MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 126

REQUEST for Clarification of the Court's June 4, 2009 Order re #119 Order by Plaintiffs RYAN MCFADYEN, MATTHEW WILSON, BRECK ARCHER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(EKSTRAND, ROBERT)

EXHIBIT A
(Proposed Order)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA RYAN McFADYEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-953

ORDER The matter before the Court is Plaintiffs' Request for Clarification of the Court's June 4, 2009, Order, and Alternative Motion to Enlarge the Number of Pages or Briefs Plaintiffs May File in Response to Defendants' Supplemental Briefs Regarding Ashcroft v. Iqbal. ("Motion") (Docket No. 126). Upon consideration of the Motion, it is hereby ORDERED that, within 20 days after Defendants' Supplemental Briefs are filed, Plaintiffs may file one consolidated Response Brief, not to exceed 60 pages, [or, alternatively, Plaintiffs may file 4 Response Briefs, with each Response Brief not to exceed 20 pages] responding to the issues raised in the Defendants' Supplemental Briefs (Docket Nos. 120-125). So ORDERD on this, the ______ day of June, 2009. ____________________________ United States District Judge