Unites States of America v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing 479

NOTICE OF APPEAL from (685 in 1:11-md-02293-DLC) Order, (684 in 1:11-md-02293-DLC) Order. Document filed by Dianne Young Erwin. Filing fee $ 505.00, receipt number 0208-10421257. Form C and Form D are due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Attorney Fee Award, # 2 Exhibit B - Final Judgment)Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02293-DLC et al.(Stein, David)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT ''B'' Case 1:11-md-02293-DLC Document 683-1 Filed 11/19/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORI<. No. 11-md-02293 (DLC) IN RE ELECTRONIC BOOKS ANTITRUST LITIGATION ECF Case This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS THE STATE OF TEXAS, et al., No. 12-cv-3394 (DLC) Plaintiffs, ECF Case v. PENGUIN GROUP (USA) INC., et al., Defendants. This matter came for a duly-noticed hearing on November 21, 2014, upon Motion by Plaintiff States and Settlement Class ("Plaintiffs") for Final Approval of Settlement with Apple Inc. ("Apple") in the above-captioned actions (Plaintiffs and Apple are hereafter referred to collectively as "Parties"). Plaintiffs' Motion was consented to by Apple. Having reviewed the Motion and the Memorandum in Support filed therewith, any objections filed thereto, and upon all pleadings and proceedings had herein, this Comt finds as follows: Plaintiff States and Settlement Class filed separate complaints in this Court against Apple and others, alleging an unlawful agreement to inflate, fix, maintain or stabilize the prices ofEbooks in violation offederal antitrust laws ("Complaints"); - 1- Case 1:11-md-02293-DLC Document 683-1 Filed 11119/14 Page 2 of 7 Plaintiff States seek damages and injunctive relief in their sovereign capacity and as parens patriae on behalf of Eligible Consumers residing in Plaintiff States who have purchased eligible E-books from a Named Publisher; Class Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief on behalf of Eligible Consumers in the Settlement Class (as defined below) who have purchased eligible E-books from a Named Publisher; In order to resolve any and all disputes arising from the Complaints as to Apple (except for Plaintiff States' claims for injunctive relief against Apple, which are currently under appeal in the Liability Appeal) the parties executed a Settlement Agreement by and among Apple Inc., Plaintiff States and Class Plaintiffs ("Settlement Agreement") dated July 10, 2014, which is incorporated by reference herein; The Settlement Agreement does not constitute an admission of liability or of any issue of fact or law by Apple; In full and final settlement of the claims set forth in the Complaints, Apple will pay compensatory damages, costs of notice and settlement administration, payments to Plaintiff States, and attorneys' fees and costs to Class Counsel as outlined in the Settlement Agreement and as awarded by the Cowi; Any payments made by Apple for Eligible Consumer compensation pursuant to Section III.A.l of the Settlement Agreement do not constitute, nor shall they be treated as, payments in lieu of fines, penalties, punitive recoveries or forfeitures. Any payments made by Apple for Eligible Consumer compensation pursuant to Section III.B.l of the Settlement Agreement do not constitute, nor shall they be treated as, payments in lieu of treble damages, fines, penalties, punitive recoveries or forfeitures; -2- Case 1:11-md-02293-DLC Document 683-1 Filed 11/19/14 Page 3 of 7 The Parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure II; and Pursuant to this Court's Preliminary Approval Order, notice of the Settlement Agreement was given and an opportunity to be heard was given to all persons requesting to be heard in accordance with this Court's orders. The Court has reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the submissions of the Parties in support of it, and the comments and objections received in response to the notice. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: I. DEFINITIONS All capitalized terms in this Final Judgment shall have the same meaning as defined in the Settlement. Agreement. II. JURISDICTION This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over Apple. The Complaints state a claim upon which relief may be granted against Apple pursuant to I5 U.S.C. §§IS, I5c and 26. Jurisdiction lies in this CoUit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § I5 and 28 U.S.C. § I332(d). III. A. APPLICABILITY This Final Judgment shall apply to Plaintiff States, Settlement Class, Apple and Consumers who did not file with the Court valid and timely requests for exclusion from the Settlement Agreement. The Court finds that the persons listed on Attachment A to this Final Judgment submitted valid and timely exclusion requests. IV. