Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University et al v. Trump et al

Filing 52

MOTION for Andrew Kim to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-14347628. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Amici Curiae Federal Courts Scholars. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Kim, Andrew)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KNIGHT FIRST AMENDMENT INSTITUTE AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY et al., Civil Action No. 1:17-05205 (NRB) Plaintiffs, AFFIDAVIT OF ANDREW KIM v. DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States et al., Defendants. PURSUANT TO RULE 1.3(c) of the Local Rules for the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, I, Andrew Kim, declare that the following facts are true: 1. I am in good standing of the bars of the State of California and the District of Columbia, as demonstrated by the certificates of good standing annexed hereto as Exhibit 1. 2. I have never been convicted of a felony. 3. I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred, or denied admission or readmission by any court. 4. There are no pending or previous disciplinary proceedings against me in any state or federal court. Dated: November 9, 2017 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Andrew Kim Andrew Kim GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 901 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Tel: (202) 346-4000 Fax: (202) 346-4444 AndrewKim@goodwinlaw.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on November 9, 2017, I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing to be served by electronic means, via the Court’s CM/ECF system, on all counsel registered to receive electronic notices and caused copies of the aforementioned document to be served via first class mail, postage prepaid upon any non-CM/ECF participants. /s/ Andrew Kim

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?