Ceglia v. Zuckerberg et al

Filing 661

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 654 Objections -- non-motion,, , MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Paul D. Ceglia. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Paul Argentieri, Esq. in Support of Motion, # 2 Text of Proposed Order, # 3 Certificate of Service)(Argentieri, Paul)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ___________________________________ : : Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-00569-RJA : Plaintiff, : : v. : [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING : PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENLARGE MARK ELLIOT ZUCKERBERG and : TIME TO FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITION FACEBOOK, INC., : TO OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE’S : REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND Defendants. : FOR AN INCREASE IN THE PAGE LIMIT ___________________________________ : PAUL D. CEGLIA, THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Enlarge Time to File Reply to Opposition to Objections to Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation and for an Increase in the Page Limit, and Defendants having taken a position neither in favor of nor in opposition thereto, and the Court, having reviewed the file, and being fully advised in the premises, and good cause having been shown, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Enlarge Time to File Reply to Opposition to Objections to Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation and for an Increase in the Page Limit is hereby GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff shall file his reply to Defendants’ opposition on or before May 22, 2013; 3. Plaintiff may file a reply of up to 20 pages. and SO ORDERED this _____ day of May, 2013. ______________________________________ Honorable Richard J. Arcara, United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?