Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University et al v. Trump et al
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Tassity S. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-13992063. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing (Connecticut), #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Johnson, Tassity) Modified on 8/8/2017 (jc).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
KNIGHT FIRST AMENDMENT INSTITUTE
AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY; REBECCA
BUCKWALTER; PHILIP COHEN; HOLLY
FIGUEROA; EUGENE GU; BRANDON
NEELY; JOSEPH PAPP; and NICHOLAS
Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-05205-NRB
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United
States; SEAN M. SPICER, White House Press
Secretary; DANIEL SCAVINO, White House
Director of Social Media and Assistant to the
The motion of Tassity S. Johnson for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the abovecaptioned action is granted.
Applicant has declared that she is a member in good standing of the bar of the State of
Connecticut, and that her contact information is as follows:
Tassity S. Johnson
Jenner & Block LLP
1099 New York Avenue NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20001
Telephone: (202) 639-6000
Facsimile: (202) 639-6066
Applicant having requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for
Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, et al., in the above-entitled matter;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the
above-captioned matter in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this court,
including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys.
United States District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?