MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 264

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by ROBERT DEAN, MATTHEW DRUMMOND, DUKE UNIVERSITY, AARON GRAVES, GARY N. SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Brief Meeting Page Length, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(WELLS, DIXIE)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 1:07-CV-00953 RYAN McFADYEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION IN REPLY BRIEF Defendants. This matter came before the undersigned upon the consent motion of Defendants Duke University, Robert Dean, Matthew Drummond, Aaron Graves, and Gary N. Smith (the “Duke Defendants”) for an order allowing them to file a reply brief in excess of the page limitation set forth in Local Rule 7.3(d) of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, and accepting the Duke Defendants’ Reply Brief in Further Support of Motion for Protective Order Concerning Plaintiffs’ Subpoenas Addressed to BursonMarsteller and Edelman, ECF No. 261 (the “Reply Brief”) as filed. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Duke Defendants are granted leave to exceed the page limitation set forth in Local Rule 7.3(d) in the Reply Brief and that the Court accepts the Reply Brief, as filed, notwithstanding its noncompliance with Local Rule 7.3(d). This ________ day of January, 2012. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?