EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al

Filing 53

MOTION for Enlargement of Time to File Reply Brief in Support of 38 MOTION to Dismiss, 42 MOTION to Dismiss, 36 MOTION to Dismiss, 25 Order on Motion to Exceed Page Limit, Order on Motion for Extension of Time To File Motion, Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages, 40 MOTION to Dismiss, 34 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), 51 Response in Opposition to Motion, by STEVEN W. CHALMERS, BEVERLY COUNCIL, RONALD HODGE, PATRICK BAKER, JEFF LAMB, MICHAEL RIPBERGER, LEE RUSS, DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF, MARK GOTTLIEB, BENJAMIN HIMAN, DAVID ADDISON. Responses due by 5/21/2008 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (GILLESPIE, REGINALD) Modified on 4/29/2008 to reflect accurate title of pldg. (Lee, Lisa).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-00739 DAVID F. EVANS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) THE CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, ) et al., ) ) ) Defendants.

ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR REPLY BRIEFS

FOR CAUSE SHOWN, on motion of Defendants City of Durham, North Carolina, David Addison, Patrick Baker, Steven Chalmers, Beverly Council, Mark Gottlieb, Benjamin Himan, Ronald Hodge, Jeff Lamb, Michael Ripberger, and Lee Russ, and pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and LR6.1(a), MDNC, it is hereby ordered that the time within which the moving Defendants may file and serve reply briefs in support of their motions to dismiss be, and such time hereby is, enlarged, through and including May 9, 2008. This the _____ day of ______________________, 2008.

________________________________ Magistrate Judge/Judge United States District Court Middle District of North Carolina

8838-32\P\007 OET