Democratic National Committee v. The Russian Federation et al

Filing 24

FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Geoffrey A. Graber to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-14982301. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Democratic National Committee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - CGS of DC, #2 Exhibit B - CGS of California, #3 Exhibit C - Affidavit of Geoffrey Graber, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Graber, Geoffrey) Modified on 4/24/2018 (wb).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - -----------------------------------X DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-03501 -againstTHE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, et al., Defendants. - - ----------------------------------- X ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE The motion of Geoffrey Graber for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the abovecaptioned action is granted. Applicant has declared that he is a member in good standing of the bars of the state of California and the District of Columbia; and that his contact information is as follows: Applicant’s Name: Geoffrey Graber Firm Name: Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC Address: 1100 New York Ave., Suite 500, West Tower City / State / Zip: Washington / DC / 20005 Telephone / Fax: (202) 408-4600 / (202) 408-3688 Applicant having requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for Plaintiffs in the above-entitled action; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. Dated: __________________ _________________________________________ United States District / Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?