MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
Filing
264
MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by ROBERT DEAN, MATTHEW DRUMMOND, DUKE UNIVERSITY, AARON GRAVES, GARY N. SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Brief Meeting Page Length, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(WELLS, DIXIE)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 1:07-CV-00953
RYAN McFADYEN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al.,
[PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO
EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION IN
REPLY BRIEF
Defendants.
This matter came before the undersigned upon the consent motion of
Defendants Duke University, Robert Dean, Matthew Drummond, Aaron Graves,
and Gary N. Smith (the “Duke Defendants”) for an order allowing them to file a
reply brief in excess of the page limitation set forth in Local Rule 7.3(d) of the
United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, and
accepting the Duke Defendants’ Reply Brief in Further Support of Motion for
Protective Order Concerning Plaintiffs’ Subpoenas Addressed to BursonMarsteller and Edelman, ECF No. 261 (the “Reply Brief”) as filed.
For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Duke Defendants are
granted leave to exceed the page limitation set forth in Local Rule 7.3(d) in the
Reply Brief and that the Court accepts the Reply Brief, as filed, notwithstanding its
noncompliance with Local Rule 7.3(d).
This ________ day of January, 2012.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?