BENDISH REPORTING, INC. Litigation Support Services 877.404.2193 www.bendish.com ARTHUR FRIEDMAN 6/22/10 CONFIDENTIAL SIPC v. BLMIS 144 1 A. 2 I really don't recollect exactly. Q. Did you check all of the trades for 3 all of the accounts at that, whatever time period 4 you were doing it, or did you just pick one account? 5 6 A. accounts because everything was a mirror image. 7 Q. 8 9 No, I checked -- no, not all of the Fair enough. A. In other words, he would buy seven -- if he bought seven securities, it would be seven 10 securities in each account. 11 account. 12 Q. 13 I wouldn't have done every other account. A. 14 So I only had to do one Q. But you would have done -I would have done every trade, yes. So, you indicated that you attempted 15 to replicate Madoff's strategy. 16 Tell me. 17 18 A. What did you do? Trying to recollect exactly what I did. 19 I would take the stocks that he 20 purchased, and I believe what I did was to follow 21 the strategy. 22 testing what he did that he's giving us accurate 23 numbers, but if I utilize his strategy, let's say 24 when I got the slips that said this is what he 25 bought, I would take that information and then try What I'd want to see is I wasn't BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193 ARTHUR FRIEDMAN 6/22/10 CONFIDENTIAL SIPC v. BLMIS 145 1 to enact it on my own account. 2 quantities, didn't matter the quantity, but just to 3 take what to buy, but I would always be lagging 4 behind him. 5 would do, and I found that he did, I'm making up, 6 say 15 percent. 7 made a profit. 8 strategy was good, it worked, but not to the extent 9 that it worked for him. 10 Different Just to get a general idea of how I I did more like six percent. I I determined in my own mind that the One of the major reasons was the 11 commission. 12 somehow what the commission would be, what I'd have 13 to pay if I did this on my own. 14 little or no commission, and that made a big 15 difference when you're dealing with, just looking to 16 try to make one percent a month, that made a 17 difference. 18 Q. When I did the strategy I determined Whereas he had So your understanding was that the 19 difference between the -- I know you made these 20 numbers up, but your six percent return that you 21 were able to accomplish and his 14 or 16, whatever 22 you said, was primarily driven by the absence of 23 commission costs? 24 25 MS. SESHENS: A. Objection to the form. That was one of -BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193 ARTHUR FRIEDMAN 6/22/10 CONFIDENTIAL SIPC v. BLMIS 146 1 MS. SESHENS: 2 A. Sorry. Go ahead. That was one major factor. It could 3 also -- again, I'm doing it after the fact, just 4 using his information, that could change my result 5 either way. 6 later using his strategy the market -- I was able to 7 make a better purchase than he did, then, you know, 8 it could have gone either way. 9 Q. I mean, if the next day or two days If Madoff wasn't charging a 10 commission, is that what you told me? 11 understanding was he wasn't charging you a 12 commission? 13 A. Your My understanding was that he was 14 making a market in some or all of these stocks and 15 he was making money but he determined the price. 16 he could buy it at one and sell it to us, in effect, 17 at one-and-1/16th, but the one-and-1/16th was 18 certainly a fair price and certainly it traded 19 during the day well above one-and-1/16th -- these 20 are all examples, of course -- he was making a 21 commission or a substitute for commission, the 22 1/16th. 23 at whatever price, one-and-1/16th, and then pay a 24 commission on top of that. 25 Q. If But I would actually have to go and buy it If you bought it from someone other BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193 236 C O N F I D E N T I A L 1 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ADV. PRO. NO. 08-01789 (BRL) 3 4 5 6 -------------------------------x SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Applicant, 7 v. Videotaped Rule 2004 Examination of: 8 9 10 BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES, LLC, Defendant. -------------------------------x In Re: ARTHUR FRIEDMAN (Volume II) 11 BERNARD L. MADOFF, 12 13 Debtor. -------------------------------x 14 15 TRANSCRIPT of videotaped testimony as taken by 16 and before PATRICIA MULLIGAN CARRUTHERS, Certified 17 Court Reporter, RPR, RMR, RDR, and Notary Public of 18 the States of New York and New Jersey, at the 19 offices of Baker & Hostetler, 45 Rockefeller Plaza, 20 New York, New York on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 21 commencing at 10:07 a.m. 22 23 24 25 BENDISH REPORTING, INC. Litigation Support Services 877.404.2193 www.bendish.com ARTHUR FRIEDMAN 6/23/10 CONFIDENTIAL SIPC v. BLMIS 336 1 break, that is the hell sheet. 2 A. 3 That is correct. Q. 4 be? 5 What is the hell sheet intended to document? 6 Correct? What does it represent? A. What's shown on that It's all of the accounts listed 7 numerically. The 1KW numbers. The name of the 8 account, the total amount on -- in the account as of 9 the date in question spread across the top by who 10 the owners are. 11 times the total, the numbers will equal that total 12 column when you add them up. 13 Q. So allocating their percentage Okay. And as we talked about before, 14 the way this printed out, you would actually have to 15 take the page where the control number ends with 266 16 and line that up next to the first page of the 17 printout which is Control 260, right, because 18 there's more things going out this way to the right. 19 20 A. Q. Uh-huh. Is that correct? Because you'll note 21 the account numbers repeat themselves. 22 over at one. 23 24 25 They start So what was the -- Was this done every month? A. Yes. BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193 ARTHUR FRIEDMAN 6/23/10 CONFIDENTIAL SIPC v. BLMIS 337 1 2 3 Q. A. Q. 4 A. Yes. What was this used for each month, if anything? 5 By you or your staff? Well, the -- seeing how we did on a 6 month-to-month basis percentagewise, what was the 7 profit, and for each individual account holder, each 8 partner would get an idea or check the amount in 9 particular accounts, but it was a reference to the 10 11 balances in every account. Q. Okay. Now, when you say "every 12 account," would this -- this would include then 13 the -- what you call "the outsiders"? 14 15 16 17 A. Q. Yes. And why were they included, if they were outsiders, in the totals? A. Well, it was a separate total, but I 18 personally would use them because I would have 19 questions, people calling, What is the -- how did we 20 do this month or what's the balance in my account or 21 I would like to withdraw a certain amount or the 22 efficiency factor, whatever it might be. 23 reference that I used on a monthly basis. 24 Q. 25 factor." Okay. I had a And you mentioned "efficiency What was that? BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?