Blackwater Security Consulting, LLC et al v Nordan
Blackwater Security Consulting, LLC et al v Nordan
Page 1 of 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTHERN DIVISION NO. 2:06-CV-49-F BLACKWATER SECURITY ) CONSULTING, LLC, a Delaware Limited ) Liability Company; BLACKWATER ) LODGE AND TRAINING CENTER, INC., ) a Delaware Corporation, ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) ) RICHARD P. NORDAN, as Ancillary ) Administrator for the separate Estates of ) STEPHEN S. HELVENSTON, MIKE R. ) TEAGUE, JERKO GERALD ZOVKO ) and WESLEY J.K. BATALONA, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________)
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION
Blackwater Security Consulting, LLC and Blackwater Lodge and Training Center, Inc. (collectively, "Blackwater"), respectfully move this Court, pursuant to Rule 15(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for leave to file a Supplemental Petition in this case. A copy of the proposed Supplemental Petition, including all exhibits thereto, is annexed to this motion as Exhibit 1. 1. Blackwater commenced an arbitration against respondent Richard P. Nordan, in
his capacity as Ancillary Administrator ("Nordan"). That arbitration is pending before the American Arbitration Association ("AAA") as Case No. 50 181 T 00524 06. 2. This Court's Orders of April 20 and May 11, 2007 in this action require Nordan to
arbitrate his claims against Blackwater, but take no position on the propriety of Blackwater's
Page 2 of 5
claims against him. Since the entry of those orders, Nordan has asserted, both before this Court and before the AAA, that he is not required to arbitrate the claims Blackwater has brought against him, and he has also failed to pay his share of the arbitrators' fees as requested by the AAA, which could result in the dismissal of the arbitration. (See Exhibit 1 hereto, ¶¶ 22-32 and accompanying exhibits.) 3. Nordan, through his counsel, has publicly asserted, falsely, that Blackwater "is
suing the families for $10 million to silence them and keep them out of court." 4. Accordingly, in light of those events, which have taken place since the entry of
this Court's orders of April 20 and May 11, 2007, Blackwater respectfully submits that this Court should issue a definitive ruling as to Nordan's obligation to arbitrate Blackwater's claims against him. In order to obtain such ruling, Blackwater respectfully requests leave to file the accompanying Supplemental Petition. 5. Under Rule 15(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court may, upon
motion, "permit [a] party to serve a supplemental pleading setting forth transactions or occurrences or events which have happened since the date of the pleading sought to be supplemented." 6. "The goal of Rule 15(d) is to establish a liberal policy favoring a merit-based
resolution of the entire controversy between the parties," Eisen v. Kallstrom, 75 F. Supp.2d 113, 116 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) (quotations omitted), and to prevent a party from having "to go through the needless formality and expense of instituting a new action when events occurring after the original filing indicated [it] had a right to relief." Frank v. Ross, 313 F.3d 184, 198 (4th Cir. 2002) (quotations omitted).
Page 3 of 5
Accordingly, the standards governing a motion to supplement under Rule 15(d)
are the same as those governing a motion for leave to amend under Rule 15(a). Frank v. Ross, 313 F.3d at 198 n.15; Micron Technology, Inc. v. Rambus Inc., 409 F. Supp.2d 552, 558 (D. Del. 2006). In other words, "leave should be freely granted, and should be denied only where good reason exists, such as prejudice to defendants." Frank v. Ross, 313 F.3d at 198 n.15. Accord, Families & Youth Inc. v. Maruca, 156 F. Supp.2d 1245, 1249 (D.N.M. 2001); Eisen v. Kallstrom, 75 F. Supp.2d at 116. 8. In this case, Nordan can demonstrate neither undue prejudice nor any other
ground sufficient to overcome the Federal Rules' policy that leave to supplement should be "freely granted." Frank v. Ross, 313 F.3d at 198 n.15. 9. Under 9 U.S.C. § 6, this Petition should be treated as a motion, and should be
given expedited consideration in light of the FAA's "goal of moving the parties to an arbitral dispute . . . into arbitration as quickly and easily as possible." Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Randolph, 531 U.S. 79, 85 (2000). 10. Accordingly, Blackwater should be granted leave to serve and file the annexed
Page 4 of 5
This 10th day of July 2007. McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP By: /s/ Michael P. Socarras Michael P. Socarras DC Bar No. 418127 600 13th Street NW Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 756-8000 Facsimile: (202) 756-8087 E-Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, L.L.P. By: /s/ Kirk G. Warner Kirk G. Warner North Carolina State Bar No. 16238 Mark A. Ash North Carolina State Bar No. 13967 Post Office Box 2611 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Telephone: (919) 821-1220 Facsimile: (919) 821-6700 E-Mails: email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org LR 83.1 Counsel Counsel for Defendants Blackwater Security Consulting, LLC and Blackwater Lodge and Training Center, Inc.
Page 5 of 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the date below, the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system. Notification of such filing was given, as indicated below, by the CM/ECF system to those registered, or by mailing a copy of the same by United States Mail, postage paid, to parties who are not registered to receive a Notice of Electronic Filing for this case: David F. Kirby William B. Bystrinski Kirby & Holt, LLP 3201 Glenwood Avenue Suite 100 Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org David S. Coats Bailey & Dixon Post Office Box 1351 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 email@example.com Daniel J. Callahan Marc P. Miles Callahan & Blaine, APLC 3 Hutton Centre Drive Suite 900 Santa Ana, California 92707
This 10th day of July 2007.
/s/ Kirk G. Warner Kirk G. Warner
MOTION for Leave to File a Supplemental Petition
by Blackwater Security Consulting, LLC, Blackwater Lodge & Training Center, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1
Exhibit 1# 2
Exhibit A# 3
Exhibit B1# 4
Exhibit B2# 5
Exhibit C# 6
Exhibit D# 7
Exhibit E# 8
Exhibit F) (Warner, Kirk)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?