Ceglia v. Zuckerberg et al

Filing 134

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 128 MOTION to Compel by Paul D. Ceglia. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Affidavit of Jeffrey A. Lake, # 3 Affidavit of Paul A. Argentieri, # 4 Affidavit of Nathan A. Shaman, # 5 Exhibit A, # 6 Exhibit B, # 7 Exhibit C)(Lake, Jeffrey)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------ x : PAUL D. CEGLIA, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : MARK ELLIOT ZUCKERBERG and : FACEBOOK, INC., : : Defendants. ------------------------------------ x Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-00569RJA PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND NOTICE OF MOTION TO SET DELAYED BRIEFING SCHEDULE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Paul Ceglia will and hereby does move the Honorable Leslie G. Foschio for an order setting a delayed briefing schedule for Defendants’ Accelerated Motion to Compel Compliance with Paragraph 5 of the August 18 Order (Doc. No. 128) (Motion to Compel). Such an order would preserve judicial resources because District Judge Arcara’s rulings on Plaintiff’s Objections to the Court’s August 18, 2011 Order (Doc. No. 131) (Objections) may render Defendants’ Motion to Compel moot. Additionally, Defendants are in no position to oppose this request given their recent egregious conduct. Pursuant to L.R. Civ. P. 7(a)(1), Plaintiff hereby states his intention to file and serve reply papers. /// /// /// WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant this Motion and enter an order setting a delayed briefing schedule for Defendants’ Motion to Compel. Dated: September 2, 2011 Respectfully submitted, s/ Jeffrey A. Lake Attorney for Plaintiff 835 Fifth Avenue, Suite 200A San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 795-6460 jlake@lakeapc.com s/ Paul Argentieri Attorney for Plaintiff 188 Main Street Hornell, NY 14843 (323) 919-4513 paul.argentieri@gmail.com 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?