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT APPROVAL The Court has determined that the Settlement Agreement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate and in the best interests of Consumers, and that notice thereof comports -3- Case 1:11-md-02293-DLC Document 683-1 Filed 11119/14 Page 4 of 7 in all respects with 15 U.S.C. §§ 15 and 15c, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and due process. This CoU1i further fmds the Settlement set forth in the Settlement Agreement is the result of arm's-length negotiations between experienced counsel representing the interests of Consumers and Apple. Accordingly, the Settlement embodied in the Settlement Agreement is hereby approved in all respects and shall be consummated in accordance with their terms and provisions. Any and all objections thereto are overruled. V. A. CLASS CERTIFICATION The Court finally certifies the following Settlement Class: [a]ll persons in the Non-Litigating Jurisdictions who purchased Ebooks between Aprill, 2010 and May 21,2012, published by Hachette Book Group, Inc. ("Hachette"), HarperCollins Publishers L.L.C. ("HarperCollins"), Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC d/b/a Macmillan ("Macmillan"), Penguin Group (USA) Inc. ("Penguin"), or Simon & Schuster, Inc. ("Simon & Schuster") directly from that publisher (including any of its imprints) after the adoption ofthe agency model by that publisher. The "NonLitigating Jurisdictions" are American Samoa, California, Florida, Georgia, Guam, Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Nmthern Mariana Islands, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, U.S. Virgin Islands, Washington, and Wyoming. Excluded from the Class are Defendants, their employees, co-conspirators, officers, directors, legal representatives, heirs, successors, and wholly or partly owned subsidiaries of affiliated companies, as well as the Honorable Denise L. Cote and persons described in 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(4)-(5). B. This certification is for settlement purposes only and shall not constitute, nor be construed as, an admission on the part of Apple that this Action, or any other proposed or certified class action, is appropriate for any other purpose, including, without limitation, for trial class treatment. C. The Com1 appoints the following as the named plaintiffs for this Settlement Class: Anthony Petru, Thomas Friedman, and Shane S. Davis. -4- Case 1:11-md-02293-DLC Document 683-1 Filed 11/19/14 Page 5 of 7 D. The Comt designates Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC as Counsel for the Settlement Class. E. This Court finds and concludes that the applicable requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 have been satisfied with respect to the Settlement Class and Settlement, and specifically, that: (a) the number of members of the Settlement Class are so numerous that joinder of all members thereof is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class; (c) named plaintiffs' claims are typical ofthe claims of the Settlement Class they seek to represent; (d) named plaintiffs and Class Counsel have fairly and adequately represented and protected the interests of the Settlement Class and will continue to do so; and (e) common questions of law and fact predominate over individual questions with respect to the Settlement Class and Settlement. F. Pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court hereby approves the Settlement set forth in the Settlement Agreement and finds that said Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable and adequate to, and are in the best interests of, the named plaintiffs, the Settlement Class and each of the Settlement Class Members. VI. CONSUMER DISTRIBUTION PLAN Plaintiffs' Consumer Distribution Plan ("Distribution Plan"), as set forth in Exhibit J to the Memorandum in Support ofPlaintiffs' Motion for Final Approval of Apple Settlement and Distribution Plan, is fair, reasonable and adequate and is hereby approved. Plaintiffs are directed to cause the Consumer Compensation funds, if any, be distributed in accordance with said Distribution Plan as soon as practicable after the Effective Date of this Settlement. VII. STATE PAYMENTS The Court hereby approves the distribution to Plaintiff States of the State Compensation funds, if any, provided by Section V.B of the Settlement Agreement. Plaintiff States may allocate -5- Case 1:11-md-02293-DLC Document 683-1 Filed 11/19/14 Page 6 of 7 and distribute these funds at their discretion as set out in Section V.B of the Settlement Agreement any time after the Effective Date, and without fwther order of this Court. 