Unites States of America v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing 347

MOTION for ROBERT BROOKS BELL to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8768952. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kobo Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing - New York, # 2 Certificate of Good Standing - District of Columbia, # 3 Text of Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice, # 4 Certificate of Service)(Wallance, Gregory)

Download PDF
Unites States of America v. Apple, Inc. et al Doc. 347 Att. 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., et al., Defendants. THE STATE OF TEXAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PENGUIN GROUP (USA) INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 12-cv-2826 (DLC) Civil Action No. 12-cv-03394 (DLC) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Gregory J. Wallance, on behalf of Kobo Inc., herby certify that on August 8, 2013, I caused to be served copies of: (1) MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE ON BEHALF OF ROBERT B. BELL; (2) [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE; and (3) CERTIFICATES OF GOOD STANDING FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA via the Electronic Filing System on the registered individuals, and via First-Class Mail on the following individual: 61415351_1.DOCX Dockets.Justia.com Ryan Kriger Assistant Attorney General Public Protection Division Vermont Attorney General's Office 109 State Street Montpelier, VT 05609 Date: August 8, 2013 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Gregory J. Wallance_____________ Gregory J. Wallance Kaye Scholer LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 836-8878 Robert B. Bell* (pro hac vice pending) Kaye Scholer LLP 901 Fifteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 (202) 682-3500 Counsel for Proposed Amicus Curiae Kobo Inc. 61415351_1.DOCX 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?