Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University et al v. Trump et al

Filing 18

MOTION for Tassity S. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, # 2 Certificate of Good Standing (Connecticut), # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Johnson, Tassity)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KNIGHT FIRST AMENDMENT INSTITUTE AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY; REBECCA BUCKWALTER; PHILIP COHEN; HOLLY FIGUEROA; EUGENE GU; BRANDON NEELY; JOSEPH PAPP; and NICHOLAS PAPPAS, Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-05205-NRB [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States; SEAN M. SPICER, White House Press Secretary; DANIEL SCAVINO, White House Director of Social Media and Assistant to the President, Defendants. The motion of Tassity S. Johnson for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the abovecaptioned action is granted. Applicant has declared that she is a member in good standing of the bar of the State of Connecticut, and that her contact information is as follows: Tassity S. Johnson Jenner & Block LLP 1099 New York Avenue NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20001 Telephone: (202) 639-6000 Facsimile: (202) 639-6066 Applicant having requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, et al., in the above-entitled matter; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned matter in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. Dated: __________________ ______________ _________. United States District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?