Upsolve, Inc. et al v. James

Filing 42

MOTION for Andrew T. Nguyen to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25810234. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Law Professors. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Affidavit Of Andrew T. Nguyen, # 2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 3 Text of Proposed Order).(Nguyen, Andrew)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UPSOLVE, INC. and REV. JOHN UDOOKON, Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:22-cv-00627-PAC AFFIDAVIT OF ANDREW T. NGUYEN IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE vs. LETITIA JAMES, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State ofNew York, Defendant. I, Andrew T. Nguyen, hereby state: 1. I am admitted to practice before the courts of the State of California and am a member of the firm Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP. I am counsel for Amici Curiae Access to Justice Scholars in this proceeding. A copy of the Certificate of Good Standing is attached hereto. 2. I have never been and am not presently subject to any disciplinary proceedings against me in any state or federal court. 3. I have never been convicted of a felony. 4. I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred or denied admission or readmission by any court. 5. I have prepared this affidavit pursuant to Local Rule 1.3. Dated: February 25, 2022 Respec~tted, Andrew . Nguyen Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel.: (415) 512-4076 Fax: (415) 512-4077 Andrew.Nguyen@mto.com Counsel for Amici Curiae GOLDEN GATE NOTARY &APOSTILLE CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certtflcate verifies only the identity of the Individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, 8CCll'8cy, or validity of that document State of Cali!o{nia County of ~IS{{) ~&-! On o "'2...-- I 2,c- 1 9--~ before me, _ _ _ _D:....a=.:!yv:..:..ed.:....::..:B:....l.:.:.ack:......:....,N:..:..o:....ta.:.:.ry.:t..-P_u_bl_ic_ _ __. Here Insert Name and Tdle of the Officer Date · persona11y appeared -1.Aod~:i::vret~,1,u)_T_G_ ~ _1N~faVAU.Y.~ti:Jtz:=.~============-Nam6<sJ of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) ls/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. • DAYVED BLACK • l z Notary Public • California jg COMM. #2374469 San Mateo County ... M Comm. res Se , 9, 2025 I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature M-£ ~- Signature of Notary Public Place Notary Seal Above -------------0"10NAL------------Though this section is optional, completing this infonnation can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this fonn to an unintended document Description of Attached Document Trtle or Type of Document: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Document Date: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Number of Pages: _ _ _ __ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ D Corporate Officer - Trtle(s): _ _ _ _ __ Signer's Name: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ D Corporate Officer - Tltle(s): _ _ _ _ __ D Partner - D Limited O General D Individual D Attorney in Fact D Trustee or Conservator • Other: _ _ _D_Guardian _ _ _ _ _ _ __ D Limited D General O Attorney in Fact D Trustee D Guardian or Conservator • Other: _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Signer Is Representing: _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Signer Is Representing: _ _ _ _ _ _ __ D Partner - D Individual Golden Gate Mobile Notary & Apostille PO Box 717, San Francisco, CA 94104 I goldengatenotary.net I (415) 318-0163

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?