EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al

Filing 24

Joint MOTION to Exceed Page Limit in motion-to-dismiss briefing, Joint MOTION for Extension of Time To File Motion to Dismiss or to Answer by LINWOOD WILSON, STEVEN W. CHALMERS, BEVERLY COUNCIL, RONALD HODGE, JEFF LAMB, STEPHEN MIHAICH, MICHAEL RIPBERGER, LEE RUSS, DNA SECURITY, INC., RICHARD CLARK, BRIAN MEEHAN, DAVID F. EVANS, COLLIN FINNERTY, READE SELIGMANN, DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF, MICHAEL B. NIFONG, MARK GOTTLIEB, BENJAMIN HIMAN, DAVID ADDISON. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(DAVANT, CHARLES)

EVANS

et

al

v.

DURHAM,

NORTH

CAROLINA,

CITY

OF

et

al

D

Doc.

24

Att.

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA DAVID F. EVANS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF DURHAM, N.C., et al., Defendants. ORDER Upon consideration of the Joint Motion of All Parties to Extend Page Limitations and To Establish Briefing Schedule ("Joint Motion"), for good cause shown and with the agreement of all parties, it is hereby ORDERED that 1. 2. The Joint Motion is GRANTED; Each of the following Defendants or groups of Defendants Case No. 1:07CV739

enumerated below shall have up to and including 50 pages to brief their respective motions to dismiss, and up to and including 25 pages to brief their respective reply memoranda: a. b. c. d. e. f. The City of Durham; Michael B. Nifong; Mark Gottlieb; Benjamin Himan; David Addison; Linwood Wilson;

ockets.Justia.com

g.

Steven Chalmers, Beverly Council, Ronald Hodge, Jeff Lamb, Stephen Mihaich, Michael Ripberger, and Lee Russ ("Supervisory Defendants"); DNA Security, Inc. and Richard Clark; and Brian Meehan.

h. i. 3.

Plaintiffs shall have up to and including 50 pages to respond to each

motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs may file a consolidated brief in excess of 50 pages to respond to common issues and/or multiple motions, so long as no more than 50 pages of briefing are devoted to arguments exclusively raised by a single Defendant's or group of Defendants' motion. 4. to dismiss: a. b. c. Motions or answers due: Opposition(s) due: Replies due: January 15, 2008; 90 days after filing of Motions; and 30 days after filing of Opposition(s). The following briefing schedule shall apply to Defendants' motions

It is so ORDERED this ______ day of _______________, 2007.

_____________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge