Ceglia v. Zuckerberg et al
Filing
134
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 128 MOTION to Compel by Paul D. Ceglia. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Affidavit of Jeffrey A. Lake, # 3 Affidavit of Paul A. Argentieri, # 4 Affidavit of Nathan A. Shaman, # 5 Exhibit A, # 6 Exhibit B, # 7 Exhibit C)(Lake, Jeffrey)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------ x
:
PAUL D. CEGLIA,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
MARK ELLIOT ZUCKERBERG and
:
FACEBOOK, INC.,
:
:
Defendants.
------------------------------------ x
Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-00569RJA
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND NOTICE OF MOTION TO SET DELAYED BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Paul Ceglia will and hereby does move the
Honorable Leslie G. Foschio for an order setting a delayed briefing schedule for Defendants’
Accelerated Motion to Compel Compliance with Paragraph 5 of the August 18 Order (Doc. No.
128) (Motion to Compel). Such an order would preserve judicial resources because District
Judge Arcara’s rulings on Plaintiff’s Objections to the Court’s August 18, 2011 Order (Doc. No.
131) (Objections) may render Defendants’ Motion to Compel moot. Additionally, Defendants
are in no position to oppose this request given their recent egregious conduct.
Pursuant to L.R. Civ. P. 7(a)(1), Plaintiff hereby states his intention to file and serve reply
papers.
///
///
///
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant this Motion and enter
an order setting a delayed briefing schedule for Defendants’ Motion to Compel.
Dated: September 2, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
s/ Jeffrey A. Lake
Attorney for Plaintiff
835 Fifth Avenue, Suite 200A
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 795-6460
jlake@lakeapc.com
s/ Paul Argentieri
Attorney for Plaintiff
188 Main Street
Hornell, NY 14843
(323) 919-4513
paul.argentieri@gmail.com
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?