Ward v. Innosub USA et al

Filing 70

DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Mark Ward against John Doe Corp. 2, John Doe Corp. 3, Kissmax Design Company Limited, Vincent Palomo; in favor of Mark Ward against Kissmax Design Company Limited, Vincent Palomo; in favor of Mark Ward against John D oe Corp. 3; in favor of Mark Ward against Kissmax Design Company Limited in the amount of $150,600.00. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, That pursuant to the Courts Order dated March 31, 2021, Plaintiff's motions for default judgment against John Doe Corp. 3 d/b/a Teehelen (DI 48), Vincent Palomo and John Doe Corp. 2 d/b/a Casematic (DI 50), and (3) Kissmax Design Company Limited d/b/a Casematic all are granted to the extent that plaintiff shall have judgment against each of the foregoing defendants as follows: (a) in the amount of $150,000 in statutory damages together with post judgment interest as set forth in DI 68, (b) jointly severally in the amount of $400 for costs, (c) $75 jointly and severally against Palomo and Kissmax Design Company Limited d/b/a Casematic, (d) $50 against John Doe Corp. 3 d/b/a Teehelen, and (e) $75 against Kissmax Design Company Limited d/b/a Casematic. The motions are denied in all other respects. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 3/31/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------X
MARK WARD,
Plaintiff,
19 CIVIL 11100 (LAK)

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

-againstINNOSUB USA, et al.,
Defendant.
---------------------------------------------------------X

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, That pursuant to the
Court’s Order dated March 31, 2021, Plaintiff's motions for default judgment against John Doe
Corp. 3 d/b/a Teehelen (DI 48), Vincent Palomo and John Doe Corp. 2 d/b/a Casematic (DI 50),
and (3) Kissmax Design Company Limited d/b/a Casematic all are granted to the extent that
plaintiff shall have judgment against each of the foregoing defendants as follows: (a) in the amount
of $150,000 in statutory damages together with post judgment interest as set forth in DI 68, (b)
jointly severally in the amount of $400 for costs, (c) $75 jointly and severally against Palomo and
Kissmax Design Company Limited d/b/a Casematic, (d) $50 against John Doe Corp. 3 d/b/a
Teehelen, and (e) $75 against Kissmax Design Company Limited d/b/a Casematic. The motions
are denied in all other respects.
DATED: New York, New York
March 31, 2021
RUBY J. KRAJICK
__________________
Clerk of Court
BY: ___________________
Deputy Clerk