Lulu Enterprises, Inc. v. N-F Newsite, LLC et al

Filing 68

MOTION to Seal Document #56 Notice-(other) by N-F Newsite, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Silver, Hayden)

Lulu Enterprises, Inc. v. N-F Newsite, LLC et al

Doc. 68 Att. 1

Case 5:07-cv-00347-D

Document 68-2

Filed 10/09/2007

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO. 5:07-cv-00347-D

LULU ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, vs. HULU, LLC, et al., Defendants. ORDER ALLOWING DOCUMENTS TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL

This matter is before the Court on the motion of Defendant Hulu, LLC to file and retain under seal the following documents: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Supplemental Confidential Declaration of Jason Kilar, with Exhibits A-C; March 21, 2007 Presentation, "NewSite JV Overview" (DEF000134DEF000147); Transcript, Deposition of Jason Kilar, taken September 28, 2007; August 29, 2007 "Hulu Name and Beta Announce FAQ ­ Internal Only," (DEF000446-DEF000447); September 2007 Presentation, "Hulu Overview" (DEF000252-DEF000262); August 20, 2007 Screenshot, "Customer sign-ups for Hulu beta, dated 8/20" (DEF000001); April 2007 Presentation, "NewSite JV Business Plan" (DEF000111-DEF000133); May 9, 2007 Interbrand Memorandum, "NewSite Creative Brief" (DEF001227DEF001232); August 15, 2007 e-mail from Andrew Racine to Carolyn Glass, NBC Universal (DEF000658-DEF000661);

US2000 10360768.1

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:07-cv-00347-D

Document 68-2

Filed 10/09/2007

Page 2 of 2

(10) (11)

September 5, 2007 email from Jason Kilar to "[e-mail]" (DEF000404-DEF000405); Image of Hulu logo (DEF001490)

The Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: 1. It is necessary for the Court to review the above-listed documents and information

to properly consider the pending motions before the Court. 2. The documents listed herein contain confidential, proprietary, and competitively

sensitive business and financial information relating to Defendant. 3. Adequate notice and opportunity has been given to the public and interested

parties to object to Defendant's motion. 4. The Court has carefully weighed the interests advanced by the Defendant and

those interests favoring public access to judicial documents and records. 5. The interests advanced by the Defendant override any common law or

constitutional right of public access which may attach to the information NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of the record and the parties' positions and pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 79.2, it is ordered that the documents listed above be sealed.

It is so ordered this the _______ day of ___________________, 2007.

JAMES C. DEVER, III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

US2000 10360768.1