LYTTLE v. The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 49 and 51 Motions to Dismiss. Counsel should read the order and the attachment in their entirety for critical deadlines and information. Objections due by 12/1/2011. Signed by US Magistrate Judge William A. Webb on 11/14/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Filing of Objections). (Sawyer, D.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EASTERN DIVISION
CASE NO. 4:10-CV-142-D
MARK DANIEL LYTTLE,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
ET AL.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NOTICE
Attached to this notice is a memorandum and recommendation of a United States Magistrate
Judge in this action that has been entered on the records of this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
ยง636(b)(1)(c), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2)-(3), and Local Civil Rule 72.4(b), EDNC. Rule 72(b) provides
as follows:
(2) Objections. Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended
disposition, a party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed
findings and recommendations. A party may respond to another party's objections
within 14 days after being served with a copy. Unless the district judge orders
otherwise, the objecting party must promptly arrange for transcribing the record, or
whatever portions of it the parties agree to or the magistrate judge considers
sufficient.
(3) Resolving Objections. The district judge must determine de novo any part of the
magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge
may accept, reject, or modify the recommended decision; receive further evidence;
or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.
You are hereby notified that unless written objections are timely filed in accordance with this
rule, you will have waived the right to further consideration of these issues by the district judge, and
an appropriate order based on the memorandum and recommendation will be entered. Furthermore,
failure to file timely objections to the findings and recommendation set forth by the magistrate judge
may result in a waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of this court based on such findings and
recommendations. See Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1985).
Date Filed: November 14, 2011.
/s/ DENNIS P. IAVARONE
CLERK OF COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?