Upsolve, Inc. et al v. James

Filing 41

MOTION for David Halleck Fry to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25809936. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Law Professors. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of David H. Fry in support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, # 2 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Admission Pro Hac vice).(Fry, David)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UPSOLVE, INC. and REV. JOHN UDOOKON, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 1:22-cv-00627-PAC AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID H. FRY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE LETITIA JAMES, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Defendant. I, David H. Fry, hereby state: 1. I am admitted to practice before the courts of the State of California and am a member of the firm Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP. I am counsel for Amici Curiae Law Professors in this proceeding. A copy of the Certificate of Good Standing is attached hereto. 2. I have never been and am not presently subject to any disciplinary proceedings against me in any state or federal court. 3. I have never been convicted of a felony. 4. I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred or denied admission or readmission by any court. 5. I have prepared this affidavit pursuant to Local Rule 1.3. Dated: March 2, 2022 Respectfully Submitted, David H. Fry Munger, Tolles & l.s n LLP 560 Mission Street, 2th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel.: (415) 512-4082 Fax: (415) 512-4077 David.Fry@mto.com Counsel for Amici Curiae ~uprcntc Olaurt nf <D:ttl ifnrnia JORGE E. NAVARRETE (,'led: a11rl r.'xffmin' Offircr of the Sr1prm1t <:011rr CERTIFICATE OF THE CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DAVID IIALLECK FRY l, JORGE E. NAVARRETE, Clerk/Executive Officer of the Supreme Court of the State of California, do hereby cert(fy that DAVID HALLECK FRY, #189276, ·was on the 13th clay of June, 1997 duzy admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in all the courts of this state, and is now listed on the Roll ofAttorneys as a member of the bar of this state in good standing. Witness my hand and the seal of the court on the 18th day a/February 2022. JORGE E. NAVARRETE Clerk/E,;ecutive qfficer of the Supreme Court GOVERNMENT CODE § 8202 CALIFORNIA JURAY WITH AFFIANT STATEMENT :@See Attached Document (Notary to cross out lines 1- 6 below) D See Statement Below (Lines 1-6 to be completed only by document signer[s], not Notary) -------~-- 2 3 Signature of Document Signer No. 1 Signature of Document Signer No. 2 (if any) A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me Seiio f,e;f\C~S-Co on this 2 by Date (1) day of ~_ _ ,2021 Mo.rch Month , Year Dv.v;A fN (and (2) ~- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - ), Name(s) of Signer(s) PATRICK A. GOMEZ Notary Public · California San Francisco County Commission # 2301637 ~ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me. My Comm, £xpires Aug 16, 2023 Signature _ ___,e~ _ ~----v<_ ~ '-,..:Z:: ---r--~ ~ ? - -=---==== ~ -Sig~ blic Seal Place Notary Seal Above ---------------OPTIONAL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Document Date: _ _ _ _ _ __ Number of Pages: _ _ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ • ©2014 National Notary Association • www.NationalNotary.org • 1-800-US NOTARY (1 -800-876-6827) Item #5910

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?