Ceglia v. Zuckerberg et al

Filing 224

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re 223 MOTION Order re 41 Text Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge,,,,, Notice of Motion for Order Prohibiting Defendants from Reliance on Argument that Ceglia Zuckerberg email exchanges in Amended Complaint are Frauds in any dispositive motion MOTION Order re 41 Text Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge,,,,, Notice of Motion for Order Prohibiting Defendants from Reliance on Argument that Ceglia Zuckerberg email exchanges in Amended Complaint are Frauds in any dispositive motion byPaul D. Ceglia. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Certificate of Service)(Boland, Dean)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PAUL D. CEGLIA, Civil Action No. : 1:10-cv-00569-RJA Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. MARK ELLIOT ZUCKERBERG, Individually, and FACEBOOK, INC. Defendants. I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746, that on the 17th day of November, 2011, I caused the following documents to be filed with the Clerk of the District Court for the Western District of New York using its Case Management/Electronic Case Filing System which would then electronically notify all counsel of record in this case: 1. Notice of Motion for Order Prohibiting Defendants from Reliance on any Argument in any dispositive motion filed before or at the end of Expedited Discovery that Email Exchanges Between Ceglia and Zuckerberg are Frauds; and 2. Memorandum in Support of Notice of Motion for Order Prohibiting Defendants from Reliance on Argument that Email Exchanges Between Ceglia and Zuckerberg are Frauds with Exhibits A and B; and 3. Declaration of Paul Ceglia; and 4. Declaration of Jerry Grant. DATED: October 27, 2011 /s/Dean Boland Dean Boland 18123 Sloane Avenue Lakewood, Ohio 44107 216-236-8080 phone 866-455-1267 fax dean@bolandlegal.com ATTORNEY FOR PAUL D. CEGLIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?