Ceglia v. Zuckerberg et al
Filing
555
DECLARATION signed by Alexander H. Southwell re 553 MOTION for Discovery filed by Mark Elliot Zuckerberg, Facebook, Inc. filed by Mark Elliot Zuckerberg, Facebook, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X, # 25 Exhibit Y, # 26 Exhibit Z, # 27 Exhibit AA, # 28 Exhibit BB, # 29 Exhibit CC, # 30 Exhibit DD, # 31 Exhibit EE, # 32 Exhibit FF, # 33 Exhibit GG, # 34 Exhibit HH, # 35 Exhibit II, # 36 Exhibit JJ, # 37 Exhibit KK, # 38 Exhibit LL, # 39 Exhibit MM, # 40 Exhibit NN)(Snyder, Orin)
EXHIBIT X
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Southwell, Alexander H.
Friday, August 10, 2012 5:32 PM
Dean Boland; Paul Argentieri
Benjamin, Matthew; Aycock, Amanda
RE: Inventory of Larry Stewart's Toner Library
RE: Response on emails re expert documents; 2012.07.16 Letter from A. Southwell to D.
Boland.pdf; Re: Stewart materials
Mr. Boland:
As detailed in our July 16 letter sent after Mr. Stewart’s July 11th deposition (attached), and as even further detailed in
my July 24 email (to which you never responded; attached), you and Mr. Stewart made clear but erroneous
representations on the record that Mr. Stewart’s notes have been produced to Defendants. Mr. Stewart represented
numerous times on the record that he had produced a PDF of his “file” to Defendants. See, e.g., Stewart Depo. Tr. at
346:5-6, 351:24-352:9, 368:7-9. Defendants have never received any such file. In fact, you yourself represented on the
record during the course of Mr. Stewart’s deposition that “all of the documents” had been provided to
Defendants. Stewart Depo. Tr. at 378:10. And again, in your August 1, 2012 email (attached), you make the
representation that, “These materials, his handwritten notes, were provided in November 2011 to Defendants and a
second time the week before his deposition.” These representations are false.
To be absolutely clear, neither you nor Mr. Stewart have ever provided Mr. Stewart’s file or all of his handwritten notes
to Defendants. In reality, all Defendants were provided with on July 5, 2012 in advance of Mr. Stewart’s July 11
deposition were approximately 23 piecemeal photographs in JPG format of portions of documents and other materials,
and two web archives; many of these materials were incomplete, nonresponsive, and/or irrelevant.
It is apparent that you and Mr. Stewart are attempting to conceal highly relevant material. Representatives for
Defendants were present at Mr. Stewart’s sampling of the physical documents on July 25, 2011. Defendants are aware
that Mr. Stewart used two “TLC Worksheet Form” documents to inventory his sampling from the Work for Hire and
Specifications documents. Mr. Stewart has selectively produced only the first of these worksheets, and only because we
requested to make a copy at his deposition. See Defendants’ Exhibit 26. Please produce a copy of the second
worksheet documenting his sampling immediately.
Additionally, Mr. Stewart represented in his deposition that there were additional inventory worksheets, including a
worksheet documenting ink samples. See Stewart Depo. Tr. 372:19-373:6. Please produce a copy of Mr. Stewart’s
inventory of ink sampling immediately.
In addition, there are numerous other materials that you should have produced related to Mr. Stewart’s files, which you
have not adequately responded to. Defendants reserve all rights, including the right to continue Mr. Stewart’s
deposition to address these issues and move the Court to compel these and other materials and for sanctions.
Alex
From: Dean Boland [mailto:dean@bolandlegal.com]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 12:43 PM
To: Southwell, Alexander H.; Paul Argentieri
Subject: Inventory of Larry Stewart's Toner Library
Alex:
1
To clear up the confusion on this issue, your request for the entire inventory of his library of standards is
excessive and not required by the rules or our agreement. He has provided the portions of this library pertinent
to this case.
We have provided all of the information that was used to support Mr. Stewart's conclusions in his report.
I don't believe there is anything else you have requested that you are entitled to obtain. If you disagree, please
advise.
Dean Boland.
-Dean Boland
Owner/Member
Boland Legal, LLC
1475 Warren Road
Unit 770724
Lakewood, Ohio 44107
216.236.8080 ph
866.455.1267 fax
dean@bolandlegal.com
Please note, I typically only review my emails once daily. If there is something urgent in any email, please do
not hesitate to contact my office at 216-236-8080.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?