Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University et al v. Trump et al
Filing
52
MOTION for Andrew Kim to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-14347628. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Amici Curiae Federal Courts Scholars. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Kim, Andrew)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
KNIGHT FIRST AMENDMENT INSTITUTE
AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY et al.,
Civil Action No. 1:17-05205 (NRB)
Plaintiffs,
AFFIDAVIT OF
ANDREW KIM
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP,
President of the United States et al.,
Defendants.
PURSUANT TO RULE 1.3(c) of the Local Rules for the United States District Courts
for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, I, Andrew Kim, declare that the following
facts are true:
1. I am in good standing of the bars of the State of California and the District of Columbia,
as demonstrated by the certificates of good standing annexed hereto as Exhibit 1.
2. I have never been convicted of a felony.
3. I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred, or denied admission or readmission by
any court.
4. There are no pending or previous disciplinary proceedings against me in any state or
federal court.
Dated: November 9, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Andrew Kim
Andrew Kim
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
901 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
Tel: (202) 346-4000
Fax: (202) 346-4444
AndrewKim@goodwinlaw.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on November 9, 2017, I caused a true and correct copy of the
foregoing to be served by electronic means, via the Court’s CM/ECF system, on all counsel
registered to receive electronic notices and caused copies of the aforementioned document to be
served via first class mail, postage prepaid upon any non-CM/ECF participants.
/s/ Andrew Kim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?