1 VIII. NO ADMISSION OF LIABILITY Neither this Final Judgment nor the Settlement Agreement shall be used or construed by any person as an admission of liability by Apple to any pmty or person, or be deemed evidence of any violation of any statute or law or admission of any liability or wrongdoing by Apple or of the truth of any of the claims or allegations contained in the Complaints. Neither this Final Judgment nor the Settlement Agreement shall be offered in evidence or used for any other purpose in this or any other matter or proceeding other than as may be necessary to consummate or enforce the Settlement Agreement or the terms of this Final Judgment or by Apple in connection with any action asserting Released Claims. IX. DISMISSAL OF ACTIONS AND RELEASE Upon the Effective Date, and subject to the provisions of Section XI ofthis Final Judgment, Plaintiff States' and Settlement Class's Complaints are dismissed as against Apple with prejudice, except for Plaintiff States' claims for injunctive relief against Apple, which are currently under appeal in the Liability Appeal. Plaintiffs and Consumers who did not file with the Court valid and timely requests for exclusion from the Settlement Agreement are barred from fwther prosecution of the Released Claims, and Releasees are released and forever discharged from liability for the Released Claims. X. FINALITY OF JUDGMENT Except for the Order addressing Class Plaintiffs Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses Related to the Apple Settlement, and except for Plaintiff States' 1 With respect to the State of Colorado, its apportionment shall be used first for reimbursement of Colorado's actual costs and attorneys' fees, second, to be held, along with any interest thereon, in trust by the Attorney General for future consumer education, consumer fraud, or antitrust enforcement efforts. -6- Case 1:11-md-02293-DLC Document 683-1 Filed 11/19/14 Page 7 of 7 claims for injunctive relief against Apple, which are currently under appeal in the Liability Appeal, the Comt finds that this Final Judgment adjudicates all the claims, rights and liabilities of the Parties, and is final and shall be immediately appealable. XI. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment, the Court retains jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the Settlement Agreement and enabling any patty hereto to apply for such further orders and directions as may be necessary or appropriate for the construction or carrying out of this Final Judgment, the modification of any of the provisions hereto to the extent such modification is permitted, and to remedy a violation of any ofthe provisions contained herein. This Court shall have the authority to specifically enforce the provisions of this Final Judgment. SO ORDERED: 1ol-k Dated: New York, New York a1 , zoi4. Hon. DE United S -7- Attachmen~ARequests for Exclusion Requests For Exclusion 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Postm!!rk Date Claimant Name 9/10/2014 ANN C EVANGELISTA 9/10/2014 JEFFERY UTIELL 9/10/2014 JOSEPH SMITHWICK 9/10/2014 RIZRASHOI 9/10/2014 SUSAN RUTHERFORD 9/11/2014 ANDREW WAHL 9/11/2014 BRADLEY MOHR 9/11/2014 DAVID ENDAHL 9/11/2014 EDWARD DEVLIN 9/11/2014 FIN NUALA KELLEHER TESSIER 9/11/2014 JAMES SHELDON 9/11/2014 JEFF BOLES 9/11/2014 KARL GIBSON 9/11/2014 KEVIN HOANG 9/11/2014 KRISTINE ENDERLE 9/11/2014 MEREDITH WORLEY 9/11/2014 RYAN DIONNE 9/12/2014 AMYLAMBES 9/12/2014 GENEGAREZ 9/12/2014 PAOLA MORENO 9/12/2014 ROBERTO WAGNER FERRIRA MALTA 9/12/2014 RUSSELL MADSEN 9/12/2014 THE MARTIN FAMILY 9/13/2014 BONNIE FOWLER 9/13/2014 KEVIN PAULl 9/13/2014 WOODY DEAN COOK 9/15/2014 CARL GALLOZZI 9/15/2014 CHRISTOPHER J CASEBOLT 9/15/2014 DENISE COTE 9/15/2014 JOSEPH CILLUFFO 9/15/2014 JOYCE WEINER 9/15/2014 MARGARET JONES MICHAEL SANJONGCO 9/15/2014 9/15/2014 NANCY A HUGHES 9/16/2014 DAVID SUTTON 9/16/2014 FIONA SCOTT MORTON 9/16/2014 JODIEAREHA 9/16/2014 KENNETH M FUSARO 9/16/2014 KURT RUSSELL BURNUM 9/16/2014 MELINDA MARTIN 9/16/2014 PATRICK BROOKS 9/18/2014 ANNWPARKER 9/18/2014 SCOTIFLOYD 9/18/2014 WADE TREGASKIS 9/17/2014 BONNIE A CRIST 9/17/2014 DAN KLEIN 9/19/2014 ROGER HICKMAN Requests For Exclusion Claimant Name 48 DENISE JONES 49 DAVID BARNES 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 JOSH SCHOENWALD CARRIESYME SASHA VIZCARRONDO PARTICIA SIERER JONATHAN GREASLEY AWVAN BREEN LESLIE GNANT ALTHEA LOGAN ELLYN BROWN PATRICIA HAGEN GWENDOLYN F BOLE ROBERT J WIGGERS DAVID SEIDMAN NICOLE VALLONE NICOLE BLAIR DAVIDKULLY ETHAN GLASS JOHN READ JOHN ROBERT KRAMER II KTHERINE LEONG SUITON MARY BETH MCGEE NATHAN P SUTION SALLY M MARKS PATRIS TONEY ADAM SPEEGLE MICHAEL COLLARD WILLIAM D HETZEL Postmark Datg 9/20/2014 9/21/2014 9/25/2014 9/25/2014 9/26/2014 9/26/2014 9/30/2014 9/30/2014 10/1/2014 10/2/2014 10/3/2014 10/8/2014 10/11/2014 10/11/2014 10/13/2014 10/15/2014 10/17/2014 10/20/2014 10/20/2014 10/20/2014 10/20/2014 10/20/2014 10/20/2014 10/20/2014 10/20/2014 10/22/2014 10/27/2014 10/27/2014 10/27/2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?