Ceglia v. Zuckerberg et al
Filing
224
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re 223 MOTION Order re 41 Text Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge,,,,, Notice of Motion for Order Prohibiting Defendants from Reliance on Argument that Ceglia Zuckerberg email exchanges in Amended Complaint are Frauds in any dispositive motion MOTION Order re 41 Text Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge,,,,, Notice of Motion for Order Prohibiting Defendants from Reliance on Argument that Ceglia Zuckerberg email exchanges in Amended Complaint are Frauds in any dispositive motion byPaul D. Ceglia. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Certificate of Service)(Boland, Dean)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
PAUL D. CEGLIA,
Civil Action No. : 1:10-cv-00569-RJA
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
MARK ELLIOT ZUCKERBERG, Individually, and
FACEBOOK, INC.
Defendants.
I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746, that on
the 17th day of November, 2011, I caused the following documents to be filed with
the Clerk of the District Court for the Western District of New York using its Case
Management/Electronic Case Filing System which would then electronically notify
all counsel of record in this case:
1. Notice of Motion for Order Prohibiting Defendants from Reliance on any
Argument in any dispositive motion filed before or at the end of Expedited
Discovery that Email Exchanges Between Ceglia and Zuckerberg are Frauds; and
2. Memorandum in Support of Notice of Motion for Order Prohibiting Defendants
from Reliance on Argument that Email Exchanges Between Ceglia and
Zuckerberg are Frauds with Exhibits A and B; and
3. Declaration of Paul Ceglia; and
4. Declaration of Jerry Grant.
DATED: October 27, 2011
/s/Dean Boland
Dean Boland
18123 Sloane Avenue
Lakewood, Ohio 44107
216-236-8080 phone
866-455-1267 fax
dean@bolandlegal.com
ATTORNEY FOR PAUL D. CEGLIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?